Posted on 05/12/2009 3:31:27 PM PDT by Scanian
One more reason why I detest the left is that they are constantly trying to distort reality in the manner so accurately described by George Orwell. This may seem like a trivial example, but the in-your-face insistence that our first lady is some kind of smokin' hot babe is a case in point. All heterosexual men know that this is an outrageous lie. Who are they trying to kid, and why?
Look, we're talking about an average looking woman here. Sarah Palin is not going to lose any sleep over the comparison. But why is this lie being promulgated with such urgency and to such absurd lengths by the liberal media? There must be something more significant going on when someone is in such an insistent state of denial. It reminds me of the liberal love-fest over the Edwards' marriage a couple of years ago. How'd that work out?
Here is a typical tongue bath by closet lesbian columnist Sally Quinn. She says that the first lady's arms -- her arms, fer cryin' out loud -- "are representative of a new kind of woman: young, strong, vigorous, intelligent, accomplished, sexual, powerful, embracing and, most of all, loving."
Hmm. That's quite a devastating indictment. A young, intelligent, and sexy woman is a "new kind of woman"? This is insane. Not only is Quinn seeing something in Michelle that isn't there, but she's not seeing things that have always been there in abundance. Or perhaps she's never strolled through the UCLA campus on a warm September day. Oh, mama!
(Excerpt) Read more at brutallyhonest.org ...
This guy is too polite. Average?
Normally, her arms looks much bigger.
I don’t watch TV. So I don’t really know what she looks like normally. I only see photos of her on the internet. Some of them look really scary. Some of them look pretty good. So naturally I suspect the good ones have been touched up.
Fred G. Sanford’s sister-in-law Esther. He would often contort his face upon Esther’s entrance and make disparaging remarks to her, comparing her with King Kong and Godzilla and using colorful metaphors to describe her.
Michelle 0 isn’t a pretty woman, and all the little pop heads in the media can’t make it different. She has a mean, bitter look about her.
I think the first lady is not physically unattractive, but I digress. No matter how the MSM paints her, she is no Sarah Palin - on any level.
The inane attempts by the media to make one look more attractive, while bashing the other is a one sided game, and a total farce. And I am so happy when these liberal folk make fools of themselves, and even happier when this idiotic fawning is brought to public attention.
The only thing that will make my knees quiver, is fiscal resonsibility and a tax cut.
What Michelle is really like can be seen in her eyes. They’re hard, ice cold and cruel.
I see these two as a marriage of convenience. Zer0 needed a girl from the neighborhood who knew her way around and had some connections...Michelle thought Zer0 was a go-getter who might make it all the way up to Chicago alderman some day.
LOL!
She literally looks like a man.
I’m not kidding, either!
Her brother is the head b’ball coach at Oregon State.
Put a wig on him and you wouldn’t be able to tell them apart.
The lefty media (democrat propaganda machine) id trying to create another JFK. Someone so lionized, elite and elevated that he is above mere criticism or law.
That why the focus is on Michelle Zira Obama. The left needs another Jackie O. Glamorous and elite, the perfect match to lead the nation. I think the undeserved praise is why she wears the frumpy, bad-taste outfits we’ve seen her in. She thinks she’s Jackie O, but she comes across as a thrift store queen.
Michelle’s praise is a propaganda attempt to make an ill mannered wench into a Lady. Henry Higgins must be spinning in his grave.
No wonder we ended up with a 'Camelot' during the era of NO COMPUTER/INTERNET!
I think it was People that had Sandra Bernhart as the most beautiful woman at one time?
Obama-goggles must be equivalent to about 12 beers....
Image what these same *sses would say if Laura Bush (or any other first lady) was photographed in Vogue like this!
Didn’t I recently see the First Lady on some commercial hawking Star Trek glasses sold by BK?
Yep. The first time I saw her I thought, “lesbian basketball player.” You hit the nail right on the head.
A guy would have to be drunk or crazy to want that.
Her body is like a retired linebacker and her legs are not only ugly, she is extremely bow-legged. Let’s face it, the left doesn’t have a lot to choose from, so Michelle gets to be their smokin’ hot babe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.