Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conscience or Career?
Burkhart's Blog ^ | 07.26.09 | Alan Burkhart

Posted on 07/26/2009 8:08:01 PM PDT by neverhome

Conscience or Career?
By Alan Burkhart

More and more often we encounter news of an employee forced to choose between his or her job and performing an act which that person finds morally reprehensible. This occurs most frequently in the medical and pharmaceutical professions.

Consider the case of Catherina Cenzon-DeCarlo, a nurse at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City. According to a recent article in the New York Post:

A Brooklyn nurse [Cenzon-DeCarlo] claims she was forced to choose between her religious convictions and her job when Mount Sinai Hospital ordered her to assist in a late-term abortion against her will.

"It felt like a horror film unfolding," said Catherina Cenzon-DeCarlo, 35, who claims she has had gruesome nightmares and hasn't been able to sleep since the May 24 incident...

(Excerpt) Read more at alanburkhart.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Politics; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: abortion; catholic; conscience; hospital
Can't help but feel bad for this lady, but your job is your job. She should find a facility that doesn't do abortions.
1 posted on 07/26/2009 8:08:01 PM PDT by neverhome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverhome

Most civilian jobs don’t require one to kill an innocent person in order to remain employed.


2 posted on 07/26/2009 8:17:49 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverhome

When it is wrong, you find a new job, then you let the world know what is happening and then you leave. The point is to be okay and allow the stink to remain on your boss.


3 posted on 07/26/2009 8:25:39 PM PDT by Porterville ( I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skr

“Most civilian jobs don’t require one to kill an innocent person in order to remain employed.”

I completely agree. But that does not negate the fact that she was knowingly working at an establishment that performed abortions. This was bound to happen sooner or later.

If the hospital was correct about the patient’s condition (and there is room for debate on this, btw), then the procedure may well have been necessary to save the mother’s life. If not, then the hospital has the blood of yet another innocent life on its collective hands.

Nevertheless, as much as I hate abortion I don’t think she’s justified in her complaint. She’s an employee, and her personal feelings should not be allowed to interfere with her work. The hospital should be able to depend upon its employees to do whatever is asked of them as long as it’s within the letter of the law.


4 posted on 07/26/2009 8:35:16 PM PDT by neverhome (If Michael Jackson eats a fruitcake... izzit cannilbalism???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Porterville

“When it is wrong, you find a new job, then you let the world know what is happening and then you leave. The point is to be okay and allow the stink to remain on your boss.”

Exactly!


5 posted on 07/26/2009 8:37:12 PM PDT by neverhome (If Michael Jackson eats a fruitcake... izzit cannilbalism???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverhome; skr; Porterville
The blogger apparently kinda conveniently forgot a couple items from the source article:

"During her job interview, an administrator asked Cenzon-DeCarlo whether she'd be willing to participate in abortions. She flatly said no. The nurse said she put her beliefs in writing. The suit also seeks to force Mount Sinai to give up federal funding it receives, because it failed to uphold a federal rule protecting employees who have moral objections to controversial procedures."

http://www.nypost.com/seven/07262009/news/regionalnews/

nurse_forced_to_help_abort_181426.htm

6 posted on 07/27/2009 3:44:34 AM PDT by Jacquerie (We live in a de facto judicial tyranny - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Ping.


7 posted on 07/27/2009 4:07:46 AM PDT by Jacquerie (We live in a de facto judicial tyranny - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Then the employers knew they were in the wrong.


8 posted on 07/27/2009 12:57:35 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Jacquerie...

They asked her if she was willing. The article does not say that they told her she wouldn’t have to. Big difference there that you apparently kinda conveniently didn’t notice.


9 posted on 07/27/2009 9:11:55 PM PDT by neverhome (If Michael Jackson eats a fruitcake... izzit cannilbalism???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverhome

Then why did they ask?

Also: “. . . Mount Sinai . . . failed to uphold a federal rule protecting employees who have moral objections to controversial procedures.”

Can you read?


10 posted on 07/28/2009 2:37:00 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Don't trip over those penumbras formed by emanations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson