Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report Says Average American Woman 53 Lbs. Heavier Than Average Fashion Model - Video 2/12/09
Freedom's Lighthouse ^ | February 12, 2009 | BrianinMO

Posted on 02/12/2009 6:24:54 AM PST by Federalist Patriot

The average American woman is 53 lbs. heavier than the typical fashion show "runway" model, according to a new study. This video report shows graphics comparing the size of the average runway model (5'9", 110 lbs), to the average American woman (5'4", 163 lbs). I was surprised the average American woman is 5'4" tall.

I know this is a little off-topic for what we usually post here at Freedom's Lighthouse, but I could not resist posting this report. If you have ever thought those models don't look like virtually anyone you see in real life, now you know why -- they don't!

WARNING: For Valentine's Day men, don't tell your wife or girlfriend that she is 53 pounds heavier than a fashion model! . . . . . . . (Watch Video)

(Excerpt) Read more at freedomslighthouse.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: americanwomen; health; weight

1 posted on 02/12/2009 6:24:54 AM PST by Federalist Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

But did the study adjust for age? I bet most runway models are under 30 or even under 25.


2 posted on 02/12/2009 6:27:56 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (If the feds can't competently handle the DTV transition, why should we trust them with health care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Hillary’s left cankle is bigger than the average fashion model.


3 posted on 02/12/2009 6:28:15 AM PST by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

The models are so thin often their ribcages stick out or their chest bones portrude, their breasts just about disappear they are so tiny, their arms and legs look like a concentration camp survivor’s.

The normal sized women - the average I believe is around dress size 14 - would be considered fat by the fashion model industry.

I say screw ‘em. :)


4 posted on 02/12/2009 6:29:13 AM PST by deannadurbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
My wife watches that “America's Next Top Model” show, or “The Skelator Show” as I call it.

Those women are disgusting. Every one of them could stand to put on at least 30 lbs.

5 posted on 02/12/2009 6:30:20 AM PST by South Hawthorne (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

I always tell my wife she’s twice the women those models are.


6 posted on 02/12/2009 6:30:55 AM PST by DungeonMaster (Proverbs 19:17 He who has pity on the poor lends to the LORD, And He will pay back what he has given)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

How much heavier than male models are average men.Not many beer guts walking the runways for men either.


7 posted on 02/12/2009 6:31:28 AM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot; lainie; PennsylvaniaMom; Extremely Extreme Extremist; Tax-chick; TexasCajun; ...

The ideal weight, based on MEDICAL information, is the simple formula.

Woman’s weight (lbs) = [(Height in inches) X 5] - 200


8 posted on 02/12/2009 6:31:32 AM PST by Perdogg (Only the hypnotized never lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

lol!


9 posted on 02/12/2009 6:33:38 AM PST by Federalist Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle

I confess, I watch that show too.

Last year’s winner was a “plus size” model. She actually had a figure.


10 posted on 02/12/2009 6:34:19 AM PST by SandyInSeattle (Go, Sonics! And take the Seahawks with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

I weigh 243 pounds (6’-0”). However, I am at the gym 5 to 6 times a week.


11 posted on 02/12/2009 6:34:43 AM PST by Perdogg (Only the hypnotized never lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

Exactly. Men lose their hair, get paunches, love handles, etc. but few ever concentrate on that in the media. The attention is always on the women.


12 posted on 02/12/2009 6:36:01 AM PST by deannadurbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

In order to be in playboy, your BMI needs to be about 18.8


13 posted on 02/12/2009 6:36:14 AM PST by Perdogg (Only the hypnotized never lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle

Waif thin runway models are a different category than, say Sports Illustrated swimsuit models who have a little more meat on their bones. These days most men seem to find a curvy J-Lo type body more appealing.


14 posted on 02/12/2009 6:36:17 AM PST by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
I was surprised the average American woman is 5'4" tall.

Illegal immigration might be pulling the average down, since the typical Mexican-born peasant woman seems to come in around 4'8". ;)

15 posted on 02/12/2009 6:36:57 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("One man's 'magic' is another man's engineering. 'Supernatural' is a null word." -- Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
Those women are disgusting. Every one of them could stand to put on at least 30 lbs.

Many of those girls aren't even that pretty. They have certain facial features that are photogenic without drawing too much attention away from the clothes they're wearing but when you see them off the runway, these girls are really plain jane looking.

16 posted on 02/12/2009 6:39:56 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

17 posted on 02/12/2009 6:40:43 AM PST by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

I have been to El Paso, Mexican women average about 5-5 to 5-6 in height.


18 posted on 02/12/2009 6:40:52 AM PST by Perdogg (Only the hypnotized never lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3; null and void

I’d hit it.


19 posted on 02/12/2009 6:41:29 AM PST by Lazamataz (Proudly misinterpreting article headlines since 1999.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

All the Mexicans I have ever met are exactly three inches tall.


20 posted on 02/12/2009 6:42:14 AM PST by Lazamataz (Proudly misinterpreting article headlines since 1999.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
I don’t mind fashion models being thin. If it’s beautiful, why not? What I hate, though, is the terrible walking style of today’s models. It used to be the case that mannequins knew how to walk in an elegant, ladylike style. Today, for some reason, they look like they’re trying to stomp a hole into the ground with every step, like Rumpelstilskin. It’s ridiculous.
21 posted on 02/12/2009 6:43:47 AM PST by cartan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Unbelievable! Taxpayers are paying for that.


22 posted on 02/12/2009 6:46:22 AM PST by Federalist Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
lol!

She usually spews her beer when I tell her that.

23 posted on 02/12/2009 6:50:47 AM PST by DungeonMaster (Proverbs 19:17 He who has pity on the poor lends to the LORD, And He will pay back what he has given)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
I was surprised the average American woman is 5'4" tall.

Yay! I'm taller than average at 5'4-1/2". (I dont weigh anywhere near the 163 referenced here, though.) I've always been the "runt" of my family, as all of my siblings, both male and female are much taller than I am.

24 posted on 02/12/2009 6:57:52 AM PST by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

interesting statistics


25 posted on 02/12/2009 6:59:03 AM PST by MathDoc (If there ever was a time that Obama looked like an amateur, it's right now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
This article is sure to get all the fat chicks stirred up.

hehe

26 posted on 02/12/2009 6:59:37 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Yeah, but how much are they paying for abortions, HIV treatment, etc?


27 posted on 02/12/2009 7:00:53 AM PST by Bushwacker777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

My husband tells me I look like an angel...one of those full figured angels like you see in Renaissance paintings, but an angel nonetheless; )


28 posted on 02/12/2009 7:02:12 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

I have to say one thing in favor of the models. Many women have dlender bones and they are perfectly healthy even if they look skinny. Many northern Russian, Baltic and Scandinavian women look skinny but their muscle,bone,fat ratios are perfectly healthy.

However, many, many American, Mexican and British women are just plain fat — no excuses except lack of movement except at the dinner table.


29 posted on 02/12/2009 7:07:29 AM PST by Bushwacker777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
How much heavier than male models are average men.Not many beer guts walking the runways for men either.

Not much bulimia and anorexia in the male fashion model ranks, either.

30 posted on 02/12/2009 7:07:32 AM PST by Charles Martel ("Endeavor to persevere...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

No question that many runway models are too skinny to be especially attractive, but 5’4” and 163 lbs is just plain fat. Also, while most of us might focus on the thin runway models when we see fashion shows, the pros are looking at the clothes. And the thin models allow the clothes to hang the way the designers want them to be seen. It’s not about how the models look, it’s about how the clothes look.


31 posted on 02/12/2009 7:22:25 AM PST by billthecat (Ack! Ack!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
This article is sure to get all the fat chicks stirred up.

LOL! it wouldn't be your comment that would get the stirred up!

32 posted on 02/12/2009 7:23:26 AM PST by Federalist Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

OMG. That just aint right. That makes me nauseous!


33 posted on 02/12/2009 7:23:44 AM PST by txmissy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cartan

The stomping gait cracks me up. The reason for it, I believe, is to give the clothes movement as the models walk down the runway. We focus on the models, but the designers and the fashion professionals, who count, focus on the close. The runway walks are designed for them, not us.


34 posted on 02/12/2009 7:24:22 AM PST by billthecat (Ack! Ack!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Wow...so I’d have to weight 120 lbs. I’d be a freaking stick. 135 works fine for me.


35 posted on 02/12/2009 7:24:41 AM PST by txmissy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

‘I’d hit it.”

Pinata time?


36 posted on 02/12/2009 7:24:41 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (History does repeat itself. This is Ceasar and the Roman Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: billthecat

Well, looks like I only batted .500 on the word ‘clothes’ in that post.


37 posted on 02/12/2009 7:26:22 AM PST by billthecat (Ack! Ack!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
Come now, do you think I'm the type of guy that would try to stir things up? Naaah!

;^)

38 posted on 02/12/2009 7:38:48 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

I thought average was five foot seven inches? Are we shrinking or has there been a massive immigration of short people? If anything, we just keep getting taller up here!


39 posted on 02/12/2009 7:47:14 AM PST by philled ("I prefer messy democracy to the stability of tyrants." -- Howar Ziad, Iraqi Ambassador to Canada)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

We know.


40 posted on 02/12/2009 8:12:52 AM PST by null and void (We are now in day 23 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3; Perdogg

I am going to ignore the slings and arrows sent the way of us shorter statured women...and overlook the whole weight discussion, to concentrate on what is really important...

In some way, shape or form, the taxpayers of California (and the US) will pay to have the tissue reduction (read tummy tuck) done on OctoMom Jolie there. Anybody ever watch Jon and Kate Plus 8? Kate, a married mom whose husband had a job when she had her sextuplets...but I digress, had a tuck done at the benevolence of a plastic surgeon (whose wife had seen their Lifetime Show and knew Kate needed the work done). At the time (ie, a big Lifetime paycheck ago) Kate couldn’t afford the procedure, and insurance doesn’t cover it...BUT our media darling, Angelinawannabe, doesn’t have insurance (because she doesn’t have a job or employed significant other) so even if a plastic surgeon ‘donated’ his services, no doubt the anesthesia, hospital stay, etc would be covered elsewhere.


41 posted on 02/12/2009 8:13:07 AM PST by PennsylvaniaMom (The Joy of Six :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: txmissy
OMG. That just aint right. That makes me nauseous!

Having my tax dollars support her 12 kids, including the new octuplets, makes me nauseous.

And I don't even pay taxes!

42 posted on 02/12/2009 8:16:46 AM PST by null and void (We are now in day 23 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: txmissy

We’d need photos to properly judge that...


43 posted on 02/12/2009 8:18:31 AM PST by null and void (We are now in day 23 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: billthecat

Ah, ok! Thanks, that makes some sense, at least.


44 posted on 02/12/2009 8:25:31 AM PST by cartan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
Not much bulimia and anorexia in the male fashion model ranks, either.

Double standard?

45 posted on 02/12/2009 8:28:01 AM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Are you proof that muscle outweighs fat? LOL!


46 posted on 02/12/2009 8:29:39 AM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

Yes!


47 posted on 02/12/2009 8:30:24 AM PST by Perdogg (Only the hypnotized never lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: deannadurbin

Don’t you just love when some sloppy, unattrctive male passes judgement on a woman’s looks?...most times when the woman wouldn’t look twice at “the judge.”


48 posted on 02/12/2009 8:32:44 AM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

For this reason, my 12-year-old, who is 5-3 and 95 pounds, frets about her figure. Since she helps on the farm and plays soccer I keep reminding her she is muscular. Sometimes I fear it’s a losing battle. Mom can only say so much while the kids are getting pounded by the distorted images of “beautiful” models.


49 posted on 02/12/2009 10:53:17 AM PST by Cloverfarm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson