Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Are We So Unwilling to Admit That Racism is Dead?
North Star Writers Group ^ | January 29, 2009 | Dan Calabrese

Posted on 01/29/2009 6:10:47 AM PST by Dukes Travels

It was not even 50 years ago that black people were prevented from sitting in certain places, living in certain neighborhoods, having certain jobs and attending certain schools – just because a significant number of white people thought they were undesirable. And our nation’s laws permitted this.

It was not even 150 years ago that white people could own black people as property – just because an entire region of the country regarded them as subhuman. And our nation’s laws permitted this.

Talk of racism can become so trivial at times, we can lose sight of just how evil and inexplicably wrong it was. And I do mean was.

(Excerpt) Read more at northstarwriters.com ...


TOPICS: Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: bho44; blackpresident; delusional; hypocrisy; idiots; obama; racism; racismisnotdead; racistfreepers; whiteracism; whitevictimhood

1 posted on 01/29/2009 6:10:47 AM PST by Dukes Travels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

Why? Because then Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton would be out of a job.


2 posted on 01/29/2009 6:14:16 AM PST by AnnGora (I am unique. Just like everybody else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

Because the Jackson’s, Sharpton’s, Shuttleworths of the world know its a INDUSTRY, and their source of income.

There isn’t a place in this nation where a person of ‘color’ can’t buy a home, join a country club, rent an apartment, buy a car, get their kids into schools.

That ‘era’ ended decades ago.

And there’s the ‘rub’. Even though that era is long gone, the population screeching ‘racism’ still has a 75% illigitimacy rate, a horrific drop out (high school) rate, and is in fact responsible for 70% of gun related violence nationially.

Rather than accept personal responsiblity, its ‘racist’ to even note these FACTS.

Until we do, the problems will continue to grow worse as time passes.

In the meantime, the race baiters will do whatever it takes to protect their ‘industry’.


3 posted on 01/29/2009 6:15:22 AM PST by Badeye (There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

They’ll never let it go.


4 posted on 01/29/2009 6:15:54 AM PST by gridlock (QUESTION AUTHORITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

I hate to tell you this, bub...but it is NOT dead. It never will be. As long as mankind has a capacity to hate, racism will be around. Although you might not see overt racism, just listen to people talk. Heck...just look at some posts here on FR.

I say that not as a criticism, but as a statement of fact.

I will also say that, sadly, it is often justifiable.


5 posted on 01/29/2009 6:17:42 AM PST by hoagy62 (Tidings of comfort and joy are now too expensive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

No, the real answer is that the pain of racism (Jim Crow) is still within living memory. Until it passes out of living memory (the generation that grew up under JC and the generation of “firsts” that followed are gone from this world), racism will be very very real to people. The Jacksons and Sharptons will finally become irrelevant and move on to another scam.


6 posted on 01/29/2009 6:18:43 AM PST by Clock King (Radical Conservatives, arise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

Because it isn’t dead! It is alive and well and foisted upon the white male.


7 posted on 01/29/2009 6:19:01 AM PST by TexGuy (If it has the slimmest of chances of being considered sarcasm ... IT IS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

There may be perfect people somewhere on earth that harbor neither predjudice nor discrimination in their psyches but at least I’m honest enough to admit to myself that I dislike them.


8 posted on 01/29/2009 6:19:17 AM PST by Leg Olam (I have a dream that one day, chickens can cross roads without having their motives questioned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels
because an entire region of the country regarded them as subhuman

Wrong. It is/was because an entire political party of the country regarded them as subhuman.

9 posted on 01/29/2009 6:20:20 AM PST by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

We will never be rid of racist PEOPLE. But all races are equal under the law in America, which was not true 50 years ago. So the argument that we are a racist nation is bogus.


10 posted on 01/29/2009 6:25:35 AM PST by waverna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexGuy
Because it isn’t dead! It is alive and well and foisted upon the white male.

What you said. With male-bashing sexism layered on top.

11 posted on 01/29/2009 6:26:35 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels
I'm not so sure it's dead, else what would all those who call the recent election, "historic," have in mind?

ML/NJ

12 posted on 01/29/2009 6:34:03 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

It’s mostly dead on the right. The left is a whole other matter.


13 posted on 01/29/2009 6:34:55 AM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Clock King

And ‘the pain of it’ will last longer if it is fed with racist rhetoric and allowed to grow like a surly dog behind an insignificant fence. As will resentment grow if cherished in any situation.

And at that point, it becomes the resentment-bearers’ problem.

I refuse to take the blame for it and I refuse to feel any guilt for it. “Pick up your mat” as the Good Lord said.


14 posted on 01/29/2009 6:36:56 AM PST by bboop (obama, little o, not a Real God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

Overt racism is dead as an institution.

Soft racism lives on in the Democratic party.

At the individual level, the stupid will always hate other people because they are different.


