Skip to comments.
Newt Gingrich Affirms Sarah Palin's Concern About ObamaCare's Potential "Death Panel" - Video 8/9/09
Freedom's Lighthouse ^
| August 9, 2009
| BrianinMO
Posted on 08/09/2009 10:35:07 AM PDT by Federalist Patriot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: fso301
This is the first one I could find:
link
21
posted on
08/09/2009 12:04:39 PM PDT
by
ScaniaBoy
(Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
To: ScaniaBoy
22
posted on
08/09/2009 12:25:38 PM PDT
by
fso301
To: ScaniaBoy
23
posted on
08/09/2009 12:25:52 PM PDT
by
fso301
To: Federalist Patriot
The tactic is to try and get other republicans to denounce or distance themselves from Palin. Yesterday someone on FOX tried to bait Huckabee into distancing himself from Palin. Last week Pawlenty was baited, but didn’t take the bait. This is so that the dems as well as David Frum can keep saying that Palin is divisive. I’m betting that the dems and Frum (same thing) are pulling their hair out, because the only people they can get to directly attack Palin are Romney people, and they are getting pretty stale.
24
posted on
08/09/2009 12:29:57 PM PDT
by
euram
To: RRTJSP...........
We need an under 15/over40 group to vs. AARP (nonprofit of course)
To: upsdriver
Given he is best friends with Rahm Emanuel and speaks with him daily on a conference call with Carville, he had absolutely no credibility.
To: Carley
And you are against him being supportive of Sarah Palin... why??
To: Arizona Carolyn
A man who does a global warming commercial with pelosi, sings Hillary’s praises is not my idea of a leader.
He likes bandwagons, something Sarah Palin is not.
28
posted on
08/09/2009 12:56:19 PM PDT
by
Carley
(OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
To: bigbob
Thanks, Newt, for supporting Sarah Palins sentiments.
It's nothing new and will become even more common. See my tagline. :-)
29
posted on
08/09/2009 12:56:57 PM PDT
by
GLDNGUN
(PALIN/GINGRICH 2012 since 7/04/08)
To: dools007
HmmmI wonder of old Newt is beginning to understand that Sarah Palin will be a conservative force to be reckoned with come 2012. He has not said positive things about her in the past.
Uh, Newt has always been very supportive of Sarah, so I don't know where you are getting that. They both know how important using our natural resources is to revitalizing the country. I have heard him say many, many good things about Palin. I have not heard him say anything negative. They are on the same side.
30
posted on
08/09/2009 1:01:07 PM PDT
by
GLDNGUN
(PALIN/GINGRICH 2012 since 7/04/09)
To: Carley
>>>>> First newt jumps on pelosis bandwagon and does a global warming commercial, and now hes jumping on Sarahs bandwagon. <<<<<
Words cannot express how monumentally idiotic your statement is.
31
posted on
08/09/2009 1:36:59 PM PDT
by
angkor
(The U.S. Congress is at war with America.)
To: Carley
That does not mean we should criticize him for supporting something Palin said, especially when the worst of the worst pundits is trying to get him to do just that.
To: angkor
There can be a difference between giving Newt his props for being one of the Republicans’ brightest, most articulate and sometimes most forceful defender and promoter of ideas—e.g., applause and appreciation all around for Newt today—and thinking therefore that the baggage of his career and personal choices must therefore be sufficiently small to back him as a presidential candidate.
To: RRTJSP...........
“Stephanopoulus is a liar. READ THE DARN BILL.”
The new talking points at the town halls is that there is no bill yet, therefore they cannot comment on it (although they were all willing to vote on the nonexistent bill). They truly do think we’re idiots.
Anyway, thanks Newt - you probably won’t be invited back after making a fool of Stephi. That look of shock was priceless. You can almost see the blood leaving his face.
34
posted on
08/09/2009 3:29:54 PM PDT
by
Heart of Georgia
(BHO Administration = America-destroying thugs)
To: GLDNGUN; dools007
>>>> Uh, Newt has always been very supportive of Sarah, so I don’t know where you are getting that. <<<<<
This is just one of the many many whackadoodle anti-Newt fictions that are propagated by the alleged “conservatives” on FR.
35
posted on
08/09/2009 3:47:10 PM PDT
by
angkor
(The U.S. Congress is at war with America.)
To: angkor
This is just one of the many many whackadoodle anti-Newt fictions that are propagated by the alleged conservatives on FR.
I recall Newt dressing down a reporter from PMSNBC at the GOP convention last year on their treatment (and the press in general) of Sarah Palin, and he hasn't let up since.
A few weeks ago he was asked if he was running for President in 2012 if Palin should be considered for VP. His response was something like "of course, but why assume that she would be on the bottom of the ticket?". It was a great response.
I haven't really laid out my reasons here on FR as to why it will be a Palin/Gingrich ticket in 2012, but I will in detail at some point. In a nutshell, voters will be looking for someone from outside of Washington (Palin) who has a record of government reform (Palin, Gingrich), promise to reduce the size and influence of government (Palin, Gingrich), and will have a plan to create REAL, private-sector jobs, reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and use our own natural resources (PALIN, GINGRICH). Drudge just posted a story about the price of oil crippling any economic recovery. This is why we are stuck and will only get "un-stuck" when we get serious about DOMESTIC energy production. As it now, every time we start to crawl out from the recession, we will get hammered with higher energy costs, which will knock us back down. That will result in lower energy prices, and then when we start to recover again - BAM - we'll get knocked down again. This vicious cycle can only be defeated by using AMERICAN oil, gas, coal, and nuclear energy. Then we won't be at the mercy of OPEC and oil speculators!
Palin and Gingrich would be the perfect team, as they have both delivered on promises of government reform. Palin especially will deliver the older, white voters that sat out last time around, and many others who don't normally vote but fear the loss of freedoms and liberties that they have come to take for granted - basically the same people packing the town hall meetings now.
36
posted on
08/09/2009 4:30:37 PM PDT
by
GLDNGUN
(PALIN/GINGRICH 2012 since 7/04/09)
To: angkor
Newt=Too much baggage. Marital infidelity was Newt's downfall. He will never be president for that reason. Sorry but that's a fact.
37
posted on
08/09/2009 4:40:03 PM PDT
by
McGruff
(Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency - Obama)
To: McGruff
>>>>> Marital infidelity was Newt’s downfall. He will never be president for that reason. Sorry but that’s a fact. <<<<
Most of us would agree that you have an opinion.
38
posted on
08/09/2009 5:41:22 PM PDT
by
angkor
(The U.S. Congress is at war with America.)
To: GLDNGUN
>>>>> I haven’t really laid out my reasons here on FR as to why it will be a Palin/Gingrich ticket in 2012, but I will in detail at some point. <<<<<
If Newt has the humility to accept the VP spot I agree it would be a good ticket.
39
posted on
08/09/2009 5:47:10 PM PDT
by
angkor
(The U.S. Congress is at war with America.)
To: GLDNGUN
>>>> This vicious cycle can only be defeated by using AMERICAN oil, gas, coal, and nuclear energy. Then we won’t be at the mercy of OPEC and oil speculators! <<<<
There’s also the simple supply and demand issue which is impacted by China and India industrialization and ... more cars in those countries.
China is has been buying massive oilfield rights in Iran for the last 10 years. But it also has several multi-reactor nuke sites and lots of coal-fired electric plants being built and coming on line.
The new Indian Tata car is not electric or alcohol based. It runs on gasoline.
By the way France is also building more new nuke plants.
Obama stopped Yucca Mountain research. There is no new offshore drilling. ANWR is dead for the moment. Coal plants are out.
All “green” energy replacements are absolutely ridiculous from a capacity perspective. Preposterous that any of them (even ALL of them together) could provide even 1 percent of our needs.
This is not a tenable or sustainable situation for America.
40
posted on
08/09/2009 5:58:17 PM PDT
by
angkor
(The U.S. Congress is at war with America.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson