Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Historic Week & Month... (Program for Obama’s Eligibility Challenges)
Investigating Obama ^ | 1-9-2009 | Arlen Williams

Posted on 01/09/2009 4:54:23 AM PST by unspun

Investigating Obama, above the browser bar - feel free to refer in blog or forum, email, etc.:

  1. Congress voted yesterday to "certify" the E.C. vote for The Unkown, Unvetted, Usurping President.
  2. It is time today, 1/9, for SCOTUS to confer about what to do with pesky Philip Berg. Do they now deign to grant him standing, this mere Sovereign Citizen? Then, on the 1/16, he gets another meeting of the Supreme How 'Bout That Bogus Potus Committee. Is Tom Waite right and does SCOTUS not like it that BHO has not responded to Souter's prior... invitation?
  3. Attorney, Orly Taitz appreciates that Chief Justice John Roberts has sent Lightfoot v. Bowen (SCOTUS docket page) to committee for 1/23. Wednesday's I.O. article and interview with Taitz here. Also, Orly Taitz' subsequent press release, over there. She exhorts more letters and other petitions from concerned Americans. Her cover letter to Roberts was an interesting move; maybe it helped, at least in citing some of the known references to the meaning of the Article 2 phrase, natural born Citizen.
  4. What has just transpired in other cases? (Obama challenge scorecard)
  5. Well, Broe v. Reed was dismissed yesterday by the WA Supremes, which notified the local media instead of first contacting Broe attorney, Stephen Pidgeon. Huh. And to the SCOTUS Pidgeon flies. He thinks whe WA court, like their Secretary of State may just be saying, "'S'not my job, man." In Broe v. Reed, Pidgeon refers to all of the three major contentions with BHO II: 1. U.K. citizenship at birth via BHO I, 2. No valid proof of natural born Citizenship provided, 3. Apparent Indonesian citizenship as child, revoking any U.S. citizenship.
  6. Schneller v. Cortes (no valid proof of n.b.C.) was taken from Pennsylvania to Justice Souter, yesterday, in the attempt to delay the congressional certification of the Electoral College vote and whaddyaknow, Souter denied.
  7. I.O. still finds it more than "odd" that after Donofrio was given the run-around by the SCOTUS clerks and Wrotnowski's filing was sent away for "anthrax testing," Taitz' Lightfoot filing was "lost" before Christmas. Perhaps more on that, later.
  8. PlainsRadio.com-ops: may get to that later, priorities are priorities.
  9. Does the narrative of August, 1961 in the life of Stanley Ann Dunham fit the possibility of a birth outside the U.S.A.? Sam Sewell of The Steady Drip presents, below
  10. Do you know why it shouldn't matter and that BHO is ineligible, anyway? (more on this, all over Investigating Obama, click the index on the sidebar and/or scroll, or the lazy click here).
  11. How about that new kind of case, boiling up in a conservative state? Must be taking a bit more time.
  12. Those Top-5 "Daddy Says No!" nbC article awards that I.O. has not found the time to do yet... um... see the line-up of natural born Citizen articles, here.
  13. Beyond the essential crisis-solving necessary to preserve the U.S. Constitution, against an usurpation by an ineligible candidate, why does it matter that Barack Obama is kept out of the Presidency? Answer, here.
  14. Read up on Obama researcher, Mark S. McGrew's outrage, below -- and hear him on Internet radio
  15. FoxNews is featuring... Casey Anthony, wow. Fox asks why it is that she did not reveal what she knew and points out that itself, is incriminating. I.O. points out, it sounds like Obama and his Hawaiian birth certificate.
  16. What? BHO Continues to Press His Mega-Money Fundraising?
  17. Keep an eye on that I.O. Sitebar Sidebar:


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; naturalborncitizen; obamatruthfile; orlytaitz; stephenpidgeon
Here, this may help, long about now.
1 posted on 01/09/2009 4:54:25 AM PST by unspun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LucyT; STARWISE; MHGinTN; BP2; BonRad

Here’s a “program” to this week’s Bogus Potus Show.


2 posted on 01/09/2009 4:55:46 AM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan

bookmark


3 posted on 01/09/2009 5:10:11 AM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: unspun

bookmark


4 posted on 01/09/2009 5:48:50 AM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

When I was raising my son, it never occurred to me that I would live to witness the demise of the Constitutional Republic. But I have!


