Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen Poll – 42% Agree With a Randomly Selected Congress
http://www.CongressionalLotteryPool.com ^

Posted on 10/02/2009 8:36:33 PM PDT by TLittlefella

42% of voters agree that people randomly selected from a phone book would do a better job in Congress than the current Congress.

It is time to flush the corruption out of Congress. It’s time to vote out the career politicians who are destroying America.

It is time to run non political candidates for Congress.

Should we take our country back by replacing career politicians in Congress with common citizens? Cast your vote:

http://www.CongressionalLotteryPool.com

It's time for real change!


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: congress; lottery; politicians; sniff

1 posted on 10/02/2009 8:36:34 PM PDT by TLittlefella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TLittlefella

To get a constitutional amendment you need three quarters of the states.


2 posted on 10/02/2009 8:42:41 PM PDT by donmeaker (Invicto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLittlefella
Welcome to FR!

While I don't generally agree with term limits, for various reasons, there is a point to made in their favor. That being said, this silly notion of 'picking people out of a phone book' is just that --- a silly notion.

Representative government of the people, by the people, and for the people certainly needs some sort of reform and overhaul, but I'm not sold on either term limits or this 'picking people out of the phone-book' thing

3 posted on 10/02/2009 8:44:55 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLittlefella
I don't know whether it's true or not, maybe so. Given the dismal knowledge the average person has of the Constitution, don't bet that we wouldn't get lots more "rights" we'd have to pay for.

I am reading The Politically Incorrect Guide to The Founding Fathers. I think this book needs to be put in the hands of every citizen so that they see how far we've strayed.

4 posted on 10/02/2009 8:45:58 PM PDT by ElectronVolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLittlefella

What’s wrong with the other 58%?

Oh and by the way, welcome to FR?


5 posted on 10/02/2009 8:47:09 PM PDT by 50mm (AARP is a steaming pile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Moonlight

It’s basically how we choose juries, isn’t it? They can hold your life in their hands. I think we should pick representatives the same way we pick jurors.


6 posted on 10/02/2009 8:48:36 PM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TLittlefella
42% of voters agree that people randomly selected from a phone book would do a better job in Congress than the current Congress.

About the same number of people would agree that a person randomly selected from a phone book would do a better job as president than the incumbent.

7 posted on 10/02/2009 8:50:14 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Moonlight
...this silly notion of 'picking people out of a phone book' is just that --- a silly notion.

Nobody is advocating that...people think those picked out of the phone book would do as good as what we've elected.

8 posted on 10/02/2009 8:50:20 PM PDT by lonestar (Obama is turning Bush's "mess" into a catastrophe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Moonlight
'picking people out of a phone book'

Well, it would leave out the cell-phone generation.

9 posted on 10/02/2009 8:51:49 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (RATs, nothing more than bald haired hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TLittlefella

Time to always use the term: Current DEMOCRATICALLY CONTROLLED Congress - or some such description to drive home the truth that the Ds are running this fiasco.


10 posted on 10/02/2009 8:53:17 PM PDT by Anima Mundi (The trouble with trouble is it starts out as Utopia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
It’s basically how we choose juries, isn’t it? They can hold your life in their hands. I think we should pick representatives the same way we pick jurors.

And how exactly would this be administered? A bunch of ppl picked out of a phone book who really don't want to 'serve' or have anything to do with the 'political process', and then filter them all down to the ones who really do .. or who have some sort of ego thing going on where they say "OK, I'm IN"!

Sorry Huck, this just doesn't sell

11 posted on 10/02/2009 8:55:07 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
Nobody is advocating that

Yes they are .. this poll, and others like it, are advocating just that. It's a silly notion, and one which should get nipped in the bud early, like right now, before it catches on with the uninformed sheeple

12 posted on 10/02/2009 8:59:46 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Huck
I think we should pick representatives the same way we pick jurors.

Nope, too many lawyers involved (peremptory challenges, challenges for cause, and all that). I'd prefer a way of picking representatives that has no lawyers involved: come the revolution, we go back to the original Constitution and Bill of Rights (yup, not only no income tax, but indirect election of senators, and the Presidential runner-up gets to be VP. I might grudgingly allow the 13th and 14th Amendments to stay, too), and add a clause forbidding anyone who has practiced law within the past 10 years from running for the House or Senate, and forbidding anyone who has served in Congress from practicing law for 10 years after leaving.

13 posted on 10/02/2009 9:01:51 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Moonlight
Yes they are

No they aren't! It would have a snowball's chance in Hell!

But it would probably work as well!!!!

14 posted on 10/02/2009 9:08:22 PM PDT by lonestar (Obama is turning Bush's "mess" into a catastrophe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
No they aren't! It would have a snowball's chance in Hell! But it would probably work as well!!!!

Hahahahahaa ... OK, whatever :)

15 posted on 10/02/2009 9:12:14 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Maybe we could pick the ‘Twitters’ also .... /laughs


16 posted on 10/02/2009 9:14:07 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David
come the revolution, we go back to the original Constitution and Bill of Rights

No thanks. I'd rather see the more glaring errors fixed. Strike "provide for the general welfare" from the preamble. Strike "regulate interstate commerce." Strike "all laws necessary and proper". Provide a Constitutional means for secession. Just for starters.

And as for the Bill of Rights, rewrite the first amendment. Get rid of "establishment of religion". Obviously too vague. Second amendment, strike the introductory clause. Obviously it leads to misconstruction, when in reality it is superfluous justification. 4th amendment--get rid of "unreasonable". Way too vague. Empowers judges to make their own laws.

I could go on. The Constitution is riddled with errors that we, The People, with the benefit of 200 plus years of experiment, ought to fix. Get rid of the 14th amendment altogether. Add term limits for congress. Etc etc etc.

17 posted on 10/02/2009 9:15:44 PM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TLittlefella

Flush the toilet. The 2010 Battle Cry!!!!


18 posted on 10/02/2009 9:16:09 PM PDT by my small voice (A biased media and an uneducated public is the biggest threat to our democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLittlefella
*snicker*
...good (first) day on FR.
welcome to FR.

19 posted on 10/02/2009 9:16:35 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Zer0 to the voter: "Welcome to 'MY' DeathCARE ® Plan"...Sucker! ...now just die. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David
come the revolution, we go back to the original Constitution and Bill of Rights (yup, not only no income tax, but indirect election of senators, and the Presidential runner-up gets to be VP. I might grudgingly allow the 13th and 14th Amendments to stay, too), and add a clause forbidding anyone who has practiced law within the past 10 years from running for the House or Senate, and forbidding anyone who has served in Congress from practicing law for 10 years after leaving.

Effing Aye!


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

20 posted on 10/02/2009 9:27:39 PM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TLittlefella

21 posted on 10/02/2009 9:37:05 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

Don’t forget the Lobbyist, forbid any lobbyist from ever making contact with anyone in Congress.


22 posted on 10/02/2009 11:44:13 PM PDT by annieokie (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

Thanks for your comment – no changes to the constitution would be required.
CongressionalLotteryPool.com explains how it could be done via a voter lottery.


23 posted on 10/03/2009 5:16:46 AM PDT by TLittlefella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

I’ll second that idea Starboard, but first lets clean up Congress.

Thanks for your response.


24 posted on 10/03/2009 5:16:47 AM PDT by TLittlefella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: my small voice

Hey my small voice,

I like your idea - Flush the toilet. The 2010 Battle cry!!!!

Now if we could just get the Tea Parties to adopt that battle cry we would have some traction.


25 posted on 10/03/2009 5:16:49 AM PDT by TLittlefella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Thanks for the welcome skinkinthegrass.


26 posted on 10/03/2009 5:16:50 AM PDT by TLittlefella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

There is no doubt in my mind the first order of business from a clear thinking non career political Congress would be to relegate all Lobbyist to the state level and the second order of business would be no more pork barrel legislation.


27 posted on 10/03/2009 5:16:53 AM PDT by TLittlefella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TLittlefella
absolutely no PORK barrel legislation. I am with you on that.

That along with the lobbyist and Lawyers have and will bring this country to her knees. They are disgusting. Greed.

Now I am not against Greed, as that is what drives most people to invest, but what the lobbyist and lawyers are doing is nothing more than STEALING legally.

I have always said: The old time outlaws put up their guns away and studied LAW, (John Wesley Hardin), they understood they could steal more by becoming an attorney or politician, and do it with a PEN rather than a gun. They knew how to create the laws that only they could understand and protect us from. GREED. i.e.(John Edwards)

Now those same people do not even want to read the bills they pass???? Try that in a court of law, ignorance is never an excuse. LAWYERS be damned.

28 posted on 10/03/2009 7:04:34 AM PDT by annieokie (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: annieokie
forbid any lobbyist from ever making contact with anyone in Congress

Well, that rules any taxpayer associations/pro Constitution advocates out. (you)

How about:

Forbid any non-profit, government agency, or grant seeking lobbyists or foreign agents from ever making contact with anyone in Congress.

29 posted on 10/03/2009 11:37:15 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (RATs, nothing more than bald haired hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

you made it better, thanks.


30 posted on 10/03/2009 1:08:24 PM PDT by annieokie (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: annieokie
And if the state and federal legislatures hadn't decided they had the right to interfere in a contract between a business entity and an individual...or two entities, the business lobbies would have no need to be up there, begging for their commercial lives.

But on the other hand, there should be no corporate welfare (subsidies) either.

31 posted on 10/03/2009 2:07:14 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (RATs, nothing more than bald haired hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

it is a real mess for sure.


32 posted on 10/03/2009 2:26:00 PM PDT by annieokie (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson