Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Pernicious "Natural Born" Clause of the Constitution: (John Dean questions it)
findLaw ^ | oct 8th 2004 | John Dean

Posted on 12/02/2008 10:12:22 AM PST by OL Hickory

2 cases are listed in the article..

Can anyone summarize for me?


TOPICS: Education; Government; Politics; Reference
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; born; certifigate; constitution; natural; obama; obamacon; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; stbc
from NJ, and public school..need help (SARC)
1 posted on 12/02/2008 10:12:24 AM PST by OL Hickory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory
At first I thought a blind little piggy had finally found a nut was referring to the anchor baby aspect of the 14th amendment.

Then I realized he's just being a good little toad, as usual, and providing an assist to the farcical Obama administration.

2 posted on 12/02/2008 10:16:27 AM PST by skeeter (Its Barry's fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory
These 2...

In fact, there are conflicting holdings that only further compound the problem of understanding this clause. United States v. Wong Kim Ark(1898) indicates that foreign born children of Americans are not natural born. But in contrast, Weedin v. Chin Bow (1927) holds that "at common law the children of our citizen born abroad were always natural born citizen from the standpoint of this government."

3 posted on 12/02/2008 10:16:28 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (You cannot help the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory
The famous John Dean who brought down Richard Nixon while trying to protect his wife's prostitution connection.
4 posted on 12/02/2008 10:18:39 AM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory
from the link:
"Accordingly, the natural born citizenship requirement has been treated as a similar absolute. And this requirement has remained the law of the land, notwithstanding the fact that the Founders' fear of undue foreign influence soon proved itself baseless."
So Mr. Dean is apparently unfamiliar with communism?
5 posted on 12/02/2008 10:20:43 AM PST by astyanax (If you need to wear a mask while speaking your mind, it is probably best you remain silent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

U.S. Supreme Court
Weedin v. Chin Bow, 274 U.S. 657 (1927)

Weedin v. Chin Bow

No. 237

Argued March 16, 1927

Decided June 6, 1927

274 U.S. 657

Syllabus

1. Under Rev.Stats. § 1993, which provides:

“All children heretofore born or hereafter born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, whose fathers were or may be at the time of their birth citizens thereof are declared to be citizens of the United States, but the rights of citizenship shall not descend to children whose fathers never resided in the United States,”


6 posted on 12/02/2008 10:21:26 AM PST by hsrazorback1 (Seek truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

John Dean wasn’t (and STILL isn’t!) worthy enough to SPEAK about the LAW!!!


7 posted on 12/02/2008 10:22:06 AM PST by Mr. Jazzy (Happy 233rd Birthday, USMC!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jazzy; All

10 minutes after posting this article
the link to the following case(United States v. Wong Kim ) as stated in the article was down. I just go an email from someone (who was just reading it) that you now have to sign in to view it.

I will go and check this out...if its true..... strange days are here my friend


8 posted on 12/02/2008 10:40:12 AM PST by OL Hickory (hear that sound..its a hammer hitting the nail on its head!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hsrazorback1
whose fathers were or may be at the time of their birth citizens thereof are declared to be citizens of the United States

What's it say for fathers who are declared to be citizens of Kenya?
9 posted on 12/02/2008 11:24:03 AM PST by Beckwith (Typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

Go here - - Cases law is on this site:

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm

Cursor down to 11/29/08


10 posted on 12/02/2008 11:25:48 AM PST by Beckwith (Typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory
Amazing!

This article is dated October 8, 2008.

The Obama natural born citizenship scandal is entering into a new phase and quickly escalating.

John Dean, here, publishes an article involving the very controversy surrounding Obama, but.....ONLY MENTIONS THE ISSUE AS RELATED TO MCCAIN, ROMNEY, AND OTHERS THAT WERE AFFECTED BY THIS ISSUE.

No mention of Obama in this article, on October 8? Why the hell not??

11 posted on 12/02/2008 11:46:26 AM PST by motoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motoman

Never mind - article is dated Oct 8, 2004


12 posted on 12/02/2008 11:47:09 AM PST by motoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: motoman

wow..i started to re-read the article thinking i missed something...thanks for the correction


13 posted on 12/02/2008 11:54:38 AM PST by OL Hickory (hear that sound..its a hammer hitting the nail on its head!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson