Skip to comments.CARTOON: Sonia Sotomayor's Compelling Life Story
Posted on 07/14/2009 7:08:59 AM PDT by NetRight Nation
Just fired off this to Isakson and Chambliss. Suggest you let YOUR guys hear from YOU ASAP!!!!
A vote AGAINST Sonia Sotomayor will be a vote FOR principle.
Regardless of her testimony and responses, she is a dangerous leftist. And the argument by the increasingly silly and irrelevant Lindsey Graham that she is no worse than Souter is akin to a doctor telling you that your lung cancer is cured but you have leukemia.
Should you be tempted to vote FOR her to curry favor with Georgias large Hispanic population, you will be making a HUGE error in judgment. Thousands of them are non-citizens, here in violation of immigration laws and, in light of the recent idiotic Justice Department ruling that Georgia may NOT require voters to show ID, ACORN (or whatever they are calling themselves today) will drag them to the polls on election day anyway. And if you think they will vote for you because you supported Sotomayor, you had better think again: ACORN WILL INSTRUCT THEM VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRAT OR THEY WONT GET THE PROMISED 20 BUCKS, PACK OF SMOKES OR WHATEVER.
VOTE NO ON SOTOMAYOR!
Dick & Sharon Bachert
Good points Dick,
here is my letter faxed to all D senators and most R’s:
SOTOMEYER Vote NO on confirmation
Jury Oath “Do you swear or affirm that you will try the matter in dispute and give a true verdict according to the evidence?” _N.J.S.A. 2B:23-6 Oath of Jurors When the jurors take this oath, they become the judge of all questions of fact and are duty bound to act fairly and impartially in considering the evidence presented._
Sotomeyer in a 1994 speech:
Justice O’Connor has often been cited as saying that a wise old man and a wise old woman reach the same conclusion in dueling cases I am not so sure that I agree with the statement .. Second, I would hope that a wise woman with the richness of her experience would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion.
That’s virtually identical to the comments from 2001 that have generated days and days of controversy. (She has said similar quotes 5-7 times.)
Sonia Sotomeyer has told you with her own words that she is not qualified to be on the jury much less the US Supreme Court. She has said (and proved with her past rulings) that she will not even attempt to be impartial with the law ruling her decisions but also that she does not use the Constitution as her main guide.
Whether or not she will only use the Constitution as her guide is the 1st question that must be answered and if that answer is no then you CAN NOT vote for her confirmation.
Mr & Mrs Bat lady
PS I watched a little of what she said, so sicky-sweet oh I only go by the law and the Constitution..... WHAT A LIAR!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.