To: Mr. Silverback
We all need to get further then BO’s comment about FR. We must be bigger than that. When you are bigger you can let a little false criticism slide off you like water off from a duck;s back. The bigger issue is that BO spoke out courageously against an extremely evil man knowing that it may cause him trouble. He did not remain on the fence when it came to Tiller the baby killer. In today's world that took courage. For that he should be commended and we do not need to feed him to the leftist lions.
Conservatives need to learn to build bridges with others who are not exactly what we think they should be but who are more on our side than the other side. When we constantly shoot our own in the name of being purist we only do ourselves harm. BO deserves to be backed up by us concerning this issue because he was brave and right concerning it.
posted on 06/01/2009 3:49:12 PM PDT
(The end of this age is near but the beginning of the next glorious one is coming!)
O’Reily’s false criticism of FR should be challenged at each instance but not carried into an ongoing (mild expletive deleted) contest.
Please, blind pig, stopped watch and all. BOR is a first order gasbag populist.
posted on 06/01/2009 4:14:22 PM PDT
(Nemo me impune lacessit (Two terms for politicians, one in office, one in jail.))
My objection to O’Reilly has nothing to do with being a purist. It has to do with him lying about this community so he could look “fair & balanced” by balancing out his accurate criticism of the crazies at Kos and HuffPo with false charges of racism aimed at us.
A purist is a person who ditches Dick Cheney over gay marriage. A Freeper who dismisses BO is merely someone with their eyes open. I’m glad he’s on the right side of the Tiller and Megan’s Law issues, but he’s a lying hack.
posted on 06/01/2009 5:42:01 PM PDT
by Mr. Silverback
(We're definitely in the Rise of the Empire era, but is Obama Valorum or Palpatine?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson