Skip to comments.Sorry about that, Dr. Mengele
Posted on 03/12/2009 5:26:05 AM PDT by moneyrunner
Who would be against finding better ways of treating hypothermia or malaria? What monster would prevent us from discovering a cure for gangrene? Who is against better treatment for burns? Given the scarcity of fresh water in many parts of the world, can we find ways of putting seawater to human use? And who knows what useful science can result from the study of twins?
Somehow, at one time and place, certain experiments designed to find the answers to these worthy questions were found to be a crime against humanity. But thanks to the policies of the Obama administration, these outworn shibboleths have been replaced. Today questions of the ethics of these studies must be dismissed as wrongheaded. Science, not politics or ethical standards, must take precedence.
Regarding the destruction of human embryos for the purpose of conducting stem cell research, Obama said this:
our government has forced what I believe is a false choice between sound science and moral values.
Not only must this science go forward, but it is a moral imperative that it proceed.
... As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for each other and work to ease human suffering.
There is, of course, controversy about these experiments. For many, the destruction of embryos, like the destruction of fetuses, is not a moral issue. For these, human life does not begin prior to birth. For still others in this camp, such as Peter Singer, human life is not protected until well after birth and ceases to be protected once certain illnesses occur. In fact, for Singer, there is no ethical differnce between human life and, say, a pig.
But most people acknowledge the ethical issues ....
(Excerpt) Read more at moneyrunner.blogspot.com ...
All true. I mean, who are WE to try to distinguish between science and morals, right?
“We did it for science.” - Karl Brandt at his Nuremberg trial
It looks like zero discovered that it was no longer “above his paygrade” to determine when human life begins.
Or maybe Nancy talked to him about what the Pope said.
our government has forced what I believe is a false choice between sound science and moral values. ---Barack Obama, 2009.
Coincidence? I think not!
As if we needed more proof.
Yes, when the real terms are used it is exactly what mengele did on LIVE children.
I really see no moral difference whatsoever.
A godless mind can excuse the most depraved actions and heartily endorse the worse of evils upon innocent others. History proves it over and over again.
It WILL get worse.
More Terri Schiavos
More excused experiments upon our very own unborn children. (For instance the recent eugenics news about the doctor who can select blonde/blue children for you)
More of our very own children ripped to peices inside their mother's own wombs as they are sacrificed on the alter of selfishness and pride.
More anti-Christian hatred, all while endorsing lies such as creation worship (Al gore) and the evil that is Islam.
More hate crime legislation against those who hold to conservative values (think Canada and the Hague)
Only God knows how bad it will get.
And one day, we like many societies before us, will mourn as we wonder how we ever became captives to such evil.
The answer lies in the lies...
Read Ofama's last line again...
"...As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for each other and work to ease human suffering"
faith?...of what...Molech worship?
"care for each other?...science experiments on our unborn children...that kind of "care"?
"ease human suffering"...like he endorses for the innocent little ones?
The lies of the one who was a liar from the dawn of time, and Ofama is is spokseman, his advocate.
That's how our society will collapse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.