5 posted on 01/09/2009 8:26:30 AM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Attorneys interest in helping can contact Orly Taitz and act as pro hoc vice counsel. http://drorly.blogspot.com/


6 posted on 01/09/2009 9:25:58 AM PST by esquirette (If we do not know our own worldview, we will accept theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun
I found the following information on another blog. The poster claims that Obama's mother used a social security number belonging to someone else.

I don't know what to make of it. I thought I would post it here for discussion sake.

*****

As you remember I reported that the social security number 535-40-8522 that Obama’s mother Stanley Ann Dunham used most of her life showed active many years after she supposedly passed away.

Two days ago I reported that there is a woman in Bothell WA, Phyllis Albriktsen that has been using this social security number all her life. By all accounts she is the real owner of this social security number.

She was born in Washington state on 12.28.42.

She has roots in the community and lived all her life in that community.

Last phone number 425-485-8815.

Please, our patriots from Wa. Visit this woman and her family. See names of all the relatives below. I need to know how did this Stanley Ann Dunham (or who ever in god’s name she is)got this woman’s info. How did their lives cross? Phyllis is the same age as Stanley Ann, they are only one month apart. (Stanley Ann was born in November 1942, if this is even her real birth date).

Please, report this to all the media, all of law enforcement, all of governmental officials, particularly Chicago FBI, Patrick Fitzgerald’s office, all of elected officials, Att. General of the US Muke Mukasey.

I am deeply concerned why nobody in government and law enforcement is acting. This is such a tremendous danger to the National Security of this whole country.

We have no clue who these people are. Their social security numbers are wrong, their birth certificates are sealed and hidden from the citizens of this country. No marriage license for Ann Dunham and BO sr, no burial place, no medical records, no birthing records from any hospital, no coroners reports for the deceased.

If the law enforcement and government of this country does not step up to the plate and doesn’t announce official investigation of this matter immediately, we need to protect ourselves, we need civilian militia, we need our own investigating services, we need new government.

Please see Intellius report

Background Report for Phyllis Albriktsen, 66

LOCATIONS FOR PHYLLIS ALBRIKTSEN:

2 Addresses in SNOHOMISH, WA

1 Address in BOTHELL, WA

RELATIVES OF PHYLLIS ALBRIKTSEN:

Scott Albriktsen

Ron Albriktsen

Roger Albriktsen

Wade Albriktsen

+ 5 More Relatives

INCLUDES 1 PEOPLE SEARCH RECORD FOR

7 posted on 01/09/2009 12:54:28 PM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

Thank you, John.

And now that we all know this, we all need to shoot each other.


8 posted on 01/09/2009 1:09:17 PM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: unspun
Just wondering: A married American missionary couple are working in a foreign country.

1. They have a child while living in the foreign country.

2. Is that child eligible to be President of the United States under the laws of the U.S. Constitution? Thanks.

9 posted on 01/09/2009 3:38:59 PM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: john mirse
Just wondering: A married American missionary couple are working in a foreign country. 1. They have a child while living in the foreign country. 2. Is that child eligible to be President of the United States under the laws of the U.S. Constitution? Thanks.

No, not by the term, natural born Citizen as commonly understood by the framers. Vatel, Tucker, Bingham, and by corroborated inference to his pivotal letter to Washington: Jay.

Link, The Donofrio "Natural Born Citizen" Challenge

10 posted on 01/09/2009 4:02:58 PM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
When I was raising my son, it never occurred to me that I would live to witness the demise of the Constitutional Republic. But I have!

As Stephen Pidgeon can relate (I think also *Slouching to Gomorrah* by Bork may relate), there have been a mounting set of Constitutional mandates ignored with the passing decades.

Meanwhile they dishonestly credit revisionist meaning to it (e.g., the fictitious "penumbra" of the 14th A).

11 posted on 01/09/2009 4:07:32 PM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: john mirse
This is a followup to an earlier message that I,mirse, posted concerning Obama's mother's social security number.

It seems that the original poster may have been mistaken when he claimed that Obama's mother was using someone else's social security number.

Here is the followup message:

"I am trying to solve the mystery of this social security number. I received information from a private investigator that the social security number 535-40-8522 was entered together with the name of Phyllis Albriktsen into the Lexis-Nexus and Choice Point database, that is owned by Cisco. I was told that Cisco was purchased by a Chinese company (I don’t have the name). I called Ms. Phyllis Albriktsen at 425-337-1098, she said that it is not her ss number, she didn’t know who did it.

I need help from people that do tech support for Lexis- Nexus, ChoicePoint and Cisco. I need to track a person, that is entering this information and I need to know why he or she is doing it. If you work for one of these companies and can help tracing people that are entering this information,please call 949-683-5411 or e-mail dr_taitz@yahoo.com, mark “Re trace ss” ”

Leave Phyllis alone, for now!"

12 posted on 01/09/2009 5:36:30 PM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: unspun
ust wondering: A married American missionary couple are working in a foreign country.

1. They have a child while living in the foreign country.

2. Is that child eligible to be President of the United States under the laws of the U.S. Constitution? Thanks.

No, not by the term, natural born Citizen as commonly understood by the framers. Vatel, Tucker, Bingham, and by corroborated inference to his pivotal letter to Washington: Jay.

Link, The Donofrio "Natural Born Citizen" Challenge 10 posted on Fri 09 Jan 2009 07:02:58 PM EST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)

*******

1. A young married American couple live in Seattle, Washington. Washington is right next door to Canada.

2. The wife is 8 months pregnant.

3. The couple decide to spend a few days in Vancouver, Canada---Vancouver touches Washington---because the baby is not due for another month.

4. While in Canada, the American wife suddenly goes into premature labor, and the baby is born in a Vancouver hospital.

5. Question: Is that child of an American couple who was born unexpectedly in Canada eligible to be President of the United States? Thanks.

13 posted on 01/09/2009 6:01:07 PM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

If the SCOTUS were upholding the Constitution, the answer woul dbe no according to the framers’ use of the term natural born citizen. That’s why Donofrio believes McCain was not eligible either, he was born in Panama, in Colon, Panama, not in the Canal Zone.


14 posted on 01/09/2009 7:47:04 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; john mirse
Right. This person is as much of a citizen as anyone else. He just cannot be U.S. President, by John Jay's request to the Constitutional Convention, and their adoption of his suggestion, in Article 2.
15 posted on 01/10/2009 1:42:26 AM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: unspun
Right. This person is as much of a citizen as anyone else. He just cannot be U.S. President, by John Jay's request to the Constitutional Convention, and their adoption of his suggestion, in Article 2. 15 posted on Sat 10 Jan 2009 04:42:26 AM EST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)

********

Obama's credentials to be President of the United States:

1. With all this talk in the Senate about whether or not Illinois Senator appointee Burris has the right credentials to be seated in the Senate, could someone please refresh my memory and explain to me how I am supposed to know that Obama is eligible to be President of the United States?

2. That is, what credentials or documents did Obama present to each state to prove that he met the age and citizenship requirements of the laws of the Constitution of the United States?

3. Also, where can I go on the web to examine Obama's valid, legal documents/credentials that prove that Obama meets the age and citizenship requirements of the Constitution of the United States in order for Obama to be eligible to be President of the United States? Thanks.

16 posted on 01/10/2009 6:48:31 AM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: john mirse
1) You cannot know because no legitimate documentation has been presented

2) None

3) There are none, so you cannot

This lying affirmative action con artist has scammed his way so far with the direct help of the democrat party leadership who do not hold the Constitution in any regard that he now has the SCOTUS and POTUS cowed so that they too will not uphold the basic contract between We The People and the federal government. The whole damned lot of them are now illegitimate since they have abrogated the Constitution so this bastard can become president. This almost black man has ended the Constitutional Republic by default, witht he full complicity of Republicans, the current president and vice-president, and the subpreme Court. Long live the republic in the nevermore.

17 posted on 01/10/2009 8:35:14 AM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I am so tired of Obama hiding every record he has ever had in his life.


18 posted on 01/10/2009 3:11:04 PM PST by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All

An excerpt from the Obama Timeline.

During a November 25 press briefing, Deputy White House Press Secretary Tony Fratto ignores a question about the legitimacy of Obama’s birth certificate. Journalist Lester Kinsolving asks, “The CEO of WorldNetDaily has called on the President-elect to release a birth certificate listing the hospital and names of parents. The White House believes that this would fully satisfy the constitutional requirement, don’t you?” Fratto responds, “I don’t think I have anything to say on that, Lester, and I think we’re going to end it right there.” [550]

Gary Kreep, attorney with the United States Justice Foundation, states that his group will continue to file lawsuits challenging every bill signed by Obama even if he takes office, arguing that he is ineligible to serve because he is not a natural born citizen. Kreep was one of the lawyers involved with the Alan Keyes lawsuit, which argues that “Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void, Petitioners, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal.” [552]

http://www.colony14.net/id41.html


19 posted on 01/11/2009 10:45:27 AM PST by Eye of Unk (How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words! SA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson