Posted on 07/03/2008 4:35:19 PM PDT by SE Mom
Jay McKinnon, a self-described Department of Homeland Security-trained document specialist, has implicated himself in the production of fraudulent Hawaii birth certificate images similar to the one endorsed as genuine by the Barack Obama campaign, and appearing on the same blog entry where the supposedly authentic document appears.
The evidence of forgery and manipulation of images of official documents, triggered by Israel Insider's revelation of the collection of Hawaii birth certificate images on the Photobucket site and the detective work of independent investigative journalists and imaging professionals in the three weeks since the publication of the images, implicate the Daily Kos, an extreme left blog site, and the Obama campaign, in misleading the public with official-looking but manipulated document images of doubtful provenance.
The perceived unreliability of the image has provoked petitions and widespread demands for Obama to submit for objective inspection the paper versions of the "birth certificate" he claimed in his book Dreams from My Father was in his possession, as well as the paper version of the Certificate of Live Birth for which the image on the Daily Kos and the Obama "Fight the Smears" website was supposedly generated.
Without a valid birth certificate, Obama cannot prove he fulfills the "natural born citizen" requirement of the Constitution, throwing into doubt his eligibility to run for President.
McKinnon, who says he is 25-30 years old, operates a website called OpenDNA.com and uses the OpenDNA screen name on various web sites and blogs, including his comments and diary on The Daily Kos. In recent years he has divided his time between Long Beach, California and Vancouver, British Columbia. He is a Democratic political activist, frequent contributor to the left wing Daily Kos blog, and a fervent Barack Obama supporter.
(Excerpt) Read more at web.israelinsider.com ...
That photo IS NOT photo shopped so don’t even start. I’m not spending my day proving you wrong. Go search for that picture. It was originally posted by the NYT. Do you think they photo shopped it? There is an entire thread here on FR discussing the “hand” thing.
They are not holding hands. You do not see 2 hands being held. Get a good photo editing program, enlarge it and you will see.
You forgot to delete the fingers.
WRONG~! At the time of his birth she was under age 18 and so unable to confer citizenship to him
My best friend at work was born in UK to american mother age 17 and english father- he could not get a US passport to go on a business trip with us.
The pedophile FMD started pulling the strings in HI when 0b0z0 was just a boy.
The "strings" weren't the strings of power, rather, the strings of briefs.
The pictures in #9383 and #9384 confirm this finding.
whatever
It’s not a coincidence that followers of evil philosophies/belief systems such as Islam and marxism are often sexual perverts as well. Evil consciousness seeps into all facets of a person’s existence.
Right, unless the child was special because of his famous or infamous lineage. For example, the son of a courageous man who had no other male heirs. A son conceived out of wedlock to an underage mother who was impressed by the father's cult following and activist power of the time. The son of a Leader of a Nation. A son used as a pawn in a serious game of knighthood. A boy of three-and-a-half, whose mother only revealed the identity of his father after his untimely death... and a child who was used as a bargaining chip. A boy with a secret known to a few, but when revealed it is instantly understood how so much would be done by so many to pave his way into power for the future. The Great Race Healer! The Man of Peace! The One to Unify the World!
Malikah (mah-LEE'-kah)
Malia (məˈliːə)
Or, BHO, Sr. was an African King.
Where did Sir William Blackstone define “natural born Citizen” in his commentaries on the laws of England?
According to you, he is.
Is he?
Your reading comprehension is nonexistent - and since you want to pick and choose anything from anywhere to attribute to my viewpoint, this will be my last comment to you.
Listen carefully - I have never stated, I have never implied, nor have I ever heard anybody claim, that a person born in one country, to citizens of that country, could be considered a natural born citizen of ANOTHER country. Your question is stupid and infantile. Arnold was born in Thal, Austria. HINT (I can see you're struggling with the connection): Austria <> USA - look it up, they are two different countries - FOR REALS BRAH! Look up the math symbols too, while you're at it, I don't want to leave anything to chance - and in that vein, let me clue you to something your goose-brain might have forgotten: Rubio was born in Miami AND MIAMI IS A CITY IN THE USA!!!
How in all heaven do you claim that my argument on behalf of Rubio (born in the USA, remember?) also argues in favor of Schwarzenegger (born in Austria - that's a few lines back, so you probably forgot that one)??????
Your inanity is childish. Your vapid attempt at straw-man sophistry is infantile! If your cognitive powers are representative of our current crop of natural born citizens, your very existence argues in favor of allowing ONLY naturalized citizens to serve as president!
The obvious stupidity of your question hurts your larger argument and gives credence to those who dump birthers in the the tin-foil-hat drawer.
BTW, sonny boy, it's “Arnie” (SHEESH! What kind of children are we raising here anyway?)
I know, I said I wouldn’t - but since this question came first, I will grant it my royal dispensation.
Another STUPID and childishly nitpicking question:
Blackstone defined Natural Born Subjects, but being citizens not subjects, any THINKING PATRIOT of the time was certainly able to ferret out the meaning of a natural born citizen from Blackstone’s definition of natural born subject...because, you see, he was defining “NATURAL BORN”, you imbecile, not “subject” nor “citizen”! Take my word for it, because you have already proven yourself unable to follow a structured, reasonable argument - so I won’t waste my fingertips.
BTW - if anybody other than rxsid wants to pursue the interesting questions regarding the “natural born” qualifier, I am happy to entertain and engage thoughtful, cogent, logical questions and arguments - but I will not suffer the kind of idiotic, playground tongue-sticking, thumbs-in-ears-finger-wagging, neener-neener waste of band width offered by rxsid in his last two.
...”Kenya was a country that was under British rule for many years, and when Obama was born, information on his birth record would have been given in metric measurements: height, weight, etc. The document I have seen has it in inches and pounds, so it’s totally fraudulent.”
Britain was pounds and ounces and inches till the 70’s and Kenya was when Obamalot was born. The interview is a diversionary red herring.
Your some piece of work aren't you?
Your rant only proves one thing. You know far less on this subjet that you think you know.
You claim Sir William Blackstone is the source for definition for "natural born Citizen."
1. Quote Blackstone's commentaries, from where he defines a natural born Citizen
and, lets look at another class of citizen. The naturalized citizen (like Arny, <--intended spelling).
2. In the Statute 7 Anne, ch. 5: "All persons born out of the ligeanceof Her Majesty, who shall qualify themselves (etc., as therein provided) shall be deemed, adjudged and taken to be natural born subjects of Ireland, to all intents, constructions and purposes, as if they had been born within the said kingdom." So in the Statute 13 Geo. II.. ch. 5, naturalizing foreigo Protestants in America, it is enacted that they "shall be deemed, adjudged and taken, to be His Majesty's natural born subjects, to all intents, purposes and constructions, as if they had been born within this kingdom." So again, by 2 Geo. III., 25, certain foreign officers and soidiers, who had served in America, are naturalized in the same words, "to be deemed and adjudged, as if they had been born within the realm." These seem to be the uniform opera tive words; and their legal effect, as stated by all the authorities is, "that an alien is put in exactly the same state as if he had been born in the King's dominions," 2 Bl. Com., 374; or, in the language of Ld. Coke, "is to all intents and purposes a natural born subject." From the very words employed, then (unless there be some restrictive condition added) every such naturalization must relate back to the time of birth of the individual. The naturalized subject is, in the eye of the English law, one native 354*] *born.
Certainly if you opine that Sir William Blackstone was the source for the definition for natural born Citizen because the framers contorted the idea of a subject into that of a citizen when instead of simply using the definition for "natural born Citizen" provided to them from a source the relied upon to declare independence and when "raising a state"...that you MUST believe that he was their source for who is a naturalized citizen and what they are. Right? Because, if Blackstone was it, Arny would be eligible because English law said he would be considered a "natural born Subject."
So, your saying you believe Sir William Blackstone was NOT the source of our laws on naturalization? If he wasn't, then from where did they get their views on naturalization?
Georgia Administrative Court, 26 January 2012.
GA judge hears Obama's citizenship caseUpdated: Thursday, January 26, 2012 4:19 PM EST
Atlanta, GA (WXIA) - A hearing wrapped up this morning to determine if President Obama can be on Georgia's ballot this November.
The president was actually called to the Administrative Court in Georgia. Subpoenaed to show up.
A complaint was filed with the Secretary of State's office challenging the president's citizenship and therefore the legality of having his name on the ballot.
The president did not attend but that didn't stop the hearing from going on. Similar complaints have been filed in other states. None have been successful.
President Obama has long made his birth certificate and other documents proving his citizenship available to the public.
The Georgia complaint wants to keep Obama's name off the state's presidential primary ballot in march.
Attorney Orly Taitz said, "Mr. Obama had an opportunity to appeal here and show valid documents, certified documents with embossed seal of his birth certificate."
There has not been a date set for the decision to be released.
. . . . BOOKMARK
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.