Skip to comments.Polarik’s final report: Obama’s ‘Born’ Conspiracy - A FRAUD
Posted on 11/25/2008 8:29:10 AM PST by OL Hickory
While doing research on Leo Dinofrio I was led to this site.(Len Lamphere) while in the middle of reading the article about "Polarik" the Len Lamphere site crashed (AS of 11:25am EST) The source URL is cashed from google..click on url and scroll halfway down till you see this: Polariks final report: Obamas Born Conspiracy - A FRAUD
What the heck is going on?
You said — “What the heck is going on?”
I don’t know..., what do you think is going on?
I think a noob has gone off his meds ... but that's probably just a knee jerk reaction on my part.
works for me.
Are you logged on?
I won’t read it ... anybody want to synopsize?
Well, we’ll see if this becomes a typical “hit and run” posting... I hope not, but it appears that this poster is doing that, here...
Finally,I am back in
I was reading something and then nada.There is so much info with this Obama Birth stuff I can’t keep up. I read the entire post by polarik, now Len is calling it a fraud?
Henceforth my question “what the heck is going on?
This thing has more twists and turns then the nile river.
Every time I get excited and think we finally got him on the BC, the source in question gets debunked AAARRGGGHHHH!!!
why are people saying polarik is a fraud? looks like a good piece to me. i heard his evidence is getting attached to 2 of the current cases. so i dont know why people are calling him a fraud. i feel research is authentic to me
Who is saying Polarik is a fraud?
No, what you see is :
UPDATE - Polariks final report: Obamas Born Conspiracy - Forged images, phony photos, and felony fraud
Then explain this off the website:
It has come to our attention that the so called evidence being presented on ObamaCrimes.com in regard to Dr. Polariks final report on the Barack Obama Hawaiian Birth Certificate is a complete fraud!
The Lan Lamphere site contains a link to the full FR article
Polarik’s final report: Obama’s ‘Born’ Conspiracy Forged images, phony photos, and felony fraud
From the website, Lan is not calling Polarik a fraud. Lan is referencing an email that said:
“There is a great deal of interest and conversation about Dr. Ron Polariks paper on the alleged forged Obama Birth Certificate involving a number of commenters. There is one commenter in particular who appears to be a dyed in the wool provocateur and has just now asserted unequivocally in his posting that Dr. Polarik is a phony and doesnt exist at all”
Over and out
My head is going to explode!! I want to nail obama for fraud just as much as the next guy.....I have been tracing all theories,conspiracies and old fashion tea leaves, just for one domino to make the others fall.. If I misread I apologize, but on the life of my dog...
that site crashed at around 11:25 and I couldn’t read or access anymore.
This link is a complete research report by Polarik showing why he believes the BC Obama submitted is a forgery.
Polarik’s work is an exceptional analysis and very throrough breakdown of a perfectly clear clase of document fraud.
On what basis do you make your statements?
Where are the accusations challenging his work by professional document analysis teams?
Please do not include the statements of party hacks.
professional is someone form out of town that nobody knows
“professional is someone form out of town that nobody knows”
EXACTLY...I googled Polarik...
He doesn’t exist until the berg case
Thank you for the link. I’m just sending the research to a bunch of non-freepers who will be interested.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.