Skip to comments.Documented Liar Pelosi Was Briefed On Enhanced Interrogations That 'HAD BEEN EMPLOYED'
Posted on 05/08/2009 11:40:21 AM PDT by Michael Eden
Nancy Pelosi is a demagogue, a liar, and a hypocrite. While that has always been true, it is now a documented fact. Pelosi demonized Bush officials, literally leading the rabid dog pack out for Bush blood. Then it was pointed out that she had been briefed on the waterboardings, as had been documented in a Washington Post article from 2002. And why didn't she raise a complaint then when it would have actually mattered beyond political demagoguery? Finally she was forced to admit that she had in fact received a briefing, but quibbled in a "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is" manner by claiming she was told the enhanced interrogation techniques "could" be performed, not that they "would" be performed:
In a Thursday press briefing, Pelosi flatly denied that she was ever told waterboarding would be used. "My colleague [Porter Goss], the chairman of the committee, has said 'if they say that it's legal you have to know they are going to use them,'" she said. "Well, his experience is that he was a member of the CIA, later went on to head the CIA and maybe his experience is that if they tell you one thing they may mean something else. My experience is that they did not tell us they were using that. Flat out. And any -- any contention to the contrary is simply not true." "Pelosi said her recollection was, 'They told us they had opinions from the [Justice Departments] Office of Legal Counsel that they could, but not that they were' using so-called enhanced techniques, 'and that if and when they were used, they would brief Congress at that time,'" reported Congressional Quarterly. "She said she was never told that such techniques were actually being used." "'As a member of Intelligence, I thought I was being briefed. I realized that was not true when I became ranking member' and got more information, she said," according to CQ Politics.Now the Demagogue of the House is even being revealed to be lying about her qualification regarding her earlier lies. A newly released official report dated September 4, 2002 by the Director of National Intelligence reveals that one Nancy Pelosi was in fact briefed by the CIA, with said briefing including (and see here for the actual memo):
Briefing on EITs including use of EITs on Abu Zubaydah, background on authorities, and a description of the particular EITs that had been employed.No "could" or "would" Nancy. Try "had been employed." She was briefed on what had in fact already occurred. And so were other Democrats, such as Jay Rockefeller. Right from the start. And there is no record whatsoever that they offered any objections or even had any qualms about what was going on.
Even if Pelosi's position were accepted at face value, Pelosi is still being blatantly dishonest. In her own acknowledgment, she was told waterboarding "could" happen. Here's the question: where was her outrage at what she and her party now says was such a barbaric and immoral practice? Where are the letters expressing her moral qualms, such as Jane Harmon sent in the similar matter of destroying CIA tapes of the interrogation sessions? She expressed none. Legally, the failure to object is implied consent. And here she is just a few years later helping to demonize Republicans? And the fact is, we don't have to accept Pelosi's position, because we have the official record that confirms she has been lying about what she knew and when she knew it.
This represents two moralities: the post-9/11 morality, which held that the United States would go to certain lengths to protect itself from terrorist attacks; and the 2008-2009 morality, which holds that Democrats who agreed with the post-9/11 morality can now hypocritically and for sheer partisan political purposes attack Republicans for harboring a view that key Democrats themselves harbored when it served their interests to do so.
And we can add Barack Hussein and Hillary Clinton to the list of liars whose lies keep changing. Obama released the so-called "torture memos" as nothing less than a blatant partisan attempt to criminalize political differences and demonize the opposition party. They got their pound of flesh, I presume. But now that Obama is backing away from the show trial liberals want, it is time for conservatives to counter-attack.
Democrats such as Nancy Pelosi are the worst kind of liars, demagogues, and hypocrites. That is now a documented reality. As Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi is charged with representing her country more than her party, but from the start she has chosen to demagogue rather than perform her duty. She should resign. After launching their vile and despicable attack on Bush officials and Republicans, Democrats need to be held accountable for their deplorable and dishonorable political tactics.
Bring on the Truth Commission!
Well, you’ve got to remember that liberals will always have their “Sandy Bergers” who will waltz in and remove any and incriminating documents.
The “truth” always works better for Democrats when they get to “edit” it.
We all know the answer, but it needs to be pointed out over & over.
I’m glad you point that out, Skeeter.
It’s one thing to report a story and then ignore it, and quite another to just pound on a story every day until every detail is revealed and public outrage is achieved.
The Mark Foley scandal (which was the straw that broke Republicans’ backs in 2006) is a great example. They beat on this story every single day. It turned out that Foley didn’t actually do anything illegal; he waited until the page boys he befriend were legal adults before he revealed to them he was a big pervert. The media were all over that story for weeks leading up to the elections.
The thing was, THE DEMOCRAT WHO REPLACED FOLEY WAS INVOLVED IN AN EVEN WORSE SCANDAL involving not only sex but public corruption. And the media duly covered it (once) and completely forgot about it.
There’s nothing even close to objectivity in the media. They are even more dishonest than Nancy Pelosi - and that’s saying a LOT.
What has been so frustrating is that the GOP has met this impossible situation with an 'oh well' shrug for years.
It’s called “complacency,” which breeds contempt. And you’re right.
Republicans are way too often the “country club” types who think as long as their own ox isn’t being gored, why make a ruckus? They don’t view the government as the solution to their problems, but as a minor annoyance. What they refuse to understand is that government in the wrong hands is dangerous.
Meanwhile, Democrats believe that government is the answer to everything under the sun, and they are passionately involved with government. They go to work in government jobs (because that’s where the “change” is for them); they attend protests (Republicans FIRST protest was basically the tea parties); they try to influence the Supreme Court to make the laws they want (via the ACLU, and how long was it before we even had anything that was FAINTLY like the ACLU?).
And as a result of their government activism, Democrats have tilted the field.
Republicans need to either start getting involved before it’s too late, or watch their country turned into the next failed Marxist/fascist utopia.
The things that you learn. I never knew that Botox also selectively hardens the ear wax to keep someone from hearing an ‘inconvenient truth’!
Actually, I think she had a brow lift which put her eyebrows almost into her hairline and left her with a perpetual “deer in the headlights” look which she seems to think is quite attractive...not!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.