Skip to comments.NATIONAL "GRAND JURY" INDICTS OBAMA FOR FRAUD AND TREASON
Posted on 04/30/2009 7:53:28 AM PDT by classical artist
(United States of America) April 29th 2009 - At 8 P.M, ET American Grand Jury convened and conducted a hearing with regard to CRIMINAL activity, complaints and allegations presented before said Jury.
After reviewing the evidence and voting, the 32 member American Grand Jury handed down the presentment(s) recommending that person(s) known as Barack Obama, aka: Barack Obama, Jr., aka: Barack Hussein Obama, aka: Barry Soetoro; aka: Barry Obama; aka: Barack H. Obama, aka: Barack Obama II, presumed President of the United States, be tried in Criminal Court for charges of fraud (eligibility) and treason.
Said Grand Jury was convened under the power and authority vested with the people as guaranteed under the Constitution of the United States of America, Amendent 5 of the Bill of Rights.
The American Grand Jury was served by people from different States within the Union, said people being citizens as were sworn under Oath as to Eligibility for and Service in behalf of the Grand Jury:
The American Grand Jury used established public evidence and testimony recognized by expert witnesses with a long professional history of forensic experience in handing down the presentment(s).
(Excerpt) Read more at americangrandjury.org ...
Which court/judge seated this Grand Jury? That may help understanding the legal channels they will go up until they reach a court with the proper authority on this (ie, if it was a federally seated grand jury, it may have only a couple of steps for a court hearing, if it where a local court, it would be more steps before an official hearing.)
So what does this mean for Zero? What are the next steps?
Is that the “Don’t Taze Me, Bro” guy?
Oh, good GRIEF.
Wow, that was fast: Mojave and stormer dropped in and gave what I’m starting to believe is their usual worship of the status quo.
Sounds good to me! Let’s roll! What’s next now after the Grand Jury?
No ping, naturally.
Sam Sewell, the “National Spokesperson” for this group of self-appointed “jurors”, is also a “Pastoral Psychotherapist.”
Regularly, in if a Grand Jury true bills an indictment, that bill will be handed over to the District Attorney or judge to establish a court hearing date and/or issue any warrants necessary to get the accused in court. I'm wondering about my question above, what court, district, or judge actually seated this grand jury, it will make a difference in the process and we can also see how favorable they may be to Zero.
I guess the fact that there is no legal standing for the findings of such a 'grand jury' isn't a deterrent to you and others.
If only ...
A Grand Jury can only be seated by a court, that term is describing a legally appointed and recognized officer of the court. If they are using that term, they must have been seated by a court or they are improperly using the term.
It’s the old “common law jury” scam.
Like all those blogs that 'indicted' President Bush for war crimes?
Phil from the RightSide of Life keeps an update on the eligibility issue & he comments on this case http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=5863#more-5863
mnehring -you know more than I do. Thank you for your input.
Right now I wouldn’t dare say I know more, just a lot of questions..
Every conspiracy claim was given credibility, Michael Moore's moonbat movie was promoted by Peter Jennings, etc, and attended by the MSM/DNC war room.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.