15 posted on 01/29/2009 6:41:01 AM PST by Doohickey (The more cynical you become, the better off you'll be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels
Why Are We So Unwilling to Admit That Racism is Dead?

This is why.

Booker T. Washington, who rose from slavery to become the nation's first widely recognized black leader, once warned against what he called "problem profiteers" among our nation's black community.

"There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs and the hardships of the Negro race before the public," observed Washington. "Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs — partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs."

Barack Hussein Obama's election to President has also ended the era of white guilt. However, just like the healing scar of slavery, there will those who profit from picking at the scab.

16 posted on 01/29/2009 6:42:13 AM PST by MosesKnows (Love many, Trust few, and always paddle your own canoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waverna

Oh...I never meant to say that we were a racist NATION. If that’s what you saw, then I humbly apologize.

Yes...we will never be rid of racist PEOPLE. Of that, I am certain.


17 posted on 01/29/2009 6:50:49 AM PST by hoagy62 (Tidings of comfort and joy are now too expensive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

Fact is racism is human nature and will always be around. As a people all we can do is pass laws against institution racism. You can’t change some one hateful heart with a law.


18 posted on 01/29/2009 6:51:35 AM PST by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62
He should have said institionalized racism, then I would have agreed (mostly).
19 posted on 01/29/2009 6:55:09 AM PST by thecabal (Keep The Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels
It was not even 150 years ago that white people could own black people as property

Black people owned slaves too.

20 posted on 01/29/2009 6:58:10 AM PST by krb (Obama is a miserable failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels
Interesting replies.

I am not sure how we will know if racism can ever be declared "dead" as in nonexistent. And I mean nonexistent in terms of seeing another person and not noticing whether they are black or white. I am not sure that is physically possible. From that point, though, the question is whether a candidate for non-racism can then act 100% as if they do not notice a skin color difference.

I notice (only using myself, 'cause that's the only test subject I have) that on some, say 20-25% of occasions, I actually DO NOT notice another person's skin color. And it's sometimes odd....some time will pass and the thought comes up, "gee, I went thru that encounter and didn't really notice or care whether I was talking to a black man/woman". I guess that would mean that in the other instances, I do so notice.

Place: Albuquerque airport, the other day. Some black folks arrived by plane and some of their relatives met them. My Gawd, they made so much frickin noise when they saw each other I thought it was a security alert, and I make zero exaggeration. I mean, there was screaming and yelling and wailing and it was just out of sight but very close and loud. Am I instructed to take no notice of that kind of behavior?

See, I think I am a behaviorist.

I freely admit, I discriminate rigorously against people who exhibit behavior that I find dangerous. (I don't consider the above incident dangerous, I don't really consider it anything other than momentarily noisy) BUT THE TWO SECURITY GUARDS who moved into position evidently thought something sort of similar. I'm very equal opportunity as far as I know. If I'm walking on a sidewalk and there are four or five teenagers dressed "gangily" and acting like a herd of wild dogs, I'll cross the street regardless of their race. OR MY RACE... because I have the absolute right to perceive a threat and seek to avoid it. A person has the absolute right to their own fears, if that's a preferred way of stating it.

If I see a bunch of white teenagers or black teenagers in gangish attire, I don't discriminate. I automatically, reflexively, think they are s**theads who can not benefit me under any conditions.

21 posted on 01/29/2009 7:04:41 AM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (Mr. Bernanke, have you started working on your book about the second GREATER depression?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels
Dan Calabrese is well-meaning but he's making the usual “mainstream” conservative tactical error. He's saying, gosh, look how wicked America was until about 50 years ago, but we're trying to do better now, so everyone should just forget about how wicked we once were. As long as that is the “conservative” response to leftist criticism, then we'll never end the race baiting and the racial demands made against the white population of America.

What's needed is a realistic assessment of the racial history of the United States and the world. Slavery existed for most of world history. Probably 99% of the people who have ever lived have lived under Jim Crow rules of some sort. Blacks were slaves here because their lands in Africa practiced slavery with impunity, and would still be practicing it today had Western intervention not stopped it. Whites have not only not behaved in a more racist manner than other races historically, but probably considerably less.

So guys like Calabrese should stop the whining and apologizing. Yes, slavery as an institution is dead and thankfully so. Yes, the old Jim Crow laws are outmoded relics. But dwelling on them is like Navajos sitting around all day worrying about whether they mistreated the Apaches circa 1672, as if the Apaches would have treated them any differently, and as if the victors in any given situation are inherently evil.

22 posted on 01/29/2009 7:09:24 AM PST by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

Smart man. I wonder if Booker T. Washington was derided for being “too white” back in his day?


23 posted on 01/29/2009 7:11:54 AM PST by thecabal (Keep The Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

Obviously you don’t live around ‘em or have to see first hand the culture that places high values drug-dealing, irresponsible fathers, dangerous aggressiveness toward anyone appearing weaker, and unwillingness to earn their own way.


