Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newspaper share value fell $64B in '08 [avg -83%; 8 of 14 fell by 90%/more]
Reflections of a Newsosaur ^ | Thursday, January 01, 2009 | Alan Mutter

Posted on 01/01/2009 6:09:48 AM PST by Mike Fieschko

In the worst year in history for publishers, newspaper shares dropped an average of 83.3% in 2008, wiping out $64.5 billion in market value in just 12 months.

Although things were tough for all sorts of businesses in the face of the worst economic slump since the 1930s, the decline among the newspaper shares last year was more than twice as deep as the 38.5% drop suffered by the Standard and Poor’s average of 500 stocks.

The debacle was widespread and thoroughgoing, as detailed below. Here are some highlights from the data:

:: The shares of eight of the 14 publishers tracked in the survey fell by 90% or more. The best-performing companies were the Washington Post Co., New York Times Co., and News Corp., but WaPo, the least battered issue of all, still fell 51.5%.

:: While market capitalization surpassed $1 billion for all but one of the 13 publishers that were publicly traded at the end of 2004, only four publishers today are valued at $1 billion or more. The New York Times Co. is barely clinging to the distinction. A drop of as just a few cents per share would knock NYT out of the increasingly exclusive billion-dollar bracket.

:: The biggest loser of all was Tribune Co., which is worthless as the result of the bankruptcy filed less than 12 months after Sam Zell bought its shares for $8.2 billion to take the company private.

:: Trading for pennies, the shares of GateHouse Media, Journal Register Co. Lee Enterprises and Sun-Times Media Group are essentially worthless. GHSE, JRCO and SUTM all were banished to the Pink Sheets earlier this year when their shares fell below the rule at the New York Stock Exchange that prohibits an issue from closing below $1 per share for 30 days in a row.

:: At least two more publishers may be destined for the Pink Sheets early in 2009. Unless LEE's shares turn around within a matter of days, it is likely to be the fourth newspaper stock booted off the Big Board. After falling below $1 per share in mid-December and failing to recover, McClatchy may not be far behind.

It is fair to surmise that newspaper stocks last year got trounced twice as badly as the broader market , because investors have not seen any plausible strategies from publishers to reverse the accelerating declines in readership, advertising and profitability that have been under way since 2006.

As if that were not bad enough, a number of publishers are staggering under the heavy debt they acquired in recent years to fund acquisitions that might have proven to be wise, if the newspaper industry had been able to replicate the steady growth in sales and profits that they largely had enjoyed in the decades since World War II.

But times changed, newspapers didn't and investors lost faith in the long-term viability of the industry.





TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: bailout; biasmeanslayoffs; trysellingthetruth
Happy New Year.
1 posted on 01/01/2009 6:09:48 AM PST by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abb

ping


2 posted on 01/01/2009 6:10:13 AM PST by Mike Fieschko (et numquam abrogatam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

As someone who has worked at various newspapers the past 20 years, I would have no qualms if 90% of them ceased to exist.

The news business is not dependant on having centralized news gathering groups, most of which distort the news anyway.


3 posted on 01/01/2009 6:20:32 AM PST by Edit35 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

They helped get Obama elected, that is what counted... now they can all die off.


4 posted on 01/01/2009 6:42:30 AM PST by ikka (Brother, you asked for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ikka

It’s not just “technology”, it’s the inherent lack of respectful interactivity and the sheer arrogance and innanity of the papers which caused this crash. In other words technology is synonimous with a healthy dose of dissent interactivity and genuine “truth charity” and respect for readers (instead of that hedonist “Compassion” for corrupt Herodian leisure we get in outrageous bailout mandates with government employees doing the bidding of their fuehrer thus perceiving illegaly taxes the way fascists “followed” evil orders). It’s bad enough people’s litteracy and thinking is crashing down, now they are making printed text utterly useless.


5 posted on 01/01/2009 7:11:15 AM PST by JudgemAll (control freaks, their world & their problem with my gun and my protecting my private party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

“Better Red than Read” is a failed business model.


6 posted on 01/01/2009 7:36:21 AM PST by NonValueAdded (once you get to really know people, there are always better reasons than [race] for despising them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson