Is Michelle Obama really "a smoking hot babe" as leftists love to tell us?

BrutallyHonest.org ^ | May 12, 2009 | Gagdad Bob

[Scanian]

One more reason why I detest the left is that they are constantly trying to distort reality in the manner so accurately described by George Orwell. This may seem like a trivial example, but the in-your-face insistence that our first lady is some kind of smokin' hot babe is a case in point. All heterosexual men know that this is an outrageous lie. Who are they trying to kid, and why?

Look, we're talking about an average looking woman here. Sarah Palin is not going to lose any sleep over the comparison. But why is this lie being promulgated with such urgency and to such absurd lengths by the liberal media? There must be something more significant going on when someone is in such an insistent state of denial. It reminds me of the liberal love-fest over the Edwards' marriage a couple of years ago. How'd that work out?

Here is a typical tongue bath by closet lesbian columnist Sally Quinn. She says that the first lady's arms -- her arms, fer cryin' out loud -- "are representative of a new kind of woman: young, strong, vigorous, intelligent, accomplished, sexual, powerful, embracing and, most of all, loving."

Hmm. That's quite a devastating indictment. A young, intelligent, and sexy woman is a "new kind of woman"? This is insane. Not only is Quinn seeing something in Michelle that isn't there, but she's not seeing things that have always been there in abundance. Or perhaps she's never strolled through the UCLA campus on a warm September day. Oh, mama!

[SIDENET]

She’s a friggin’ Sasquatch!

[freeplancer]

Yes, if you are into Frankensteinian shadow people.

[mamelukesabre]

She’s butt ugly.

Laura bush is more attractive. And that’s not saying much. That’s why you never heard people going on and on about how gorgeous laura was.

The lefties are pathetic.

[StandUpChuck]

woof,woof!

[ez]

They do it because it convinces the weak-minded. No-one in this society takes the time to learn ANYTHING anymore and simply regurgitates what they read in emails and see on TV.

[lormand]

If you like big linebackers in the NFL, then you will love Michelle Obama.

[KevinB]

They tried the same thing with Hillary Clinton. Didn’t stick.

[vetvetdoug]

She's butt ugly

No kidding. In the South she'd have to tie a pork chop around her neck to get the dogs to play with her.

[MediaMole]

She’s an average middle aged woman with two children. ...and there’s nothing wrong with that.

[exist]

She looks like something they talk about on Coast2CoastAM.

[ataDude]

+1

[y6162]

“She’s a friggin’ Sasquatch!”

She;s a big fat Oprah wannabe. Obamachev is hitting the white women around him. It’s only a matter of time.

[presidio9]

Why does the left need to insist that its current obsession is sexually attractive. Remember when they tried this with Hillary and then Chelsea Clinton. Remeber just a few weeks ago when some of these nutjobs were comparing her to Carla Bruni? I know, I still have trouble believing it myself, but these are the exact same people who compared the Williams Sisters to Anna Kournikova. I would be fair and say that Michelle Obama is not particularly good-looking, but by no means ugly. And she is dedicated to her own particular sense of style, which the liberals seem to like but I guess I don't get.

[Jacquerie]

Despite the comparisons by the Left, she’s no Jackie Kennedy.

[God luvs America]

cnsidering the babes of the left the past decade has been the likes of rosie o’donnell, hillary clinton, randi rodent and jeanine garafolo it is understandable...

[Argus]

She’s a hatchet-faced grinch with a grating voice and no grace whatsoever.

[Retired Greyhound]

I agree with you.

She looks like a normal woman, but certainly not the traffic stopping beauty the MSM would have us believe.

[waxer1]

Oh my Gawd that was funny.

All kidding aside, I really do not see the attraction there. I have to admit that Obama is a very attractive man and those two girls are adorable, but Michelle Ma Belle is not attractive at all.

[Secret Agent Man]

ANswer: No.

Next question.

[beaversmom]

I thought Castro thought Hillary was a hottie.

[Lou Budvis]

Michelle 0bama can’t compare to Sarah Palin, Carrie Prejean, Catherine Hamm, the renegade economist Michelle Muscio, Amanda Carpenter, etc. Even Jill Biden is easily 10x better looking than m.0. So score one for Slow Joe.

[chiefqc]

PUKE!!!!

[KYGrandma]

Ewwwwwwwwww. He isn’t attractive. He’s like Bill Clinton, repulsive.

[lewisglad]

[freedumb2003]

[waxer1]

I think fairly attractive guy. But not her.

[Scanian]

In our house we call ‘em Steve Urkel and Aunt Esther

[classified]

SMOKING HOT!

[beaversmom]

I don’t think BO is attractive at all. Too lanky. Weird head. Jug ears.

[TaraP]

I don’t think she is attractive..She is not butt ugly and she dresses okay....

I am not sure why people slobber all over her....

I guess it’s her arms...They just look like arms to me...
Nothing special...

[Carley]

Only one smoking hot babe on the political scene.

SARAH PALIN

And I’m a girl. She’s so awesome and not only beautiful on the outside but on the inside too.

[Right_in_Virginia]

Every time I see that picture (and others) I understand why MO pays for a full time makeup artist and hairdresser.

[theothercheek]

Read this:

† Your Butt Will Look Good In These Jeans: In the February 9th issue of New York Magazine, designer Isabel Toledo – who outfitted Michelle Obama for the swearing in ceremony - is asked whether the two women had met. They had, just one time, and Toledo tactfully describes her first impression:

“I hugged her and thought ‘Let me see … what size?’ She’s got an amazing torso and long, beautiful arms. She’s like a spider.”

Toledo chose not to be blunt about Mrs. Obama having large hips, thighs and buttocks. But rather than be dishonest or fawning, the designer subtly made her point by comparing Mrs. Obama’s figure to an insect that tends to have skinny arms and a bulbous lower body.

***

And this:

† Updates To Previous Posts (third item, Your Butt Will Look Good In These Jeans): Gushing that “Those toned arms are becoming a trademark,” CNN.com tells readers “how to get Michelle Obama’s toned arms.” It’s true that Michelle Obama’s arms are her best feature – and she knows it, having posed for the March cover of Vogue in a sleeveless silk sheath and for the cover of People magazine in a lacy pink sleeveless dress – but brown-nosing “journalists” would do the First Lady a favor if they instead told her how to get Beyoncé’s butt (no junk in that trunk).

Take that Vogue cover, for instance. Michelle Obama is artfully angled and posed so her huge hips are hidden by the sofa cushions; the skirt of the dress is scrunched to place extra fabric around the hips so the form-fitting cut doesn’t accentuate her thighs; and her arm obscures most of her chest so as not to call attention to how comparatively bottom-heavy her figure is, since her breasts are very, very small. A lot of photographic sleights of hand went into this cover, just like those “before” and “after” photos in ads for miracle weight loss aids:

***

Relevant Links:

http://thestilettoblog.com/2008/11/21/on-the-cutting-edge-your-butt-will-look-good-in-these-jeans.aspx

http://thestilettoblog.com/2009/02/04/the-other-shoe-drops-updates-to-previous-posts.aspx (third item on page)

http://thestilettoblog.com/2009/03/02/the-other-shoe-drops-updates-to-previous-posts.aspx (last item on page)

[Jemian]

This is the same leftist media which touted Hitlary as a “smokin’-hot mama?” ‘Nuff said.

[beaversmom]

Female here too and SP is great inside and out.

[Snickering Hound]

She's a snappy dresser too!

[Lou Budvis]

Everytime I see 0bama in that jacket in that pic (taken at anti-Israel bashfest), two words come to mind: Manchurian Candidate.

[sport]

Not to me.

[RegulatorCountry]

She says that the first lady's arms -- her arms, fer cryin' out loud -- "are representative of a new kind of woman: young, strong, vigorous, intelligent, accomplished, sexual, powerful, embracing and, most of all, loving."

This begs for satire. Her hips, her thighs, her big ol' feet ... lol.

I'll give it a spin:

"Her thighs are representative of a new kind of woman: mature, stout, enveloping, sweaty and, most of all, well grounded."

[kcvl]

Sally Quinn.

Sleeping with the boss has it's advantages though.

[SIDENET]

LOL.

I've never heard of "Shrimpenstein".

[Sarajevo]

She’s a friggin’ Sasquatch!

[x]

She’s an average middle aged woman with two children. ...and there’s nothing wrong with that.

She looks like a normal woman, but certainly not the traffic stopping beauty the MSM would have us believe.

That's about it. She's no great beauty.

And that "young, strong, vigorous, intelligent, accomplished, sexual, powerful, embracing and, most of all, loving" goes too far. How does Sally Quinn know how "sexual" and "loving" Michelle is? And how far can anyone else trust Sally's judgement in things like this.

But she's not monstrous or hideous or a sasquatch either. Too much of what people on both sides are saying is just a knee-jerk reflection of whether her politics and the commenter's politics coincide or not.

[Cementjungle]

I think she’s kind of ugly, with a nasty personality to boot. But, what do I know, I’m not a looney liberal.

[svcw]

I just do not get the fascination with her, especially her arms.
She is over 40 and has over year old arms.
I think she always looks like she has a mouth full of marbles.
And really who dresses her. Normally she looks like a trollop.

[mojitojoe]

It’s because she’s black. We all have eyes. Sheesh she has a gorilla mouth, ugly legs so far apart she could hold 2 watermelons between them. She gets whiter each day, soon she will look like Michael Jackson. She dresses absurdly. Her feet are bigger than most mens. Her hair is nasty. I could go on and on.

[smokingfrog]

Oh, mama!

[lewisglad]