Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

European Missile Defense: Surrender And Betrayal Or Secret Deal?
LuckyBogey's Blog ^ | September 18, 2009 | LuckyBogey

Posted on 09/18/2009 1:48:50 PM PDT by luckybogey

CBO compares the potential cost and performance of MDA’s proposed European system with the cost and performance of three other options for deploying missile defenses in Europe...

* Defense of Europe. All of the alternatives CBO considered would provide defense of most of Europe roughly equivalent to the defense provided by MDA’s proposal against most types of ballistic missiles that Iran is thought to have developed or could develop in the future...

* Extended Defense of the United States. MDA’s proposed system would complement the coverage already available from U.S.-based interceptors by providing redundant defense from a third interceptor site for all of the continental United States. None of the alternatives considered by CBO provide as much additional defense of the United States. Deploying Kinetic Energy Interceptors would add defense from a third redundant interceptor site for about 75 percent of the U.S. population in range of ICBMs from Iran. Deploying land-based or sea-based Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) Block IIA interceptors would provide additional defense for about one-half or less of the U.S. population.

* Costs. For roughly the same cost as MDA’s European system—a total of about $9 billion to $14 billion over 20 years—the United States could deploy either SM-3 interceptors or Kinetic Energy Interceptors at its existing bases in Germany and Turkey, supported by tracking radars in Azerbaijan and Qatar. At greater cost, the United States could deploy SM-3 interceptors on U.S. Navy ships and station them permanently at three locations in European waters. That system would cost almost twice as much as MDA’s proposal—a total of about $18 billion to $26 billion over 20 years—largely because CBO assumed that the Navy would need to buy additional ships to operate it...

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics; Reference
KEYWORDS: czech; mda; poland; russia
Czech US Missile Defense Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer gestures during the press conference in Prague

Posted in Bloggers Section. Blog Post includes: A Bad Day for Freedom — Reversal on Missile Defense Shield in Europe Video — Russia positive on new US defense plans — Inhofe Decries Cancellation of Missile Defense Shield Video — Morning Bell: Surrender and Betrayal Do Not Make Us Safer — CBO Options for Deploying Missile Defenses in Europe(Feb 09 - PDF - 84 Pages)

1 posted on 09/18/2009 1:48:51 PM PDT by luckybogey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: luckybogey

Yalta II

2 posted on 09/18/2009 1:52:13 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luckybogey

obambi is backing away, retreating again. He is a cocaine freaked closet homosexual moslem communist. He he finds a way to become even more of a scumbag, he will.

Poland better learn its lessons from the 1930s.

obambi did this on the 17th for a reason, what it was is the question.

3 posted on 09/18/2009 1:53:52 PM PDT by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luckybogey

With “Mack Daddy the Zebra” involved you can count that it’s a benefit to him and a back stab to all others.

“Mack Daddy the Zebra”, the joke heard around the world and trusted by nobody.

4 posted on 09/18/2009 1:56:13 PM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luckybogey

Yesterday, Savage (who I rarely listen to) suggested Obama cancelled it in return for a greenlight from Russia for Israel to attack Iran. It didn’t make sense to me but who knows...

5 posted on 09/18/2009 1:59:25 PM PDT by SMCC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luckybogey
Question: "European Missile Defense: Surrender And Betrayal Or Secret Deal?"

Response: It really does not matter. For one can assert without fear of contradiction; that, whatever steps of an important nature this administration takes positive harm will result to American interests. We are now in that phase of our history spoken of in 1888 by a Great Historian: ".. in declining states the leadership intuitively choses the most harmful course of action."

6 posted on 09/18/2009 2:10:12 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


I heard Savage say that last night. Possible but I’m not so sure. I believe the deal was agreed when Obama was in Moscow in July when Russia allowed our use of their airspace to Afghan.

After reading the CBO report WE DO HAVE OPTIONS and it is possible we have improved technology for mobile platforms on ships to communicate with land based radar.

However, why now before the G-20 meeting? A phone call to Poland and the Czechs is unacceptable and not the way to treat your allies who are helping us in Afghanistan.

7 posted on 09/18/2009 2:19:16 PM PDT by luckybogey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC
Once again an Acolyte of the Anti-Christ betrayed Poland and the Polish people ~ on the 70th anniversary of the last time an Acolyte of the Anti-Christ did so.

That's why it happened ~ the celebration.

These Acolytes are so terribly transparent ~ yet, they think they are invisible.

8 posted on 09/18/2009 7:18:38 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson