Posted on 05/02/2009 8:56:03 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
That would make us liars, just like them!
That is exactly what I said. My daughter said someone came to her door yesterday and just handed her a paper that said the census would be in 2010 and it also said when they came they should have the correct credentials. Nothing that looked like they were GPSing her front door.
Okay, I think we may have our tinfoil hats on a bit too tight. I just found my front door Longitude and Latitude on the internet in about 3 minutes at this website:
http://www.satsig.net/maps/lat-long-finder.htm
This is not secret information anymore. Calm yourselves.
If that's the case, get ready for your new congressman that can't speak English placed there by court order. They have already telegraphed their plans to stack the census.
Should be "How to prevent an ACORN volunteer from casing your joint".
Good info though.
Do my comments seem to indicate that I am willing to accept their bogus count? If so, sorry, not intended that way. We must expose them in any way possible.
But remember, they are the left; they have no standards and are expected to lie. We are held to a higher standard, hopefully by ourselves.
how many houses have a two front doors? do abandoned buildings in cities count?
This is about collecting data in order to have a mailing address for fraudulent absentee ballots.
ACORN is only about fraud.
I don't think we are quite there yet, but that's just me. I'm going to play out a bit more caution on this one.
"It's all fun and games until the first bullet whizzes by..."
Let's make damn sure we are on the "moral high ground" before taking to the streets. Could be awfully lonely out there if we don't.
"The Precision Revolution: GPS and the Future of Aerial Warfare."
Rip and Hasik effectively explain both the technical and nontechnical limitations of both GPS and precision-weapon technology, noting that autonomous GPS-guided weapons have limited utility against mobile and well-concealed targets. We learn why GPS jamming is not as serious a concern since low-power jammers, though easy to build, are easy to counter, and high-power jammers, though expensive to build, are easy to find and destroy. The book examines why precision weapons require precision intelligence, citing examples of how intelligence shortfalls have caused precision munitions to fail to produce desired political effects. Similarly, it discusses the dangers of becoming infatuated with precision technology, noting the "cruise missile diplomacy" of the 1990s, wherein GPS-guided weapons functioned perfectly from a technical perspective but often did not achieve hoped-for results.
The book does not lay out a technical vision for the future of either the GPS or precision weapons, leaving unanswered such questions as how we could make the GPS even more accurate, reliable, robust, and/or ubiquitous, and what military benefits might ensue. Instead, the authors tackle the more difficult question of what precision navigation and engagement mean to the future of aerial warfare. Although written prior to the terrorist attacks of 9/11 (the book includes a postscript composed shortly thereafter), the study's predictions for the challenges the United States would likely face in future conflicts are certainly coming true today in North Korea, Iran, China, Iraq, and Afghanistan. The GPS is one of the reasons that enemies know they cannot defeat the United States in a conventional conflict. Concluding that only nuclear weapons can absolutely guarantee their security, they have therefore increasingly emphasized maskirovka (concealment and deception), mobility, and asymmetric warfare to make targets very hard to find.
obama has made us the enemy and now he needs to know where we live eith pinpoint prescision.
So since this is not the census, we don't have to comply. Right?
http://www.utterli.com/u/utt/u-ODM5MjA4Mg
If you challenge Census Bureau employees about the GPS marking of your private residence, you will be handed a preprinted explanation referring you to Sec. 223, Title 13, U.S. Code, Chapter 7, Subtitle 2 , which explains the penalties for refusing to provide names and statistics of occupants when asked for by a census taker. This only applies when they are taking a census, (which will not be taken until next year), and the penalty for refusing to answer questions for a census is up to a $500 fine.
However, since the actual Census is not due to be taken until 2010, nobody is asking for any information today. They are only GPS marking your front door today, and Sec. 223, Title 13, U.S. Code, Chapter 7, Subtitle 2 provides the Fed NO authority to GPS paint your front door.
My last question is, if they mark it, how do we unmark it? Everybody get your private property sign and place at the entrance of your driveway. It doesn't work but will give you something to argue about. hee!! Many people on my street have the signs up already.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.