24 posted on 01/29/2009 8:09:02 AM PST by dusttoyou (HNIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels
America should celebrate the fabulous news that racism has been completely vanquished in our society. It may be the best thing that has happened in America in the past 100 years. Why are we so afraid to say that this is so?
Because Booker T. Washington's legacy has been overwritten by the NAACP of W.E.B du Bois.

Washington's attitude was that “Bitterness and resentment is drinking poison while expecting someone else to die.” We all know the attitude of the NAACP: "You owe us." And that attitude has outlived the death of de jure and de facto discrimination. A black can be president, but you can't expect a black to discipline his children to do their homework because of the legacy of slavery. The legacy of W.E.B. du Bois, more like . . .


25 posted on 01/29/2009 9:33:39 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Change is what journalism is all about. NATURALLY journalists favor "change.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

In almost every prison in the US the races self segregate (even to the point of Northern Mexicans vs. Southern Mexicans). Also, as has been often pointed out, most people attend churches that are largely segregated (note the qualifiers in the last sentence!)

There is something about human nature that tends to make “birds of a feather flock together”.

It’s very much like other liberal totems - they have a notion of how they think people *should* behave which is at odds with how people *actually* behave.


26 posted on 01/29/2009 9:38:46 AM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: puroresu
What's needed is a realistic assessment of the racial history of the United States and the world. Slavery existed for most of world history. Probably 99% of the people who have ever lived have lived under Jim Crow rules of some sort. Blacks were slaves here because their lands in Africa practiced slavery with impunity, and would still be practicing it today had Western intervention not stopped it. Whites have not only not behaved in a more racist manner than other races historically, but probably considerably less.
William Wilberforce

Black Rednecks and White Liberals - Thomas Sowell

Epistle to Philemon

Slavery and the Civil War.


27 posted on 01/29/2009 9:58:59 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Change is what journalism is all about. NATURALLY journalists favor "change.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

Follow the money.


28 posted on 01/29/2009 11:29:03 AM PST by starlifter (Sapor Amo Pullus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

It was not even 150 years ago that white people could own black people as property – just because an entire region of the country regarded them as subhuman. And our nation’s laws permitted this.

I’m sorry but slavery was not regional it was legal all over the United States.


29 posted on 01/29/2009 11:35:50 AM PST by Know et al (Everything I know I read in the newspaper and that's the reason for my ignorance: Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Know et al

It was not even 150 years ago that BLACK PEOPLE could own black people as property. Thousands of blacks owned slaves.


30 posted on 01/29/2009 11:37:36 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Know et al

I’m sorry but slavery was not regional it was legal all over the United States.

I refer to region rather than individual states.


31 posted on 01/29/2009 11:43:08 AM PST by Know et al (Everything I know I read in the newspaper and that's the reason for my ignorance: Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Know et al; Clock King
My attitude to those who try to imply that people in 2009 need to atone for what happened over 150 years ago is "Get stuffed". It's long over. My ancestors were not even in the US then.

Anybody who is bothered by it should see his therapist of choice, because he will get no sympathy from me at this stage.

32 posted on 01/29/2009 11:52:16 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (We used to institutionalize the insane. Now we elect them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

150 years ago, I agree. That’s not the problem. People who keep bringing that up (ie, reparations) are just looking for an excuse to loot the US.

The problem is 20 years ago and back. Jim Crow was real even then. My first “real” brush (and I’m not counting the times I was called the N-word), was housing discrimination. In 1984 as a young kid straight outta college armed with an EE degree, good credit, and NO record, I still couldn’t live where I wanted. I could care less today. That battle is over. But for the even older generation, their scars are far far deeper.


33 posted on 01/29/2009 5:52:59 PM PST by Clock King (Radical Conservatives, arise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels
Why? Because there are so many racist liberals.

It is perfectly o.k. to be a racist, so long as you only hate whites.

34 posted on 01/29/2009 5:53:34 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Crisis - America Held Hostage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krb
White people could be slaves too.
35 posted on 01/29/2009 5:59:27 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Crisis - America Held Hostage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Clock King
In post #6 you had
No, the real answer is that the pain of racism (Jim Crow) is still within living memory. Until it passes out of living memory (the generation that grew up under JC and the generation of “firsts” that followed are gone from this world), racism will be very very real to people.
My father is still within my living memory. That does not mean that he is not dead and buried.

I have a memory of being mugged. That does not mean that I am NOW in the process of being mugged here in my house today.

Right now, in 2009, racism by whites against blacks is not a widespread, or even a particularly significant issue, as far as I can tell. Your milage may vary. That was the point that I was making.

36 posted on 01/29/2009 6:11:45 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (We used to institutionalize the insane. Now we elect them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

Because yellow aint mellow, because the red man can’t get ahead man, black is constantly looking back, and because white can’t ever do enough that’s right (paraphrased from the inauguration of the first illegal alien communist president of the formerly United States, who was white and black and red all over).


37 posted on 01/29/2009 6:17:04 PM PST by Starfleet Command
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson