Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kids and Politics: Where to draw the line
Addicted to LAW.com ^ | August 21st, 2009 | Autumn Orton

Posted on 08/22/2009 9:28:38 AM PDT by Addicted To LAW

Last fall I took my daughter to school one morning to find one of her 1st grade classmates wearing an Obama hat. For some reason I felt angry and annoyed that a parent sent his child to school advertising for a political candidate. What’s the big deal you ask? It took me a while to figure out why I responded to this child’s hat in this way.

(Excerpt) Read more at addictedtolaw.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 0; barbara; boxer; healthcare; ibtvk; ibtz; parenthood; pimpmyblog; townhall; troll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: MeekOneGOP

Well, back in my younger blog pimping days, things weren’t so easy!


21 posted on 08/24/2009 6:11:17 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Addicted To LAW
You jumped the shark Newbie.
See ya.

Zot!

22 posted on 08/24/2009 6:14:37 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

IBTZ


23 posted on 08/24/2009 6:17:15 AM PDT by freedomlover (Make sure you're in love - before you move in the heavy stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: freedomlover; metmom

IBTVK (In Before The Viking Kitties)


24 posted on 08/24/2009 6:18:37 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Damn the trolls (even those within our ranks). Full speed ahead. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Addicted To LAW; wagglebee
Parents should be able to teach their children as they see fit. In today’s world, that is not the case. The public school system and mass media have taken over that job. The courts are working to provide children with indepence from the Parents when it comes to parental guideance. So for those who do not wish to think for themselves, what will they feed their children about Obama instead of teaching them about politics and what President Obama is doing.

Just who do you propose teach someone's children, if not the parents?

Whose responsibility does it then become?

That's the start of a slippery slope. Before you know it, *someone* is going to have to be deciding and approving what parents can teach their child about anything.

Wrong.

Passing on to your own children your own values is not abuse of parental authority, regardless of whether some stranger agrees with it or not. Thought control and intruding into parental rights is a liberal position.

25 posted on 08/24/2009 6:19:46 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Addicted To LAW
Nice argument....

I agree........

26 posted on 08/24/2009 6:25:59 AM PDT by Osage Orange (A community organizer cannot bitch when communities organize..... - Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Addicted To LAW
...we try to encourage readers to post comments on our main site. In order to properly manage replies.

This forum isn't here to support YOUR blog, rather it is for members of THIS forum to discuss among OURSELVES whatever content is posted HERE, and when you post here, you don't MANAGE the replies.

When you post your content here and don't otherwise participate (as it was with your first two posts) it appears, y'know, that you're just pimpin' your blog.

Posting content here from one's own blog seems to be OK if done in a not so blatant way. We have more than a few FReepers who do that, but if you do it just for the sake of baiting hits for the money, you'll likely become ground meat.


27 posted on 08/24/2009 6:31:57 AM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (He must fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mountainbunny; Addicted To LAW
...these adults were abusing their parental influence.

It takes a village indeed. No, sorry. Influence over one's own kids is a sort of PROPERTY of the parents, be it religious, political, or otherwise. Others from outside that family may not like it but the parents OWN that prerogative and NOBODY has the right to take it away just (and perhaps especially) because the kids happen to be attending a government school.

I remember in 5th. grade doing a lot of rooting for Nixon (and I think even then I understood a bit of the cynical tone, that it had a lot to do with NOT letting Humphrey in). I learned early, vote for a Democrat and be damned, and in 51 years I haven't strayed from that good advice.

28 posted on 08/24/2009 7:07:07 AM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (He must fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Addicted To LAW
I hate it when you have a paper cut on your finger and you forget and squeeze a lemon or lime into something.

Of course, if that something happens to be an alcoholic beverage, then the sting might not last as long...or be as noticeable.

You know what I mean?

29 posted on 08/24/2009 9:02:56 AM PDT by Allegra ( Socks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Addicted To LAW; Old Sarge

A young woman teacher explains to her class of children that she is a Democrat. She asks her class if they are Democrats too.

Not really knowing what Democrats are but wanting to be like their teacher, their hands explode into the air like fleshy fireworks. There is, however, one exception. A girl named Sara who has not gone along with the crowd.

The teacher asks her why she has decided to be different.

“Because I’m not a Democrat.”

“Then,” asks the teacher, “what are you?”

“I’m a Republican.”

The teacher is a little perturbed now, her face slightly red. She asks Sara why she is a Republican.

“Well, I was brought up knowing and loving my country. My Mom is a Republican, and my dad is a Republican, so I am a Republican.”

The teacher is now angry. “That’s no reason,” she says loudly. “What if your Mom was a moron and your dad was a moron. What would you be then?”

A pause and a smile. “Then,” says Sara, “I’d be a Democrat.”


30 posted on 08/24/2009 9:34:31 AM PDT by Lady Jag (Double your income. Fire the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

31 posted on 08/24/2009 9:39:24 AM PDT by Lady Jag (Double your income. Fire the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Addicted To LAW; Old Sarge; darkwing104; paulycy; darkangel82; 50mm
We try to give it to you as straight as possible.

Oh, we do too.

ZOT!

32 posted on 08/24/2009 10:37:44 AM PDT by rabscuttle385 (May God save the American Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Addicted To LAW
The author of the column on your site stated that parents abuse their parental influence in allowing their child to be dressed in an Obama hat.

You respond with: I believe your argument would have standing if The One wasn’t in office. But Obama is in Office. I do not see this as normal politics. This is politics taken to a different level. Not to be mistaken as being taken the “next” level. This is just a level where we have not seen or experienced in this nation.

You respond with a very poor understanding of parental rights if this is what you'd like others to think passes as your reasoned opinion. Our rights as parents are not dependent on who is president or how much you like them. It has nothing to do with whether or not you see it as "normal politics" or not. Since it isn't your child, you have no right to have your opinion considered at all.

See, my children are not yours to raise. The kid with a hat is not yours to raise. Your kids are not mine to raise, which is why I don't care how you dress them, what church you take them too, or what you feed them.

You wrote: Parents should be able to teach their children as they see fit. In today’s world, that is not the case. The public school system and mass media have taken over that job.

That is complete and utter garbage. Parents can send their child to any school they can afford and teach them anything they like. And honestly, if you're so concerned with this "takeover" of parental rights, why are you arguing to take away a parent's right to dress their child as they like?

You seem very quick to jump on the "abuse" bandwagon, using the weaker-than-weak excuse that that this president is different. He may be different, but it still isn't "abuse".

Child abuse is punishable in the criminal court by jail time and in the family court by loss of the child. Beating a child is abuse. Starving a child is abuse. Sexually abusing a child is abuse. Abandoning a child is abuse. Neglecting a child is abuse. Putting a hat on a child is not abuse.

33 posted on 08/24/2009 12:04:09 PM PDT by mountainbunny (Mitt Romney: Would you buy a used car from this man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Addicted To LAW
You wrote: ...replies are made when possible. We have to be made a aware if there is a need for a reply. This is one of the reasons why we try to encourage readers to post comments on our main site. In order to properly manage replies.

What, in your experience, tells you that it is morally and/or ethically correct to lead traffic away from this site using someone else's money, bandwidth and effort?

My sense of ethics tells me that that is really, really wrong. Why doesn't yours?

34 posted on 08/24/2009 12:11:22 PM PDT by mountainbunny (Mitt Romney: Would you buy a used car from this man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

IBTZ!

Thanks for the heads up Old Sarge!


35 posted on 08/24/2009 12:41:52 PM PDT by Atom Smasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lady Jag

LOL!

Ping!


36 posted on 08/24/2009 12:47:11 PM PDT by Atom Smasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mountainbunny; Addicted To LAW
You wrote: ...replies are made when possible. We have to be made a aware if there is a need for a reply. This is one of the reasons why we try to encourage readers to post comments on our main site. In order to properly manage replies.

Sorry, Addicted To LAW, I'm not going to be posting any comments on your blog so that you can *properly manage* my replies.

What do you guys think? That I need a thought babysitter? You want everyone to come to your site so you can manage their opinion? Who the H E double toothpicks do you guys think you are?

I'm not interested in having my freedom speech infringed by you and your cohorts. I'm certainly not going to be suckered into leaving FR.

I'm not interested in co-operating with your 1984, thought police mentality. Find some other sucker.

37 posted on 08/24/2009 3:11:27 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge; Addicted To LAW

Sarge, I appreciate the heads up.

I searched and found much more than I ever wanted to know about the person in question:
“a Professional Speaker, Life & Business Coach, Internet Radio Show Host, Author,” and a self-proclaimed unlicensed medical professional.


38 posted on 08/24/2009 4:18:24 PM PDT by Sparko (December 7: National Day of Thanks for Birth of Obama - possibly in Hawaii, Kenya, maybe Canada)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Addicted To LAW
IBTZ!


39 posted on 08/24/2009 5:16:12 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (http://www.conservatives4palin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson