Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Housing Bubble Correction Update: Fasten your seat belts, here comes the jobs crash
iTulip ^ | July 2, 2008 | Fred

Posted on 07/10/2008 10:23:46 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Housing Bubble Correction Update: Fasten your seat belts, here comes the jobs crash

The housing market has fallen hard but it's not time to buy, no matter what you hear. Depending on where you live it's time to decide if you can afford not to sell before prices go lower, or grin and bear it. The choice depends on your likely future employment prospects and where you live.

In our first major update in our series of housing bubble forecasts since 2006 that began with our August 2002 Yes, it's a housing bubble analysis, we delve into the next phase of the housing bubble correction: regional housing price crashes caused by rising unemployment and falling incomes, especially in any state that has a poorly diversified economy not tied to energy or food production. The rate of growth in unemployment in some states may shock you, but our analysis turns up some positive surprises as well.

(Excerpt) Read more at itulip.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: bubble; housing; layoffs; recession
This is an absolute must read. iTulip has been correct about the housing bubble every step of the way. Even if you disagree, they make a lot of compelling points and anyone with an interest in housing should at least read and digest this analysis.
1 posted on 07/10/2008 10:30:01 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Falling house prices is a GOOD thing! Would you want car prices to double just because you own a car?


2 posted on 07/10/2008 10:37:36 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Travis McGee; Attention Surplus Disorder; bruinbirdman; Vet_6780; NVDave; ...

Ping. A must read.


3 posted on 07/10/2008 10:45:45 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

The sky is falling... we are all going to die!!!

Buy now... buy often.... sell when the time is right.


4 posted on 07/10/2008 10:47:10 PM PDT by Porterville (I hasten karmic justice through revenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Porterville

I always buy high and sell low.

Eliminates stress./s


5 posted on 07/10/2008 10:49:27 PM PDT by exit82 (People get the government they deserve--and they are about to get it --in spades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: exit82

sarcasm?... then you never play.


6 posted on 07/10/2008 10:53:23 PM PDT by Porterville (I hasten karmic justice through revenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

I am both a mortgage broker and realtor and you can take this to the bank: prices of bank owned properties have dropped to the point that a rational buyer sees a bargain. At least in AZ, I think we reached a bottom in April and are coming back up. When the price of homes dips below replacement cost, people will buy, and they are in spades. Most reasonably priced bank owned have MANY offers.


7 posted on 07/10/2008 10:54:18 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ("It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoosier-Daddy; exit82; Porterville; Still Thinking

It appears that not a single one of you has read the article.

The article is not about housing. They are projecting future unemployment rates caused by the collapse of housing. The article is fascinating and is presented clearly but with an astounding level of detail. There is a ton of compelling information presented in the article for anyone who will bother to read it. Not just about housing, not just about projected unemployment, but about many economic topics besides those two.

This is a compelling article and even if you disagree with their projections, anyone reading this article stands to learn a great many things.

Please click on the link and take the time to read the article. It is very thought provoking.


8 posted on 07/10/2008 11:02:01 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Thank you, thank you for posting! I’m in the middle of making some large financial decisions and this was very informative and written in laymen’s terms.


9 posted on 07/10/2008 11:06:20 PM PDT by 444Flyer (Marriage=1 man+1 woman! Vote "YES" on Prop 8, amend the Calif. State Constitution this November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
From the article...
10 posted on 07/10/2008 11:07:05 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hoosier-Daddy
I am both a mortgage broker and realtor and you can take this to the bank: prices of bank owned properties have dropped to the point that a rational buyer sees a bargain. At least in AZ, I think we reached a bottom in April and are coming back up. When the price of homes dips below replacement cost, people will buy, and they are in spades. Most reasonably priced bank owned have MANY offers.

That's good to hear, but this article is about the job market. If people have lost their jobs, they will not contribute to the economy, they will not buy houses, and they may lose their homes. And you don't even have to lose your job, you only have to fear that you will lose it. You may have reached the bottom, but you may stay there for a long time too.

11 posted on 07/10/2008 11:11:34 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

No, I did read the article and the information is fascinating.

It stands to reason that jobs will now be jettisoned as companies stuggle with rising costs. I’ve lived through this cycle a few times.

I just posted what I did so I wouldn’t slit my wrists.


12 posted on 07/10/2008 11:11:46 PM PDT by exit82 (People get the government they deserve--and they are about to get it --in spades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

The point of this article is to project the increase in unemployment in the various states and to evaluate how that rising unemployment will impact home prices. It is something of a double-whammy. House prices go down, unemployment goes up, and unemployed people can’t afford homes which causes prices to go down further.

But the analysis is not simplistic. The analyst takes into account the various state economies and how that will impact unemployment and the resulting additional drag on home values in those states.

It is an exceptional article and well worth reading. As you can see from above, Rhode Island has seen the greatest increase in unemployment in the last year. Who would have thought that? I certainly wouldn’t.

Who would have thought that South Dakota would be poised to experience the least unemployment and the least damage to the price of houses?

Again, you may not agree with their assessment, but it is well worth taking the time to digest.


13 posted on 07/10/2008 11:13:04 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

In that chart, all of the states except Wisconsin that are reducing unemployment can be explained by the boom in energy prices.


14 posted on 07/10/2008 11:14:35 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: exit82

Hopefully your homes state is not one of the ones experiencing an increase in unemployment. I guess the odds are against that. I am an hour out of Sacramento, California and I agree with their assessment that unemployment is going to go way up, perhaps even double as they say.

I found their claim very interesting that the best leading indicator of future unemployment is duration of unemployment. We can see that job loss is not yet that bad, but the number of months people are going without work is indeed going up and they are saying that is a leading indicator of soaring future job losses. I have never heard that before. So I’ll be watching future unemployment numbers very carefully to verify or discount their claim. Very interesting.


15 posted on 07/10/2008 11:21:40 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

I thought they made that clear in their analysis.


16 posted on 07/10/2008 11:22:46 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer

You are welcome. I was compelled to post it because it is a fantastic article, well written and because they source has so far been absolutely correct about the magnitude and duration of the housing bubble, and about its aftermath. They are predicting a very, very long time before housing truly recovers and it remains to be seen if this ruins their track record of being right about the housing bubble.

So far they have been dead right, and I am inclined to take a validated source much more seriously than one that has proven to be dead wrong over time. Industry analysts, talking heads, and bloggers who first said their was no housing bubble, and later kept calling bottoms and saying that prices would not go down this far, have absolutely no credibility. I would rather pay credence to those who have been proven so far to be right.


17 posted on 07/10/2008 11:29:19 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

WARNING! This article is only going to be available for free to the general public for 2 days, until July 12th. If you bookmark for later read, there will BE NO LATER READ. After July 12th, the article will not be accessible unless you are a subscriber to iTulip.

I heavily recommend you MAKE THE TIME to read this analysis while it is available for free. If I sound like a commecial, oh well... But on July 13th, this knowledge is going to be lost to you, so read it or weep. You won’t get another chance.


18 posted on 07/10/2008 11:34:56 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

I think their theory is correct. The housing collapse is one stage. Job loss is another stage and it follows the housing collapse.

What makes this time more ominous is that people are extended in credit, have no hard assets to fall back on,and are without savings. The things they have are not commodities to be exchanged, but toys that do not hold value, on a scale not seen before in America.

My state is Delaware and we have seen this rise in unemployment. In southern Delaware, where I live, the housing market is still fluid, as there is an influx of retirees coming into new housing due to the favorable tax climate here. That has offset a stalling of the non retiree portions of the housing market. House-on-market times for resales of 12 or more months is not uncommon.

More retirees would come but they cannot sell their existing homes yet, and that has stalled many new developments.

After 9/11 I never would have thought we could bounce back and have six good years after that. But this oil price rise will now affect every economic sector, whereas in the past, only some sectors were affected by changes in the economy.


19 posted on 07/10/2008 11:41:58 PM PDT by exit82 (People get the government they deserve--and they are about to get it --in spades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
Their outlook for my state of California...

Ground Zero state

National Unemployment Growth Rank: 4

Macro-economic Vulnerability: High

Unemployment Growth Rate: High

Estimated Post Recession Peak Unemployment Rate: 10%

Future Home Values Rating: Poor

20 posted on 07/10/2008 11:42:28 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

I read the whole thing and I’m glad I live in Texas. According to this, we will be the least affected by a recession. Y’all come on down.


21 posted on 07/10/2008 11:43:07 PM PDT by Marcella (Will work in my rose garden (with wine) and not listen to McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82

Excellent thoughts. Thanks.


22 posted on 07/10/2008 11:44:30 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Article mentions “total cost of ownership” for a house. 5 years into home ownership, folks who are living paycheck to paycheck are going to be hurting. Those cheap roofs on the cookie cutter homes are going to need work, paint fades, air conditioners go out - and so on.


23 posted on 07/10/2008 11:44:38 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

Makes up for the mid-1980s. I had friends who went through the oil depression and it was brutal. I had friends who lost their homes, all the while the national economy was doing just great. So as bad as Texas was hit in the mid-1980s, you deserve a boom at this time. Enjoy it while it lasts because it won’t last forever, so ride it for all its worth! Everything goes in cycles.


24 posted on 07/10/2008 11:48:59 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

They seem to think everything through, right to the fact that cash-strapped home owners won’t be able to afford to maintain their houses, and that will hurt property values even more. I hate the term “perfect storm”, but it seems appropriate when you look at all the factors that are combining to push house prices lower.

Sacramento area homes are down 30%-40% from peak and some people are calling them bargains and buying them now. This article provides some excellent food for thought whether current prices can truly be thought of as bargains in light of the escalating factors that are poised to push home values much further down.

It may not be a bad time to buy a house, but the conclusion of the article is that it is not a good time to buy a house unless you live in one of the states that is experiencing economic growth and won’t be affected by the rest of the national recession.


25 posted on 07/10/2008 11:55:37 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
In that chart, all of the states except Wisconsin that are reducing unemployment can be explained by the boom in energy prices.

E-T-H-A-N-O-L
26 posted on 07/11/2008 12:02:00 AM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
Hmm... this means there would be many cheap houses in coming years, but people may not even be able to afford them, either. Ghost houses and ghost towns.
27 posted on 07/11/2008 12:12:59 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

July 11 — Treasuries fell the most in three weeks after the New York Times said the U.S. may take over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac if they keep deteriorating.

Notes slid and Asian stocks rallied as the newspaper reported the government may place the two-largest buyers of U.S. home loans under conservatorship, citing unidentified officials briefed on the plan. Ten-year yields may rise because efforts to help the companies ``should cause the flight-to-quality bid to fade,’’ Bank of America Corp. strategists led by Michael Cloherty in New York wrote in a report yesterday.

``The government needs to bail out those companies,’’ said Akira Takei, the general manager for international bonds at Mizuho Asset Management Co. in Tokyo, who helps oversee the equivalent of $37.3 billion. ``That will be bad for the U.S. Treasury market.’’

The yield on the benchmark 10-year note increased 7 basis points to 3.86 percent as of 7:33 a.m. in London, according to bond broker BGCantor Market Data. The price of the 3.875 percent security due in May 2018 declined 17/32, or $5.31 per $1,000 face amount, to 100 3/32. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point.

The MSCI Asia Pacific Index of regional shares rose 0.3 percent, erasing an earlier loss and curbing demand for debt.

Fannie Mae slid 14 percent yesterday to $13.20 in New York, down 67 percent this year. Freddie Mac declined 22 percent to $8. Their shares are plunging and their borrowing costs are climbing as investors speculate losses at the companies totaling $11 billion in recent months will keep increasing, the newspaper report said.


28 posted on 07/11/2008 12:22:57 AM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
I thought it interesting that the article points out:

"This is where the right government policy moves will prove critical. Not politically expedient and uncreative wasted efforts to reflate the housing bubble or support home prices but tax reductions on the productive economy and other policies that reinforce the healthy parts of the US economy to provide real, sustainable employment: manufacturing, education, health care, energy, alternative energy, agriculture, and infrastructure development."

There is an answer to this whole mess, tax reductions, and congress could do it if they wanted to, but they won't. When are we going to demand that they do it? We just keep skirting around the real problem and solution, blaming oil companies, and mortgage companies, and putting bandades (like the stimulus checks) on it. All that is to keep from talking about the only real solution and one that no politician wants to do as it takes away their power over us.......... LOWER TAXES, and the economy will recover. Or better yet, enact the Fair Tax.

29 posted on 07/11/2008 12:41:58 AM PDT by Apple Pan Dowdy (... as American as Apple Pie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free; TigerLikesRooster

” I had friends who lost their homes, all the while the national economy was doing just great “

I’ve been hearing more and more ‘expert’ commentators, of late, making a distinction between “The Economy” and “The *Real* Economy” — one being a construct of overly massaged statistics and willful denial of inconvenient facts, and the other being where us great unwashed struggle to live.

In the ‘Real’ economy, my employer (a large big-box retailer - think ‘orange’) has quietly shed roughly 40% of its hourly labor force (through attrition) over the past year, and in the ‘rosy’ employment world of the ‘experts’, there is a real shortage of equivalent jobs out there for those of us who wish to abandon ship....

Make of that what you will....


30 posted on 07/11/2008 1:08:35 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Sometimes I sets and thinks, and sometimes I jus' sets.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

read later


31 posted on 07/11/2008 2:03:44 AM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Great article. It supports what most reasonable people have been observing and saying for the past eight years.


32 posted on 07/11/2008 2:31:45 AM PDT by meadsjn (Socialists promote neighbors selling out their neighbors; Free Traitors promote just the opposite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

It is very useful. The compilers of this do understand some economics. They also understand that the people in government with their hands on the levers they have inserted into the body of the Economy do not understand economics.If Hussein becomes president with the sort of Congress that appears to be in the cards, the responses will all be in the direction of taking over real estate and energy as government monopolies either in the Soviet form of outright nationalization or in the German form by disdaining paper title but micromanaging the industries as de facto owners.


33 posted on 07/11/2008 6:09:15 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

I live in Florida. It is not just the housing decline which will afflict my resort town. The yankee tourists are declining in number noticeably. The business and rentals at the extreme ends of the resort area on this beach show the effects first and much worse than in the middle. If overall tourism declines by 5% the ends will suffer multiples of that because the vacancies in the middle are filled up by those whose tardiness in making arrangements last year left them out on the fringes and they get to be closer in this year.


34 posted on 07/11/2008 6:14:36 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
"Falling house prices is a GOOD thing! Would you want car prices to double just because you own a car?"

What goes down will come back up, which could be a good thing for the person aware of and prepared for this fact of life. But the main difference between housing prices and car prices are that everyone expects (or at least should) the value of a car they own to decline.

For most people, a house is an investment, that will likely fund their retirement at some point. Falling prices here, especially for those whose only source of information is the lamestream media, can be quite gut wrenching.

35 posted on 07/11/2008 6:17:30 AM PDT by HangThemHigh (Entropy's not what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

Read NOW.


36 posted on 07/11/2008 6:20:18 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

The kind of things that I notice is the value of a Dollar, which has dropped 30% during the Bush administration. Yes, I know the benefits of the cheaper dollar in reference to trade. I also have noticed the thousands of American businesses that have sold controlling interest in the past couple of years.

During the next few years we are going to see businesses make decisions that we will consider to be idiotic. That would be true but we’ll have forgotten that those businesses now have foreigners controlling them.

Then I look for wage increases across the board, not just one or two industries. How long has it been since you had a wage increase? Most folks can’t name when theirs was.

Yes, America is in trouble.


37 posted on 07/11/2008 8:05:00 AM PDT by B4Ranch (Having custody of a loaded weapon does not arm you. The skill to use the weapon is what arms a man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Very good read and I agree. Though housing and jobs, like politics is local. Some areas will and others won’t be as affected by the slow down. You probably know this, however.

I think if Obama gets in and starts raising taxes we’ll see a far longer stretch before the economy starts going again.


38 posted on 07/11/2008 8:27:15 AM PDT by jjm2111 (Are we going to have a Daily Dose of McCain?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
This is not a sky is falling article either. I think it is very realistic overview of the continuing domino effect of the housing bubble. In my opinion, it's not pessimistic, it's realistic. It didn't completely cover the very real risks of current and future overall inflation (food, gas etc.) let alone the possibility of a fire up in the ME which could easily send regular gas to $7.00 and up a gallon, and diesel to who knows what. It will be bad enough if the Dems take POTUS and Congress this November. God help us.
39 posted on 07/11/2008 9:40:40 AM PDT by 444Flyer (Marriage=1 man+1 woman! Vote "YES" on Prop 8, amend the Calif. State Constitution this November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
Here we underline energy costs in our 2005 forecast because a serious increase in energy prices and its impact on housing prices was not widely expected. We forecast it because we expected ongoing dollar depreciation in the wake of the housing bubble collapse.
Right on target.  Energy and Food costs:  Tyranny of the appetite.   
 
The Appetite of Tyranny always feeds upon the Tyranny of the Appetite - and the big squeeze is on; however, rather than plotting against TBTB,  perhaps it would be wiser for independent Americans to respond by reducing their dependency upon oil and learning how to grow their own food - Learn to be Independent (The Bwitish Woyals and their Rhodesian Quisling puppets really hate that word) again.  
 
As Orwell showed in 1984, plots against TBTB are predictable and expected; and prerequisite for justifying the imposition of the desired police state.  Better to turn the tables on TBTB and deprive them of their ant-farm.    It's hard to run a Technocracy without any cooperating Techies. 
 
Render unto Caesar what is his... but YOU are not Caesar's:
1 John 4:4-5
4 You, dear children, are from God and have overcome them, because the one who is in you is greater than the one who is in the world.
NIV
Go back to Church, and rebuild those faith-based communities.
 
 
Put the Heartland back in the Homeland!   
 
 
 
 A small number of states are what we call Energy Price Inflation States. The housing bubble left them mostly untouched and now they are benefiting from high energy and food prices. Examples are Oklahoma and Wyoming. These states are seeing either flat or, in the case of Oklahoma, falling unemployment.
 
Hence the persistent "Drill Drill Drill" mantra of the Quisling Oil Bugs here on FR.  Are there any American oil companies left... or has BP and their Saudi petrodollars bought them all?
 
How interesting the manufactured financial/housing "crisis" has led almost directly to the call for the exploitation of American Natural Resources - Drill! Drill! Drill!
 
American natural resources should be developed BY Americans, FOR Americans.
 
Americans are folks who remember that the purpose of America is "to secure these rights".     Pretty Simple.
 
Sooo...
 
Hey BP, GTHOOMC! - 'cause WE didn't vote for your monarchies.
 
 

40 posted on 07/11/2008 9:46:34 AM PDT by LomanBill (A bird flies because the right wing opposes the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
LOL!

I will NOW! I'm home from work!

41 posted on 07/11/2008 12:46:53 PM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

bump for a must read


42 posted on 07/12/2008 11:24:02 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson