A Hindu Man Explains: "Why I Hate Islam"

Wordpress ^ | 30-11-08 | Raj Kumar Bhardwaj

[Believer in Patriotism]

A Hindu Man explains: ‘Why I hate Islam’

What happened in Mumbai isn’t new. Muslims have been slaughtering Hindus for ten centuries. In his own words, this Hindu man reveals what the Western media have ignored.

“When Islam arrived in India, the Hindus welcomed the Muslims with open arms as brothers. In return Islam destroyed the entire Hindu civilisation.

Over ten centuries the dirty Muslim rogues murdered an estimated 100 million people. It has been said by historians and scholars (both eastern and western) that this is the largest genocide the world has ever witnessed. Muslim religious leaders “educated” Muslim men to rape Hindu women as this was a method to destroy the Hindu progency. Soon raping Hindu women was part of what being a Muslim man was about! Temples were razed to the ground and villages were burned. Those who refused to convert to islam were either murdered (the menfolk) or raped (the womenfolk). All the slutty Mughal leaders made it their goal to wipe Hinduism from the map of the earth! They even openly stated it.

I have no sympathy for Muslims. It seems that today Muslims from all corners of the world are facing hardship and problems. You only need to look at the devastation that Islam has wrecked on Hinduism to ascertain why this is happening. What goes around eventually comes back around and this is why Muslims are suffering. I have no sympathy or feeling for them. What angers me is that even today in India the dirty ugly b a s t a r d s are still sucking the blood of Hindus. If Muslims think that what they are experiencing now is bad, they haven’t seen anything yet. The world is just getting started.

Futher to the above, I disagree that the Muslims unified anything or anyone. Islamic armies marched through the world killing men and raping women. That is the sole reason why they conquered all the lands that they did. There is a sharp distinction between invasion and unification. They instituted islam through coercion and violence. Before Islam reached India, the latter was a global power. Indian influence and culture as well as exports of knowedlge (science, maths etc) were felt throughout the world. When the evil, ugly, dirty uneducated Muslims invaded the top half of India, all the power that India commanded was destroyed. The Muslims contributed NOTHING to the Indian culture, intellectual establishment or civilisation. Quite the opposite they stole everything from us. They stole our women, they murdered our menfolk, destroyed temples etc.

Also for your information, I am an Indian who was born and bred in London (England) where Muslim atrocities are taught in state schools as a fact. So it is futile for you to say that I am under the influence of any Zionist organisation. If anybody is a slave here it is you. You are a slave of the evil Islamic religion.

You say your religion is a religion of peace. But your religion teaches Muslims that non-Muslims are infidels and that they should be killed. It also teaches them that women who do not “obey” their husbands must be beaten. Most of the terrorist organisations are Muslim. Muslims are renowned as mass murderers and terrorists. Moreover the highest religious leaders in your religion themselves use religious doctrine to justify killings so please do not say that Islam is a religion of peace.

And you talk crap about Palestine and Kashmir. Indians are doing nothing wrong in Kashmir. Kashmir is, was and always will be part of India. Do you even know what the history is behind Kashmir? When India and Pakistan were becoming independent, the leaders of all the states that border what was to become India and Pakistan were offered a choice of whether to become part of Pakistan or part of India. Kashmir had a Muslim population but a Hindu prince, and he wanted to be part of India. It was your beloved Muslim country Pakistan that actually started this whole dispute by attacking India.

At first the Kashmiri Muslims had no problem with becoming part of India. So please check your sources out! And you are quick to say that Kashmiris are oppressed and that they are being killed, but how conveniently do you leave out all the Hindus that were slaughtered in Kashmir in order to tilt the demographic favour towards the Muslims. There are hardly any Hindus now in Kashmir because they have all been killed by your Islamics. It is ok for Kasmiri Muslims to muder and wound hundreds of innocent Hindus every year in terrorist attacks but the moment that the Indian army tries to defend its citizens and crack down on the terrorists we are accused of “oppression” and human rights violations.

Hindus were under oppression from Muslims for ten centuries. In their own country they were treated as second class citizens. The British gave the Hindus their self-respect back. Under the British, Hindus thrived. They felt that finally they were living in their own country again. So why shouldn’t they have co-operated with the British???

It makes me sick when I hear you people justifying terrorism by saying that you are oppressed. Look at South Americans, Look at Africans look at East Europeans. These people have faced much more hardship than you people have yet I do not see them producing terrorist organisations. And anyway, for the all the “Muslim brotherhood” rhetoric and nonsense that I constantly hear about, why aren’t all the rich, oil owning fat Arabic sheikhs helping their impoverished Muslims out? Clearly they have MUCH MUCH MUCH more than enough capital to ensure decent living standards in Palestine. The problem isn’t oppression. The problem is ISLAM.

To hell with Islam!”

Raj Kumar Bhardwaj

talkchina

The issue isn’t IF we will be attacked again by these Muslim savages, but WHEN.

November 30, 2008

[the invisib1e hand]

from what I understand, hindus can be pretty brutal, too.

[hecht]

check out hindu unity.org

[hecht]

check out hindu unity.org

[2banana]

My only complaint is why radical Hindus attack and destroy Christian churches and villages in Indai?

[ClearBlueSky]

They can be, yes.
BUT- you don’t defeat monsters with ballerinas. Islam is a brutal enemy- if it takes an equally brutal response to destroy it, so be it.

Being ‘understanding’ and tolerant has gotten us to where we are with the death-cult barbarians of Islam.
Let the most brutal of Hindus at them!

[Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus]

Hinduism = not much better than Islam, actually

[the invisib1e hand]

Let the most brutal of Hindus at them!

Ahh, well, the brutal hindus I was referring to are the ones who are terrorizing entire towns and burning churches in the rural provinces.

One of many links: http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=29407.

[MyTwoCopperCoins]

My only complaint is why radical Hindus attack and destroy Christian churches and villages in India?

Because it's convenient to name animistic tribals as “Hindus”.

Here's an inverted situation, in India's north-east. Same turf-war. Only interchanged. Tribals again:

“The NLFT has warned members of the tribal community that they may be attacked if they do not accept its Christian agenda.”

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/758342.stm

[tbw2]

Because Dalits are converting to Christianity in droves, and that makes upper caste Hindus feel as if their social status is threatened. How dare those at the lowest rung seek equality!

[BIGLOOK]

Actually Hindus are a very peaceful people. A recent report on the problems with the Indian police response in Mumbai noted that police officers are not usually armed with handguns, they carry bamboo sticks. Doesn’t mean there isn’t crime in India but it isn’t dealt with force of arms. The Indian cops were way out of their league dealing with the terrorists.

[the invisib1e hand]

bbc will corrode your coins, mate.

[Hodar]

If it comes to a religious war, I think I’d much rather be fighting along side Hindus and those of the Jewish faith, than against any one of them.

Christians, Hindu, Buddhist, Wiccan, Jewish and others seem to have little problem getting along with each other. Islam is the only one that just can’t get along with anyone, including members of their own faith.

[the invisib1e hand]

head-in-the-sand-award nominee #313,223.

[MyTwoCopperCoins]

Wrong!

The church attacks were perpetrated by tribals, who, by definition, lie outside the caste heirarchy.

[MyTwoCopperCoins]

bbc will corrode your coins, mate.

 

National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT)

The National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT) was formed in December 1989 for the purpose of seceding from India in order to create an independent Christian fundamentalist state of Tripura. The group was banned under the Unlawful Activies Prevention Act of 1967.

The headquarters of NLFT is located in the Khagrachari district of Bangladesh, about 40-45 km southeast of Simanapur.

In Tripura a systematic surrender of arms by a faction of NLFT insurgents and NLFT fringe groups is due to the increased security pressure and to infighting within NLFT insurgent ranks. Since 2000 a few hundred militants have surrendered in small groups to the security forces, handing in their weapons. The NLFT leadership engaged in peace talks with Mizoram Chief Zoramthanga in April 2001, however the NLFT has not promised acceptance of any future peace process.

The NLFT has set up a number of camps in Bangladesh's Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT), in the Sylhet, Maulavi Bazar, Habiganj and Comilla regions. NLFT also has ties with Pakistan’s external intelligence agency, the Inter Services Intelligence Agency (ISI).

 

 

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/nlft.htm

 

 

[the invisib1e hand]

solemmegetthistraight: yer gonna use a bbc spin job to prove that other news sources are spinning the hindu violence issue?

You're embarassing yourself.

Come to New York City. I can introduce you to several Catholic priests from India who can clue you in. I think at least one can give an eyewitness testimony. I'm sure all can provide second-person testimony.

Or you can continue to rely on the media to shape your view of reality.

[BIGLOOK]

Hindus rely on Sikhs (from the Pujab) for defense. Sikhs don't have problems with using force, violence, chopping off limbs and head....stuff like that. They're not especially fond of Muslims either.

Would you care to revise your assessment?

[John123]

In return Islam destroyed the entire Hindu civilisation.

This doesn't sound right to me... Isn't India one of the most populated countries in the world? And isn't the largest religion Hinduism?

[MyTwoCopperCoins]

Check the GlobalSecurity link as well.

Ask your Catholic priests about the situation in Nagaland. I'm interested in hearing how they manage to bend that one.

Do get back.