Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Niece of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Says He Was a Republican - Video
Freedom's Lighthouse ^ | July 12, 2009 | BrianinMO

Posted on 07/12/2009 6:49:15 PM PDT by Federalist Patriot

Here is video of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s niece, Dr. Alveda C. King, who claims her uncle was a Republican, along with her father and grandfather. She says the issue of abortion - the rights of the "preborn" - is the issue that demands focus today in upholding the rights of all people. She does not say she believes her uncle would be a Republican today, but the implication is certainly there. The video is put out by the National Black Republican Association (NBRA).

It sheds some light on the story we posted earlier about the controversy created by a billboard in Houston, Texas claiming Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican. . . . (Watch Video)

(Excerpt) Read more at freedomslighthouse.com ...


TOPICS: History; Politics
KEYWORDS: martinlutherking; republican

1 posted on 07/12/2009 6:49:15 PM PDT by Federalist Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

The old Republican Party was in some ways to the left of the old Democrat Party. It was Nixon who established the EPA and also price controls. Many of the most liberal members of the Supreme Court in the last 50 years were appointed by Eisenhower, Nixon and Ford.

The top income tax rate under Eisenhower was 92 percent.

It’s safe to say that the Republicans were not really conservative until Reagan got in. Goldwater was conservative but obviously was never elected.


2 posted on 07/12/2009 6:54:04 PM PDT by steven33442
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Fascinating.

parsy, who never knew this


3 posted on 07/12/2009 6:56:27 PM PDT by parsifal ("Knock and ye shall receive!" (The Bible, somewhere.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
I always believed King to be a Republican, did not realize there was any recent controversy.

Ms. Rice, chairman of the National Black Republican Association wrote: "The Democrat Party has been, the party of the four S's: slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism

Entitlements bought the Democrats the Black Vote, bought them a President as well.

Clip

"....the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King that was organized by A. Phillip Randolph, who was a black Republican. President Kennedy, through his brother Atty. Gen. Robert Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI on suspicion of being a Communist in order to undermine Dr. King."

"In March of 1968, while referring to Dr. King's leaving Memphis, Tenn., after riots broke out where a teenager was killed, Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd (W.Va.), a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, called Dr. King a "trouble-maker" who starts trouble, but runs like a coward after trouble is ignited. A few weeks later, Dr. King returned to Memphis and was assassinated on April 4, 1968."

Why Martin Luther King Was Republican by Frances Rice 08/16/2006

4 posted on 07/12/2009 7:02:16 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Most blacks in the south were republicans before 1965 and most rebel whites (and the KKK) were democrats...


5 posted on 07/12/2009 7:10:40 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

One of the most factually dubious articles written by a credible individual. It’s been debunked more times on FR than I care to imagine.


6 posted on 07/12/2009 7:13:54 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

It is a fact of history that the Republican Party was founded specifically to fight the expansion of slavery.
Until FDR’s time, practically all blacks who could vote were Republicans. Denial of the franchise was what created the true base of the Democrat Party for the first two thirds of the twentieth century, the “solid south.”


7 posted on 07/12/2009 7:14:14 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy (Victory in Iraq: Worst defeat for activist media since Goebbels shot himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Really..I guess I just chalked it up to logic on who did what in political history. Probably not taught in government schools in this context. I always did wonder about Bryd.
8 posted on 07/12/2009 7:20:19 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

The part about A. Phillip Randolph being a Republican was a jaw-dropper, especially given that Randolph was a major-league Socialist and was (along with his wife) Congressional candidates from Manhattan in the 1910s on the Socialist Party ticket. We don’t even know if MLK, Jr. was registered as a Republican at any given time. His father was one until early 1960, but they switched to supporting JFK and never looked back. It is correct most Southern Blacks were Republicans until the 1960s, but most were barred from voting. Had they not been from the imposition of Jim Crow, you’d have had Black GOP officeholders well up until that period from Southern states. Black Republicanism in the North began to rapidly decline under FDR until it was moribund by 1960 (partly because most Blacks lived in cities dominated by Democrat Urban Machines — you had to vote Dem if you wanted to “get along”, say, “pay to play.”).

If MLK, Jr. was Republican, it would’ve been for a brief period in the 1950s, but he was a big believer in big government/federal intervention over local government (which was understandable, given local governments were dominated by racist White Dems), but that ultimately inflicted enormous damage to the Black community. But celebrating him “as a Republican” would be like celebrating Arlen Specter or Jim Jeffords or Lincoln Chafee as Republicans, they were until they switched parties because they were more supportive of Socialist measures.


9 posted on 07/12/2009 7:29:04 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson