Posted on 09/13/2009 2:27:53 PM PDT by vrwc1
ping
Gitmo!!!
Because of previous spineless and cowardly judges, that's why!!!
Sounds like Judge Carter ordered it.
He will never miss a fart to paint Orly as incompetent, but he is probably a very competent armchair keyboard “attorney,” something like John Edwards. Just wait for his firing squat!!!
Subponeaing records does not put Obama in the role of self-incrimination, as he will not be supplying the document, if it exists. The State of Hawaii will, and he will not be involved. If this is true, then any other documents from colleges, schools, hospitals, selective service, immigration, fulbright foundation, passports, all fall under the purvue of discovery, and none of them directly involve Obama...
Why are you certain? did you go to college at the same time as he? Did you know him? What makes you so certain?
That’s kinda what I thought. The whole idea of subpoenas is set up to allow evidence to be gathered regardless of fifth amendment constraints.
As for NS: I’ve been watching him for quite awhile and I think I’ve got him pretty well figured out. There’s lots of guys like him on the net. Hell, some people even think I’m one of them. I guess it all depends on your point of view.
i found a case called Burton v. United States. (an ineligible Federal officeholder. The SCOTUS heard the case.)
i am new at this whole NBC matter. Is someone collecting information?
Judge don't like being lied to by attorneys. (Honest judges that is) If proven, someone could go to jail, or lose their law license.
He's already moved the discovery process to the magistrate judge. If either side wants something, now or later, they have to go to him to get a subpoena for it. Whatever limits he put on discovery for now, will be implemented by the magistrate judge.
Not the coastal strip, which included Mombasa. They were administered together, but were tehnically separate until independence. The strip, also known as the Witu protectorate, nominally belonged to the Sultan of Zanzibar.
The Witu protectorate had been part of German East Africa (Tanganyika) but was annexed in 1890. It is the hinterland area inland from the coast. The coast of Kenya with Mombasa etc... was nominally a possession of the Sultan of Zanzibar, and so was officially a British Protectorate. However Kenya Colony and Protectorate were administered as a single unit with a single flag-badge. This sort of arrangement was quite common in British African territories, although it was more usual for the Colony to be on the coast and the Protectorate inland.
I want it followed according to the law. If you choose to dismiss that as dotting "i's" and crossing "t's" then so be it.
While it is important that all the proper steps be taken I think it is far more important that we get to the bottom of the issue.
If the plaintiff doesn't meet the legal definition of standing the I think it's far more important that the case be dismissed than for the law to be twisted or ignored to get at one man, regardless of who he is.
BTW, do you just sit around all day and night pecking at the keyboard? I have an excuse since I’m retired and mildly disabled... I don’t have much of anything else to do.
Hobby. I was watching the football game and hanging out here.
And if Judge Carter dismisses this case in October, will he suddenly change from stand-up former Marine to "spineless and cowardly" in the eyes of y'all?
They should be doing that without the judges order. Taitz should have her evidence lined up, her subpoenas ready, her list of depositions drawn up, and be ready to hit the ground. The defense is going to want to see all of it.
But most of all she should be working on her response to the motion to dismiss. Especially the proofreading part.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.