Posted on 06/25/2008 11:56:11 AM PDT by pissant
The following shows that the Delaware matter is nothing more than a vindictive attack by the Obama Camp those in powerful places who support Barack Obama’s dirty Chicago Style Politics.
On June 16 and 17, 2008 two letters from the Social Security Administration were mailed to my Duluth home stating that my disability and medical benefits had been terminated for the following reasons:
“Our records show that the following warrant for your arrest was issued for a parole or probation violation:”
Issued by:
New Castle County Superior Court
N King Street, Ste 500
Wilmington, DE 19801
Date of Warrant: February 5, 2008
Type of crime: probation or parole violation
Warrant Number: U708000607
Originating case number: U708000607
NCIC Number: W283822252
What is so telling about this is the following:
1. I am not now nor have I ever been on probation or parole from the State of Delaware.
2. I have not ever been charged with, tried nor convicted of any crime in the state of Delaware
3. The information contained in this letter does not match the case number indicated on the court documents dated June 23, 2008 from the “alleged” warrant used to arrest me by DC Metro Police on June 18, 2008.
I am not on any probation or any parole from any State or Jurisdiction of any kind nor have I been since my Colorado Parole was discharged on May 5, 2000.
It is just amazing how I am being targeted with non-stop manufactured warrants and charges which only surfaced after I began making public my claims against Barack Obama.
Even more interesting is Social Securities letter being dated the exact same dates that the DC Metro Police and the National Press Club security director begin organizing their plan to take me into custody on a non-existant “Fugitive from Justice” warrant.
THIS ACTION HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE COLORADO MATTER AS PER SSA OWN PROCEDURES. SO ANY CLAIMS BY OTHER BLOGGERS TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS ACTION ARE NOTHING MORE THAN THEIR TRYING TO APPEAR MORE IMPORTANT THAN THEY ARE. THIS ACTION WAS DONE BY OFFICIALS CONNECTED TO THE OBAMA CAMP AND THE DATE OF THE SSA LETTER SUPPORTS THIS.
Nice use of the language! Perhaps Larry should invest in a grammar checker.
Perhaps the coverup will end up being worse than the crime?
Huh?
No...the SSA cut off his disability benefits because someone reported he had a warrant in Delaware for violation of probation/parole, which was false as he has never been on probation/parole in that state. If true, this is just wrong and heads need to roll.
“So the Social Security Administration got Sinclair charged with a crime in Delaware in order to help the Obama campaign? Huh?”
No...it sounds like folks in administrative positions in many different state and federal agencies have been given the word contemporaneously that Mr. Sinclair’s life should be made difficult. The dates that he points out would seem to indicate that the social security letter was using the Delaware information as cause for it’s action. Yet, the letter was dated on the same date the Delaware action became known to anyone beyond the U. S. Marshalls. This would lead you to believe that Social Security heard about the arrest and the same day sent out a letter. When was the last time you saw that happen? Further, I may be going out on a limb here but I have been down to the Social Security office with my brother and one look around led me to believe the place was run by Obama supporters...just my opinion.
We should all be very concerned about this. Whether Larry Sinclair is telling the truth or not becomes secondary to setting the precedent for using government agencies in an organized harrassment to squelch free speech.
Aren’t we seeing a pattern here? Isn’t anyone who comes up against Obama with an opinion that is different from his, in the line of fire? Either they are racist, law breakers, making it up, using the same old politics or filled with antipathy toward people who are not like them. Obama and his campaign seem to be marginalizing even as they profess to represent the marginalized.
Larry is persistent, but rather incoherent.
How did I miss the fact that he was on disability before? What is his disability?
Maybe he has trouble typing with his mouth full...
That precedent has been established long ago - for ex: ask Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly = etc., = how often they are summoned for an audit...(audits are supposed to be random - but folks they want to intimidate seem to get 'randomly' selected year after year)
This Gestapo use of the IRS has been used extensively ever since, back in prohibition days, when they couldn't get anything to stick to Al Capone - they finally put him away on tax evasion.
We all remember the infamous "File-Gate" with the FBI files being sent over to Hitlery - but who remembers that they fired the head of the IRS and installed a friend of the hilderbeasts?
Control through intimidation through the IRS is the modus operandi of the powers that be in DC
looks like this is his second time that his disability benefits have been denied. Also, he is terminally Ill!
“1. Defendant is disabled with severe spine injury and nerve damage in upper and lower extremities
2. Defendant is terminally ill.
3. Defendant’s sole support and means of support has been Social Security Supplemental Income disability payments until receiving notice that July 30, 2004, that said payments were being halted due to the belief the defendant is fleeing to avoid prosecution.”
I guess it’s time to change his name again and apply for benefits somewhere else.
True, but does he deserve the benefit of doubt if he is on pain medication due to a disability, perhaps?
He is either a compulsive liar, or a man who has made a terrble mess of his life and is now attempting to rectify his conscious by confessing a terrible wrong.
Consider connections through the DC law firm of Williams & Connolly.
“1. I am not now nor have I ever been on probation or parole from the State of Delaware.
2. I have not ever been charged with, tried nor convicted of any crime in the state of Delaware”
This is getting pretty deep - I’m wondering how long he can keep this up.
From Larrys website (a few inches down from where he posted 1 and 2, above)
“Upon my return to Delaware, I appeared before a Superior Court Judge at 2:30 pm at which time I was released on PR bond and released. I will say that the charge is questionable at best and after speaking with my Attorney I will allow him/her decide what can and cannot be posted here.”
So he was released on “Personal Reconnaissance” which means he was most definitely charged with something, presumably the insurance fraud charge from last year. It also means that DC was justified when they arrested him and shipped him to delaware, since it’s unlikely that the charge he was bonded for was from something that happened after he they dropped him off.
I suppose that he can claim to have never been charged because he skipped town before they had a chance to actually arrest him and nobody actually served a summons to his new residence. It’s also true that a bench warrant is not a parole violation, but he’s shaving the truth awfully close at that point.
This guy is the opposite of everything that conservatives are supposed to believe it. He’s a professional victim and parasite and he still gets a heros welcome at FR. Not to mention the people who are flying him around the country and paying all his bills.
With a poster child like Larry, who needs McCain?
PERSONAL RECOGNIZANCE - Sometimes called own recognizance. A person who promises to appear in court to answer criminal charges can sometimes be released from jail without having to pay bail. This person is said to be released on his or her personal recognizance.
In other words, he left the state without permission while under PR and, just like the last time I posted above, his SSA has been pulled for fleeing prosecution.
Cavorting with trolls, I see. ROFL
Hey troll, I don’t care if satan himself pancakes Obama’s political career. The question is not Larry’s squeaky clean life - as if someone who snorts coke and gives BJs to stangers is ever a good witness - the question is did Obama do this. And on the reliability scale, I’ll say Obama is about 10 rungs lower than a druggie criminal like Sinclair.
Why don’t you open your eyes?
He says he hasn’t been charged with a crime in Delaware and that he isn’t on probation. True enough.
He doesn’t mention that he is accused of a crime in Delaware and that he was released on his own recognizance because he was too poor to pay bail.
Had he not skipped town, he would be charged. He lost his SSA because he is apparently fleeing from prosecution.
When did he skip town?
Heis still in Delaware? He was in Minnesota last I heard.
He was released by the judge.
He was released on PR. This is the same thing as being released on bond legally except no money changes hand. You can not travel out of state without written permission from the court. Your post suggests he didn't have that permission and that is why he isn't receiving his SSI. It can be revoke if you are considered a fugitive from justice. He had it revoked once before for the same reason.
My post suggests nothing of the sort. Look at the dates of the SS letters he received and compare it to monday when he visited the judge.
So you are denying that he lost his benefits or that he is accused of a crime in Delaware, or that he left the state, or what?
Are you Larry Sinclair or his slimebag “lawyer”?
You are claiming he skipped town and therefore lost his benefits. Then I asked you when he skipped town, and you said he left delaware and was in Minn. The day he left Delaware was two days ago. So how could the SSA send out letters on the 16th and 17th with regards to your skipping town date?
“The day he left Delaware was two days ago.”
This is his statement from June 19th, 2008
http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/2033169/posts
“I am 46 years old and I currently reside in Duluth, MN”
On June 19th 2008, he had been in Minnesota long enough to establish residency. He was in Minnesota whemn the letters were written and they reference a warrant from February.
It seems pretty obvious that he bolted to Minnesota, started shooting his mouth off and Delaware cancelled his SSA.
I would normally think a FReeper would just be wrong, but you seem to be deliberately lying for this guy. Why?
Oh, I see. So he was told by the authorities not to leave Delaware back in February? He has been living in Minn. since before his original January video was released.
On June 16, Senator Joe Biden introduced a new Bill, The Fugitive Information Networked Database (FIND) Act of 2008 (S.3136).
Interesting. What is the Biden Sr., Biden Jr., SSA -obambi Sinclair connection?
from: http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/
Larry Sinclair was arrested on June 18, 2008, just after his news
conference at the National Press Club. Apparently a DC warrant
was fabricated to allow Sinclair’s arrest. Almost a week later,
Sinclair was transported to Delaware and appeared before a judge.
Sinclair was released on his own recognizance.
Larry Sinclair has received 2 letters from the Social Security
Administration referring to an alleged Delaware warrant dated
February 5, 2008. That is just a few weeks after his first YouTube
video came out. The letters were dated June 16 and 17, 2008.
The Attorney General of Delaware is the son of Senator Joe Biden.
On June 16, Senator Joe Biden introduced a new Bill, The Fugitive Information Networked Database (FIND) Act of 2008 (S.3136).
The bill
“will encourage States to enter new and outstanding felony warrants into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database by authorizing grants to State and local agencies to upgrade their warrant databases. This upgrade will make their systems compatible and interoperable with the national database – allowing for seamless entry of state and local warrants into the federal database. The FIND Act will also authorize additional funds for the extradition of fugitives.”
Obviously Senator Biden and his staff have been working on this bill
for a while and someone associated with the bill must have expertise
in the area of warrants.
Read more about the bill here:
http://biden.senate.gov/press/press_releases/release/?id=EBCFC374-C454-4D01-8950-4A253DAD29D9
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/
Check it out,
it talks about ....
On June 16, Senator Joe Biden introduced a new Bill, The Fugitive Information Networked Database (FIND) Act of 2008 (S.3136).
The bill
“will encourage States to enter new and outstanding felony warrants into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database by authorizing grants to State and local agencies to upgrade their warrant databases. This upgrade will make their systems compatible and interoperable with the national database – allowing for seamless entry of state and local warrants into the federal database. The FIND Act will also authorize additional funds for the extradition of fugitives.”
In your previous response you said he left Delaware just two days ago. Now you suggest January 2008?
If a warrant was issued in February, his hearing was much earlier and his PR was issued sometime in 2007. Do you know the date his release on PR was issued? Every fact from his own site suggest he left Delaware contrary to a court order and had his SSA stopped because he was considered to be fleeing prosecution
He was just in front of the judge in Delaware 2 days ago. He was arrested in DC by the DC police last friday after his press conference. He was taken on monday to DE, where he was let go on his PR. He has been living in Minnesota at least since January, perhaps much longer for all I know. He is writing in this screed about these recent events. Please follow the storyline.
Q. Why was he taken to Delaware?
A. There was an outstanding warrant from Feb 2008
Q. Why would a resident of Minnesota be denied SSA by the State of Delaware?
A. Because, like what he says happened to him before, he was a fugitive from justice.
Q. How do we know he was a fugitive from justice.?
A. Because the warrant is in Delaware and Larry is in Minnesota.
He did not live in Delaware in Feb 2008. Did they serve him notice in Minnesota in Feb 2008 to return to go to Delaware?
SSA stands for Social Security Administration, I think you meant SSI - supplemental security income. And Delaware did not deny it to him, only the SSA can.
You can’t be a fugitive from justice if you do not know a warrant has been issued for your arrest. You can be wanted, but fugitive implies you have been served notice.
You are served notice not to leave the state at the time of your hearing. You can not be served once you flee until they know where you are. The fact that there is a warrant and that you left contrary to a judges order means you are, by definition, a fugitive from justice. Just like he was from Colorado.
HE HAD NO HEARING until last monday. PLEASE follow the story more closely.
how did he get a warrant in February?
Fugitive also implies you don’t show up at Press Conferences in D.C.: fugitives hide.
obumpa
Latest interview of Mr. Sinclair at
Black female cop wanted to arrest Sinclair against detectives orders, but was rebuffed.
I guess he needs 10k.... some GOPer has got that laying around?
10000+ REASON’S THIS IS OVER
Posted by Larry Sinclair on Thursday, June 26, 2008
I am writing this article to inform you all, that their are 10,000+ reason’s why this is over.
FIRST
I met with the Attorney in Delaware this afternoon and he has asked for a retainer of $10,000 which I do not have, and I am not going to stress over this between now and next Thursday.
SECOND
I have gone to the Clerk of the Court in Delaware and I have obtained copies of what little there actually is in the file.
1. The Indictment was ordered and the warrant issued by The Attorney Generals Office of the State of Delaware, not the New Castle County DA as would be the normal process.
2. The Indictment is dated February 4, 2008 and the Rule 9 Warrant ordered and issued by the Delaware State Attorney Generals Office signed by Susan S Dwyer.
3. The Court file states that on February 6, 2008 a Summons was mailed to me for Arraignment on Feb 15, 2008 (a copy of this summons from the court file shows that this did not in fact was not mailed as they did not include any address)
4. On February 11, 2008 the court file shows “SUMMONS SENT BY MAIL RETURNED. INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS, UNABLE TO FORWARD
5. February 15, 2008 “ARRIGNMENT CALENDAR: RULE 9 WARRANT OUTSTANDING. DEFENDANT DID NOT APPEAR.
6. June 23, 2008, “RULE 9 WARRANT RETURNED, BAIL SET AT UNSECURED BOND 3,000, ARS 7/3/08
7. June 23, 2008, ” RULE 9 WARRANT RETURNED, BAIL SET AT UNSECURED BOND 5,000, 7/3/08 ARS
THIRD
The following is the content of the RULE 9 WARRANT (I do not have access to a scanner to scan the document but as soon as I do I will scan it and upload it)
RULE 9 WARRANT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
INDICTMENT BY THE GRAND JURY ID #0712005646
The Grand Jury charges Lawrence W Sinclair with the following offense, a Felony:
THEFT, in violation of Title 11, Section 841 of the Delaware Code of 1974, as amended.
LAWRENCE W. SINCLAIR, on or about the 16th day of October, 2007, in the County of New Castle, State of Delaware, did take, exercise control over, or obtain property of ************************, or another person, consisting of United States Currency or other miscellaneous property valued at $1000.00 or more, intending to deprive that person and/or owner of same, or to appropriate same.
A TRUE BILL
(FOREPERSON)
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, III
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Signed by Susan S. Dwyer
Deputy Attorney General
FOURTH
I know for a fact that the charge stated in the above is not true, but I do not have nor am I going to ask anyone for the funds to retain this attorney. I will appear at the hearing set for July 3, 2008 and I will return to my home in Duluth as best I can and let the process take its due course. For the first time in my life, short a miracle from happening, it looks as if I will indeed engage in my first jury trial. As I have stated before, if I did it, I have admitted it, but this I did not do and I am not going to be harassed, intimidated, or scared into admitting to something I did not do.
FINALLY
It should also be noted that the letters from Social Security terminating my benefits was sent by James F Martin, Regional Commissioner, Chicago Region
So to all of you who believe that the truth is what is important here, you need to go forward and tell the truth. I cannot financially fight this battle and I am not going to be forced into homelessness and/or an earlier death for lack of medical access over this. I have tried to do what was right and I have been beaten up, slandered, attacked, threatened, and more and the powers to be now want to try to put me in the street.
I have been arrested and jailed under outright fraudulent warrants in DC, that came from the US Attorney’s office in DC, I was denied medical treatment and access to medication by a United States Federal Court Judge in DC on a warrant that she knew was non existent, all in the name of protecting a fraud of a presidential candidate.
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/
Consider:
Obama’s legal firm (for his book deal) is Williams & Connolly of DC.
Do some research on who else their clients are.
Hint: Those clients also hired the PI firm of Terry Lenzner & Associates back in the 1990’s. Research what TL was tied to.
LArry sounds like he’s hangin up the spurs. Oh well, it’s time for the media to investigate.
Looks like Sinclair will have a trial in Delaware. Looks like he has a lawyer now, so my question is, can obama be brought to the stand to testify under oath?
“Looks like Sinclair will have a trial in Delaware. Looks like he has a lawyer now, so my question is, can obama be brought to the stand to testify under oath?”
Who knows?
In the interview below, Sinclair talks and answers questions about what transpired from end of press conference to present. He will remain in Deleware to appear in court on July 3rd. Says charges are not true. Says he has never run from charges against him, and will appear on July 3.
Latest interview of Mr. Sinclair Wednesday 25th.
http://www.rense.com/ (Link at bottom of page.)
At the link below more info and links to documents.
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/
Time will tell if what he claims is true.
Obama can be served with a subpoena to testify, but that is only if the presiding judge sees enough relevance to allow it.
Generally, a local judge wouldn’t take it to that level, and might instead allow a limited interrogatory (a written Q&A type of deposition). However, at this point, I see no evidence or reason that could be cited to persuade a judge to include Obama in this case. More relevant, are the roles of Biden Jr’s office, officials at the Press Club, and communications received by the SSA.
Sinclair is asking for an investigation. Unfortunately, as a private citizen without (apparent) financial resources, his is a plea to officials to consider devoting a part of their budgets to publicly support his claims. To my knowledge, there’s scant public response and no official mandate to motivate anyone to do that.
Thanks for last reply, if you have time....
Sinclair posted a bunch of documents, do they carry any weight in your opinion
THE ACTUAL DOCUMENTS FROM THE DC COURT APPEARANCE, FOLLOWED BY THE THREE DOCUMENTS FROM THE 6-23-08 DELAWARE COURT APPEARANCE FOLLOWED BY THE SIX (6) DOCUMENTS PROVIDED BY THE SUPERIOR COURT CLERK IN WILMINGTON, DE ON 6-26-08.
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com
This is no precedent as every RAT administration since 1933 has done the same thing, it's expected of RATs.
The outstanding factual questions would be:
(1)How long did Lawrence W. Sinclair stay at a
Rodeway Inn in Delaware in October 2007:
One day (as he says) or three weeks (as the paper says)?
(2) Did Sinclair pay with a bogus money order?
(3) Did Sinclair use bogus identification
(per the list of alias names on the court document)?
(3) What were the actual damages: $1000, or more?
Based on what is shown, I would conclude the factual
issues would turn on evidence of the length of Sinclair’s
stay. Of relevance, was if Sinclair was pulling yet
another scam (in October, which seems to be about
the time he made his accusations re: Obama).
However, the procedural issues (who interceded
to produce a warrant at the Press Club) might have
a greater weight politically.
A web search, turns up the Rodeway Inn of New Castle, Delaware:
Note: Their nightly room rates range from $58 to $125.
As this indictment is for an amount over $1,000,
that would tend to support the claim that Sinclair
stayed there for 3 weeks.
Except for one issue: I find it unlikely that an Inn
wouldn’t require payment or make a bank deposit,
for up to 3 weeks.
If the money order was bogus, wouldn’t it have been
detected sooner?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.