Skip to comments.
Devices that warn drivers of traffic cameras draw police ire (DC Area)
The Washington Examiner ^
| July 7, 2009
| Washington Examiner Staff Writer
Posted on 07/07/2009 7:01:26 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
>>It’s designed to circumvent law enforcement — law enforcement that is designed specifically to save lives.
Seems designed to circumvent an encroaching police state.
“Your papers, please”
21
posted on
07/07/2009 7:18:44 AM PDT
by
Betis70
(Keep working serf, Zero's in charge)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
"I think that's the whole point of this program," she told The Examiner. "It's designed to circumvent law enforcement -- law enforcement that is designed specifically to save lives."Seems to me that anybody with enought wits about them to utilize such technology successfully is sufficiently sober to safely operate a motor vehicle. That leaves the threat to "revenue enhancement" as the chief reason to oppose this application.
22
posted on
07/07/2009 7:24:26 AM PDT
by
Tallguy
("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Photo radar tickets generated nearly $1 billion in revenues for D.C. during fiscal years 2005 to 2008.
No more needs to be said.
23
posted on
07/07/2009 7:35:23 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Traffic cameras should be made unprofitable by the freedom-loving residents of any particular area.
24
posted on
07/07/2009 7:41:51 AM PDT
by
mysterio
To: Tallguy
That was my first thought, I’ve seen those drunks on Cops and they can’t even recite the alphabet.
25
posted on
07/07/2009 7:42:45 AM PDT
by
tiki
(True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
To: Rebelbase
Excellent point. If drivers are warned about where these cameras are located, then they will drive more safely in those areas, right? They will be careful about the traffic lights, and be careful about their speed. These warnings actually help law enforcement.
So why would they complain that someone is publicizing where these cameras are located? If it’s all about safety, there should be no complaints that drivers are driving more safely.
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
But, but I thought it was supposed to slow down drivers!
27
posted on
07/07/2009 7:46:01 AM PDT
by
bgill
(The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
“...law enforcement that is designed specifically to save lives.”.
What an utterly dumb statement!
No...law enforcement is designed to ENFORCE LAWS!
...that’s whay it’s called LAW ENFORCEMENT!
LIFE PRESERVERS are designed to save lives.
28
posted on
07/07/2009 7:49:12 AM PDT
by
woollyone
(I believe God created me- you believe you're related to monkeys. Of course I laughed at you!)
To: Betis70
You got it, a bunch of damn facists!
“Lanier said efforts to outlaw the software would be too difficult”
Screw you!
29
posted on
07/07/2009 7:49:19 AM PDT
by
east1234
(It's the borders stupid! My new environmentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
I thought the whole idea was the iconic “raise awareness” mantra of the post-war generation. Looks like the public is becoming quite aware, to me.
30
posted on
07/07/2009 8:07:37 AM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
“It’s designed to circumvent law enforcement — law enforcement that is designed specifically to save lives.”
CORRECTION: “Law enforcement is designed to increase revenue through the issuing of citations and tickets.”
31
posted on
07/07/2009 8:08:49 AM PDT
by
Chewbacca
(Elect General Petraeus for President 2012)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Here's the dumb monkey who is making herself the joke of the day.
32
posted on
07/07/2009 8:19:05 AM PDT
by
Niteranger68
(Have you punished an 0bama supporter today?)
To: Niteranger68
She looks like Alice Tinker, for anybody's who's familiar with the "Vicar of Dibley."
To: Niteranger68
Is she an AA plant (affirmative action, female) or a qualified leader?
34
posted on
07/07/2009 9:06:09 AM PDT
by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
To: JimRed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson