Skip to comments.You're Correct, NY Times: Zero's Whoring Around Is Pretty Sad
Posted on 10/04/2009 8:19:14 AM PDT by bloodmeridian
It's quite damning for Dear Leader when even his concubines at the New York Times think he was off his rocker for traveling to Copenhagen only to get bitch slapped by the 18 votes his beloved Graftland got from the International Olympic Committee after his little speech:
"As for why Mr. Obama went especially if he wasnt sure Chicago would win here are two possible explanations: One, Mr. Obama, and his White House chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, another Chicagoan, love a good competition; the other is that they have a tad too much confidence in Mr. Obamas hortatory powers."
(Excerpt) Read more at feedyouradhd.blogspot.com ...
This has made me wonder if maybe George W. Bush might not have a lot of friends and admirers around the world, people who, rightly so, would be pissed off by BHO’s constant bashing. I think this was personal against BHO more than against America.
The devil, er Daley, made him go to Copenhagen.
1. This stimulus package would create 4 million jobs and stop unemployment from going above 8%.
2. Just one more appearence on national TV, and the public will finally get behind my health care takeover.
3. We can shut down guantanamo bay with no problems.
4. I know how to win in Afghanistan.
5. If I appear in front of the IOC, that will put Chicago over the top.
1. Ego - Barak and Michelle can’t believe that the world isn’t in love with them.
2. Hubris - Imagine the power of taking a 747 to Copenhagen and meeting the Queen with your entourage? And your wife takes a separate plane with her entourage?
3. Corruption - all out effort to do a Chicago-style corrupt misuse of government money.
And people will still re-elect this criminal!
lmao, I kinda like horatory, but to give the man in the White House that much credit is just too much.
Their speeches were all about me, me, me, me, mmmmeeeeEEEEEEeeeeeeEEEEEEeeeeeee! And not enough about the world athletes, what Chicago actually had to offer (maybe because there’s not a lot?) But to try to sell people on the idea of Chicago for its diversity was actually really stupid. The whole freaking world is diverse. Why would you want to go to Chicago for diversity, for pete’s sakes!
I guess he forget he was speaking to the world, and not to his citizenship whom he holds in total disdain because he thinks we all have time to get up every morning wondering who we’re going to hate that day.
He never thought the stimulus package would do squat. Just a transfer of wealth from us to him campaign supporters.
Since HE KNEW it wouldn’t generate any jobs, what a brilliant person! He can now ask for $2-4 trillion MORE STIMULUS. And the media/left will support him.
I saw it somewhere, Valerie Jarrett advised Obama that her "intelligence" was telling her that USA was the favorite to get the 2016 Olympics. She and others told him that making an appearance just might cinch it.
I think you're right, this was a direct smackdown of the Obama administration.
Oh, that's good. That's really good.
It was a business venture — Obama, Madigan, Daley, Emannuel, their cronies and their political machines stood to make hundreds of millions of dollars, and would have had the big hammer of “We must do it for the Olympics” available to them to bang through their schemes for the next 7 years.
Since when did the Old York Times start using brayisms??
Pray for America and Our Troops
You could save a ton of space if you listed what he has been right about.
You probably won't need any more space than this: _.
VERY good! :0)
My other guess was F.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.