Posted on 09/19/2009 11:26:12 AM PDT by pissant
In an effort to confirm the below letter I have contacted Ft. Benning. There is something that has come to my attention that supports my suspicions about this letter even more. If Capt. Connie Rhodes was being shipped out to Iraq yesterday, she would NOT have been allowed to leave base and go to a Columbus, GA OfficeMax to fax this letter. In fact one would think the letter would and could have been fax directly from the Army Base and placed in the mail at the same time right on base at Ft. Benning.
Interestingly enough the store video at the OfficeMax store where this document was faxed from will provide Judge Land and U.S. Marshalls clear proof as to who faxed this letter to the U.S. District Court Judge.
Question: Can anyone send me the Notarized Statement of Capt. Rhodes claiming her supervisor refused to allow her to appear in the U.S. District Court in Columbus, GA on 9-11-09? It seems the document has been scrubbed. Looks like all the mentions linked to the document from Orly Taitz website and it has since been removed with the "404 Page Not Found" message. Why was it removed?
I have just called WRBL-TV in Columbus, Georgia to inform them that the letter claimed to have been sent to U.S. District Court Judge Clay Land by U.S. Army Capt. Connie M. Rhodes appears to have had Capt. Rhodes signature cut and pasted onto it from another document.
Click on the image of the letter above. Look at the signature, there is still a line under the signature from whatever document the maker of this letter cut the signature off of. In addition, notice the angle of the signature line. The actual line has a steady incline from the left to the right. That incline would not be there if the signature line was made from the same computer that the letter was typed on.
If I am correct, and I believe in all my heart that I am, someone intentionally sent this letter to a U.S. District Court Judge knowing it to be a fraud. I have advised the Columbus Georgia CBS affiliate WRBL-TV of this and that they may want to attempt to contact Capt. Rhodes and confirm the letter was issued by her, which I told them I doubt it was.
Now, who would knowingly file a forged letter impersonating a U.S. Army Capt. with a U.S. District Court?
PING
over here
Stupid Larry shows his hand. NEVER SHOW YOUR HAND to these thugs & their SRM!
Something does look very off, not only the line, but it looks like it grabbed a part of something right below it from the source. That isn't a remnant from being faxed, compressed, or converted, it is an actual line and top of a typed letter.
Sinclair has become quite adept at sniffing out forgeries. He’s be the subject of many dozens since he exposed Obama as a gay crack whore.
To play devil’s advocate on my previous, what the line could be is where she wrote this in a blank Word doc and created a signature line herself using the drawing tool. That is why it has the stair-step look, she didn’t make it straight. The dot below it could just be from her own pen she used to sign. It still looks weird. The solution would be to see if this was pulled off another document by superimposing the signatures and see if it can be determined what it came from or if it is unique.
The biggest suspicion is the tone of the letter, frankly.
Has she made any direct statements herself to the media or has the judge stated he talked to her. A first hand statement in one of the many news reports or legal docs could confirm or deny.
I don’t read too much into the ‘tone’ because I don’t know what her natural writing tone is. To judge the tone, you would need a base to judge it against.
Ant:
The date at the beginning of the letter looks suspicious to me.
I don’t believe that military correspondence instructions of any of the services requires the superscript “th” on dates.
Matter of fact, I know that Navy/USMC dates when I served were written thus: 18 Sep 2009
I also attended a US Army school as a Marine Officer and I recall that their dating sequences was similar to the Navy/USMC correspondence requirements... never a superscript... even on an Unofficial Letter...
Anybody?
This of course, proves that he's the Son of Satan, the Spawn of Beelzebub and the Prince of Darkness, himself. As the advocate of evil in the flesh, he would posses penetrating powers of mind-control which would explain the unquestionable manipulation of: The US Army, dozens of District Court Judges, at least 18 Appellate Judges and the Nine Supreme Court Justices.
If Obama is able to unite the Crystal Skulls, find the Priory of Scion and unlock the secret compartment in his Kennedy desk, who knows what galactic shenanigans he’ll be capable of.
We don’t need Orley Taitz, we need the Ghost Busters.
“He’s be the subject of many dozens since he exposed Obama as a gay crack whore.”
Thread winnar.
+1
Address the article, if you can.
Going back to the devil’s advocate argument, if she wrote this herself, at her home on Word, the ‘th’ could be simply from the automatic formatting settings in Word or whatever word processor she uses. She may have typed it 19, Sept 2009 and Word converted it (try it out). You usually can set this up with Options > Formatting > Date format (different versions get there differently.
Where in the heck is that OfficeMax camera?
Well, forgeries beget forgeries, from COLB's on Factcheck to a forged President.
I just did. You need to open your eyes to the enormity of this evil plan before we're all doomed - DOOMED I SAY.
These comments are endorsed by crazy people everywhere
You are blowing smoke out your bunghole, not answering the assertions in the article.
Well "appearances" can be deceiving and they certainly are deceiving you. Happy Halloween.
Agree.
I had no experience with Microsoft Windows/Word, etc while I on active duty.
I believe the Corps was just getting “Windows” and “Office” packages and the ITO’s were installing them when I retired on 1 Jul 1996.
Still, I think the letter “smells.”
Question: Why does the date “Friday, September 18, 2009” omit the “th?” Also, a space is missing in one date, “September 16th,2009.”
/just asking
Don't know about OfficeMax, but Office Depot doesn't let the customer's send their own faxes. You give the material to be faxed, fill out their cover sheet, and they fax it for you. If Office Max does the same, which would not be surprising, then there is an Office Max clerk who may be able to tell if the person sending the fax was Captain Rhodes, or some ACORN minion from their Atlanta office, just a couple of hours up the road from Ft. Benning.
Consider the following scenario:
Cpt. Rhodes didn’t have to leave the base to fax the letter. She could have had a friend or family member fax the letter for her. She could have dictated the letter over the phone and authorized that person to cut and paste her signature on the letter for her.
She would have been very busy getting ready to ship out to Iraq and probably didn’t have time to do any of it herself. She says in the letter that she’ll send an original to the court when she arrives in Iraq.
Now consider the following scenario:
An Obot types the letter and faxes it to the court from an OfficeMax store in Georgia. What would be the objective?
There are store security cameras monitoring the entrance to the store and probably various stations within the store. If the letter is a fake, Cpt. Rhodes will not send an original upon her arrival in Iraq. The absence of that follow-up will likely cause Judge Land to contact Cpt. Rhodes’ superiors to verify that she authored the letter and ask her to submit the original for court records at her earliest possible convenience. At which time, the forgery will be exposed. What damage will this forgery have done? Why go to the trouble?
This could be cleared up in a instant. Seems strange that Capt. Rohdes wouldn’t weigh in on this.....I’m sure she has an e-mail account.
Body versus header?
Word does not automatically insert the ‘th’ or ‘rd’ or ‘nd’ after a date. You must type it in and add a space becore it will superscript it.
I hav never seens militiary correspondence include the ‘th’ and etc as part of the date.
Both dates are in the body of the letter.
The date which includes the “th” is not spaced before the year. The date without a “th” is spaced properly.
Even more interesting. If you look at where this fax was sent from, Office Max, at 1:58PM (the date she shipped out to Iraq), Using White Pages, reverse look-up of the phone number 706-563-3441, it is shown to be a landline, does not specify a business, and in located in Columbus, GA. Now she was leaving that day from Fort Gordon, GA. Google maps says that location is 245 miles away from Fort Gordon, Ga.
1. How can she travel that far from the base on a day she will deploy. Most orders require you on base and ready to go 24 hours in advance of a flight.
2. Why would she fax this from a location so far away on the day she would deploy, when fax machines are on base.
3. When would she decide to write this note, as she was dissappointed by the ruling, and standard procedure is to appeal a decision. Certainly this was discussed. IF she did not want to appeal, doesn’t it make sense that this letter would go to Orly Taitz? and not the Judge?
4. There is no mention that she contacted Orly Taitz to stop the filing, only to the judge...sound fishy?
5. Finally, I find it interesting that we have not heard from the Captain as she said she would contact the California Bar and file a complaint. so far, no complaint.
and most telling of all, is that she is, for now, incommunicado, more than likely traveling to her duty station.
To the protagonist:
What better way to throw a monkeywrench into the works, than to float a fake, it does not matter if its real or not, perception fuels those who do not want her to succeed, and if its not real and the Captain knows nothing about it, the damage is done.
To them, the worst thing that can happen is for everybody to take a wait and see attitude over this.
As has already been shown, the court clerk sent back the order as it apparently was filled out incorrectly. So how could the judge “Apparently” presume a $10K fine, if no such paperwork has been entered into the court???
Facts are Facts, but PERCEPTION is reality...remember that.
they have...
Well, Larry knows what danger this country is in with this fake, fraud usurper.
Each district or circuit court sets their own rules. Most (perhaps all) don't accept fax filings, except in very limited circumstances and under some very specific guidelines. This isn't a filing. It's a letter (ex parte communication) to a judge, what the judge does with it is entirely up to him. I suspect the conversation the Captain had with someone named "Tony" (probably a clerk) in the district court will have some bearing on what the judge did or will do with respect to this letter.
Excerpt from Lame Cherry you may find interesting:
Judge Land though went ballistic in firing a nasty ruling at Orly Taitz and threatening her with sanctions.
The good part is now that Mrs. Taitz either I said by blunder, stupidity, arrogance or planning has walked right into a situation which is about to trap Land in his own rulings.
See Land has now gone berserk as he was already on a short fuse as Taitz has jerked his cord good in basically accusing him of being a shill for Obama politics and it got Land so furious he has read “treason” into the Taitz reply concerning him.
So much so that he has levied a ten thousand dollar fine on the platinum blonde.
This is where the spit hits the fan now, because there are numerous precedents which are basic common law in when someone is accused and punished as Mrs. Taitz is about to, that she will now have a hearing and appeal by higher authorities where she can demand now the Obama secret papers to defend herself.
That was the happening earlier this year when another judge named James Robertson tried to bitch slap an 82 year old lawyer named John Hemenway, with fines over an Obama case.
This was the infamous “Twitter” clause Robertson quoted as Obama was legal because he read it on Twitter.
Attorney Hemenway was no fool and fired back in reply and appeal that the minute he was sanctioned with threats of fines, Hemenway then had full right of disclosure of all Obama papers to defend himself.
Robertson’s testicles shriveled up at that one and simply reprimanded Hemenway, but Hemenway is on appeal and the courts don’t know what to do with the case obviously as Hemenway has his precedents and rights to Obama’s records now.
This is where Orly Taitz has now plunged into. If she plays this correctly, she can do what John Hemenway did and more in demanding full disclosure of Obama’s papers to defend herself and her client.
http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2009/09/orly-taitz-flock-shootin.html
Which means she probably did manually type it just like that and in one case pressed space. It doesn’t make sense for someone to be pasting different parts here and there from different docs (besides the signature question) when you just need to type it in with Word. Simplest explanation, someone just typed it that way.
As to ‘if this is military format’, if she is writing this at home, not as official military correspondence, just quickly tapping it out, I doubt she would give that much thought.
However, if someone wanted to ‘fake’ a letter from her knowing she was in the military, they may think how someone in the military ‘should’ write and pay extra attention to that.
In this case, I think this detail isn’t vital. The signature part is highly unusual.
Her comment on it should close the issue one way or another.
~~~Curious, indeed ..........PING!
Yeah, it's not as if it's just down the block from her. Two hundred and forty-five miles???
IMHO....this much “turmoil” is merely the flak over the target in so many ways....continue to pray for revelation of truth...
The U.S. District Courts absolutely do accept faxed documents. They like to have original copies for their records, but they accept faxes for many reasons: filing deadlines, out-of-town emergency testimony, etc. If the court had to wait to receive original documentation on everything, justice would move even more slowly than it does now.
Lets hope she uses the document just as it is, change the names to her own and her client in the case, and fire it back. Hemenway is brilliant, and he b#tch slapped Robertson in his own game.
I sent her the link, I hope others do too...
Consider the scenario I posted in #24. It addressed most, if not all, of your questions.
No it doesn’t make sense that this letter would go to Orly instead of Judge Land. Rhodes was complaining to Judge Land about Orly and informing him that Orly doesn’t represent her anymore. Additionally Orly had already filed with the court, so any letter to Orly wouldn’t have stopped the filing.
No it isn’t fishy that Rhodes didn’t speak to Orly about the filing. She was ticked that Orly took it upon herself to file the stay request and wanted to make sure that she communicated directly with Judge Land rather than leaving it to Orly’s incompetence to withdraw the request.
Rhodes said it was her plan to file a complaint with the California State Bar. I imagine she’s very busy arriving in Iraq and getting settled. No such complaint is likely to be filed by Rhodes for at least a week or more.
The paperwork was filed with the court. It was sent back for corrections, but it is still on record with the court. The judge has every right to sanction Orly, not only for frivilous filings, but also for her despicable comments about the judge. She’s so unprofessional.
Please apply some common sense instead of seeing a conspiracy in every action.
She’ll have to tailor it a little to her case but the basis is the same.
Thanks,....
I read that the fax location was in Columbus, GA the same city where the court is located. Why not walk the letter to the court if you’re that close instead she faxed it?
That would be great! A few more of these types of rulings, fines and appeals and they can probably file for class action and fight the usurper as a team instead of individually. I’m also confident that Judge Carter will rule favorably in wanting to see the discovery of 0bama’s documentation from Hawai’i. The long form, any adoption records, any aliases used while living in that state, his school records, any passports used (from USA or any foreign nation), etc.
Judge Carter needs to allow and encourage active pursuit of the truth and the facts in regards to all things 0bama.
LOL. Not nearly as unprofessional as the bitch Land.
Here's the Capt Rhodes' original statement regarding her supervisor
preventing her from showing up in court (dated Sept 10) - un-cropped:
(click to open thumbnail)
Here's a side-by-side of the Sept 10 letter (cropped for comparison) and the latest letter from Sept 18.
Look for any inconsistencies in signature, signature block, writing style, etc (let the fun begin):
Very interesting.
BUMP
Good work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.