Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do not use Google.

Posted on 12/01/2008 5:38:19 PM PST by jetxnet

Google's CEO is *still* funding Obama, even after the election. What does he expect in return?


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Government
KEYWORDS: censorship; ericschmidt; google; googleconscensor; googlecorrupt; googledems; googlessp; internet; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-70 next last
Google's CEO is *still* funding Obama, even after the election. What does he expect in return?

It's no secret that Google wants to basically own the Internet from Youtube to you name it. They want to be to the Internet what Microsoft was to desktops.

What would Obama get in return for having Congress pass Internet regulations that only favor Google? Google will collect data via searches and censor information not privy to the Government view.

Can you say "Communism", no different than China and Google has already censored information relative to Obama searches. It is fact. Google is guilty of censorship in favor of their Candidate etc.

Do not use Google.

1 posted on 12/01/2008 5:38:20 PM PST by jetxnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

DOGPILE.com
http://www.dogpile.com


2 posted on 12/01/2008 5:39:24 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

dogpile still searches google...


3 posted on 12/01/2008 5:42:43 PM PST by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

Is there a better alternative? I remember switching once before, and I think the new service was even worse.

Google has been pretty good about not abusing its potential as spyware, unlike many earlier search services.

I agree, they are on the left, but is any other search service better?


4 posted on 12/01/2008 5:46:31 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

“They want to be to the Internet what Microsoft was to desktops. “

Haven’t you heard, they aren’t limiting themselves to the internet. They are working on hosted applications to compete with MS office and other popular applications.

They have come out with a cell phone.

They want to store your medical records.

They give you search results based on what your government wants you to see.


5 posted on 12/01/2008 5:48:27 PM PST by driftdiver (No More Obama! - The corruption has not changed despite all our hopes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Yes, but dogpile gets the credit for the search.


6 posted on 12/01/2008 5:49:56 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Cuil is supposed to be good


7 posted on 12/01/2008 5:50:29 PM PST by pvoce ('Good' sense and 'Common' sense are two entirely different concepts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

That is like saying “don’t use the Internet.”

There may be more effective strategies for undermining Google’s revenue than simply “don’t use.”

But it is good that you point out the bias that has started to be very prevalent and unhidable (not a word, I know) in the Google universe.


8 posted on 12/01/2008 5:54:46 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Der neuen Fuhrer: AKA the Murdering Messiah: Keep your powder dry, folks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

Here’s a good article. ‘Burning Man’ says it all.

http://www.slate.com/id/2193482/


9 posted on 12/01/2008 5:55:34 PM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
What he expects is a very large chunk of the soon to be released broadcast airwaves once TV is switched over in Feb of 2009 to a digital signal. This would give Google a clear advantage in developing a nationwide high speed wireless Internet service ability. There's been a big fight being waged over the allocation of these airwaves in Washington for the past several years now. Just follow the money it usually leads you to the stinking pile of guts these big money vultures fight over.
10 posted on 12/01/2008 5:57:57 PM PST by Reflex (SSCDD (same socialist crapola different day))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Google is garbage and so is their stupid browser, its total garbage. A few months ago I downloaded it, looked at it, laughed, then uninstalled it. I hope google goes down the drain


11 posted on 12/01/2008 5:59:01 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Agreed on both points.

The chances however, are slim.


12 posted on 12/01/2008 6:01:12 PM PST by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

I love google services sorry.

However that said I don’t send or pay for any google services and I got enough ad-block software so I never see google ads either.

You can have my gmail/calendar when you pry it from my cold dead computer!


13 posted on 12/01/2008 6:15:10 PM PST by Domandred (Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet
Down the road, Google will ultimately be taken over by the government anyhow.

Just as the broadcast airwaves belong to “the people” so will the narrowcast entities be forced into the “public domain.”

Google operators will get their justs. Too bad that they have to screw all of us first.

14 posted on 12/01/2008 6:22:01 PM PST by Radix (Posting cynical responses ever since...."What time is it anyhow?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

Unfortunately, Goggle is the best, most comprehensive, and the fastest to get new material of all the search engines.


15 posted on 12/01/2008 6:48:13 PM PST by Theodore R. (The most frightening words in the English language: The American people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pvoce

Cuil is several years let behind Google in comprehensiveness.


16 posted on 12/01/2008 6:49:28 PM PST by Theodore R. (The most frightening words in the English language: The American people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

I use clusty.com because I heard they are better with your privacy....but I don’t know their politics. I am extremely happy with Clusty and AVOID using Google wherever and whenever possible.


17 posted on 12/01/2008 6:51:11 PM PST by conservaDave (You can't ignore the democRAT...He's a menace to health, home and industry...kill him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

Is there any other search engine? Before Google came out, I used to use Excite and some others I’ve already forgotten.


18 posted on 12/01/2008 6:52:22 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

Google gets income every time you do a search on it? Who knew?!


19 posted on 12/01/2008 6:52:58 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Everytime they open their mouth they shoot themselves in the foot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Am I ignorant, or is it very hard to get a true Boolean search out of Google? That’s what I miss about the old days with Excite and so on.


20 posted on 12/01/2008 6:53:28 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

Use Google, just do not click on the ads.

And do alot of searches for GUNS.


21 posted on 12/01/2008 6:59:25 PM PST by Red in Blue PA (Little known fact: Barack Obama translated into Kenyan means "Jimmy Carter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

of course you can get a true Boolean out of google...what makes you think this is impossible?


22 posted on 12/01/2008 7:03:22 PM PST by superfries
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

I’ve been using Yahoo as an alternative. Seems fine for my needs.


23 posted on 12/01/2008 7:06:33 PM PST by Exit148 (Giants versus Jets? How 'bout a tie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

I throw darts at my DSL modem. Works every time!


24 posted on 12/01/2008 7:07:52 PM PST by Redcloak ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Sometimes ask.com is what I use.


25 posted on 12/01/2008 7:11:16 PM PST by mathluv (The Barracuda and the Maverick will take on the Messiah and the Mouth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

You signed up last week to tell us that? ;-)


26 posted on 12/01/2008 7:12:29 PM PST by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathluv

Thank you for the link Mathluv.


27 posted on 12/01/2008 7:13:28 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Try Scroogle (Screw Google)

Scroogle

28 posted on 12/01/2008 7:23:23 PM PST by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: arasina

I use Scroogle and I LOVE it!


29 posted on 12/01/2008 7:28:10 PM PST by Tucker822 (RUN, FRED, RUN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

Bump!


30 posted on 12/01/2008 7:29:52 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Obama - not just an empty suit - - A Suit Bomb invading the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

Bump!


31 posted on 12/01/2008 7:29:57 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Obama - not just an empty suit - - A Suit Bomb invading the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

You are welcome, Cindy. I like it because I can put the info I am looking for in the form of a question.


32 posted on 12/01/2008 7:31:49 PM PST by mathluv (The Barracuda and the Maverick will take on the Messiah and the Mouth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

I really don’t like being told what or what no to do by newbies.


33 posted on 12/01/2008 7:32:52 PM PST by JustaDumbBlonde (America: Home of the Free Because of the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: superfries

Don’t have to be flippant. Just tell me how.

I’ve never really tried it, but it doesn’t say you can. I’ve used Advanced for a long time but it’s really not perfect.


34 posted on 12/01/2008 7:38:14 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mathluv

It was “AskJeeves”, and way back then I recall being on some website on which AJ was a banner ad, and it sampled some obnoxious sexual thing in its ad! I wrote them right away and asked why did they have to put out sexual stuff on an ad?


35 posted on 12/01/2008 7:40:23 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

“dogpile still searches google...”

Better than using ONLY google, but do you know of any search engines that are good that don’t use google?


36 posted on 12/01/2008 8:07:16 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

I was wondering who was paying for that $30,000.00 ring.


37 posted on 12/01/2008 8:08:00 PM PST by divine_moment_of_facts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tucker822

Scroogle is great just for the commentary alone...no annoying ads, either.


38 posted on 12/01/2008 8:12:53 PM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sun

See post #28...


39 posted on 12/01/2008 8:14:38 PM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

Thank you.

How does Scroogle work? Do they use Google, but bypass the spying?


40 posted on 12/01/2008 8:24:44 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

>> Is there a better alternative?

Try “Clusty”. Anything you search for on Google is stored - forever. Not so with Clusty.


41 posted on 12/01/2008 8:59:45 PM PST by QBFimi2 (Ve are the New World Order; ve bring to the world dis-order. Spike Jones, 1943.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

Not sure how my comments were taken to be flippant but here is how google supports Boolean....they also support many other commands but since you are already using “advanced search” you probably already know that.

Boolean search is nothing more than AND OR and NOT commands. Google supports all three as does every search engine I can think of.

Here is an example...cut and paste this into a google search box....

FAR “subcontract administrator” (intitle:resume OR inurl:resume) -job -jobs -send -submit -you

This search utilizes the AND command the OR command and the NOT command. AND is signified by the space between FAR and subcontract administrator” the OR is signified by the OR between (intitle:resume and inurl:resume) and the NOT is signified by the minus sign after the search string telling you not to show you pages that contain the words job/jobs/send/submit and you.

So if the search worked right you should have returned the resumes of several subcontract administrators with FAR experience whose intilte and inurl pages does not contain the words job/jobs/submit/send and you.


42 posted on 12/02/2008 8:23:24 AM PST by superfries
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: superfries

Thanks. I simply never tried to do Boolean there because it didn’t invite me to as the old engines did (with “help” for rules, etc). I assumed you couldn’t do it - further by the fact they have an “Advanced” page. Which is really only half-baked.


43 posted on 12/02/2008 5:23:33 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Hi Cicero, I’ve found Yahoo to be very good .. made major improvements. I’ve found things there that I couldn’t on Google.

Google started with Yahoo’s database, so many of the searches are inherently the same.

Do and search on both, and you’ll see what I mean.

Google makes it’s money on traffic, if half the US were to ban Google, they would lose sponsored advertisers etc.

Search engines really are simplistic. Most novice programmers can create them in matter of a few days or less with many features.

It’s just that Google has been majorly hyped in the movies over the years.

I have yet to find something on Google i couldn’t find with Yahoo.


44 posted on 12/03/2008 11:55:39 PM PST by jetxnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
Google is garbage and so is their stupid browser, its total garbage.

It's spyware by default. That by itself is a non-starter for me setting aside the fact it has little cookie management and zero for javascript.

45 posted on 12/04/2008 6:08:54 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

Google is turning into RealPlayer, shoving themselves in everyone’s face and trying to take over your system. If the OEMs allow their spyware browser to be the default at installation then they are part of the problem and not the solution. It’s bad enough we’ve got IE but I’d argue even that’s not as bad as Chrome despite the standards problem.


46 posted on 12/04/2008 6:15:30 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet

Thanks. My daughter seems to have a Yahoo toolbar on her computer, and it seemed to work perfectly well. But isn’t Yahoo also liberal?

I don’t use the toolbar on my computer, but the IE7 Search window, which gives you a choice of what provider you want to use. I think that keeps the footprint smaller and uses less memory.


47 posted on 12/04/2008 7:51:48 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Jason Lewis did recommend Dogpile as well and he is a conservative radio talk show host.

I wonder if I can get google off the opening page of the browser for firefox? It’s really not that important of a question though.


48 posted on 12/04/2008 8:06:17 AM PST by RGPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RGPII

Open firefox, go to tools, properties and make Freerepublic or whatever you want your starting page.


49 posted on 12/04/2008 12:35:33 PM PST by SolidWood (Sarah Palin - Everything that is Sweetness and Light! WE STAND WITH HER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

My absolute favorite! Been a fan for many years.


50 posted on 12/04/2008 12:41:30 PM PST by RedDogzRule (God bless America...because God knows we need it, especially now...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson