Skip to comments.
Obama Allowing Russians to Inspect Nuclear Sites!
Right Handed Pitcher ^
| 10/14/2009
Posted on 10/14/2009 1:41:36 PM PDT by oldskuulconserv
Yes, I wish that this was a satire piece, but unfortunately it appears that this is real. President Obama's Administration is going to allow Russia to inspect our nuclear facilities-- within the United States. This is an unprecedented move that damages US national security. Not only does it lift the veil of secrecy, but if Russia decided to sell the secret information to terrorists or rogue states, attacks could follow.
This is a disgrace.
(Excerpt) Read more at righthandedpitcher.blogspot.com ...
TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: appeasement; bho44; bhonukes; bhorussia; bhotreason; bhotyranny; coldwar2; hillary; nukes; obama; russia; sovietunion; surrendercrats; tm
what the hell are we doing?
To: oldskuulconserv
Madame Secretary is floating a
joint missile defense system with our new co-superpower.
So that explains what she was up to in that black BMW, I guess.
To: oldskuulconserv; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...
3
posted on
10/14/2009 1:45:33 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: oldskuulconserv
4
posted on
10/14/2009 1:46:12 PM PDT
by
ichabod1
( I am rolling over in my grave and I am not even dead yet.)
To: oldskuulconserv
Kinda like giving your house and car keys to the gang banger next door so you can become good friends and avoid any hassles later.
5
posted on
10/14/2009 1:47:17 PM PDT
by
crazyhorse691
(Now that the libs are in power dissent is not only unpatriotic, but, it is also racist.)
To: oldskuulconserv
“what the hell are we doing?”
The first such inspections were in the late 1980s under President Reagan. Reagan signed the INF treaty in December 1987.
6
posted on
10/14/2009 1:47:30 PM PDT
by
Kolokotronis
(Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
To: oldskuulconserv
7
posted on
10/14/2009 1:48:08 PM PDT
by
steelyourfaith
(Limit all U.S. politicians to two terms: One in office and one in prison!)
To: oldskuulconserv

Laughing at the peasants.
8
posted on
10/14/2009 1:50:55 PM PDT
by
Eyes Unclouded
(Step 1: Expel half the party and write off huge chunks of the country. Step 2: ??? Step 3: Profit.)
To: the invisib1e hand
Rootin’-Tootin’-Putin must be laughing his butt off right about now.
9
posted on
10/14/2009 1:57:44 PM PDT
by
Huskrrrr
To: steelyourfaith
you don’t understand the USA.
To: oldskuulconserv
General James Mattoon Scott: I think the signing of a nuclear disarmament pact with the Soviet Union is at best an act of naivete, and at worst an unsupportable negligence. We've stayed alive because we've built up an arsenal, and we've kept the peace because we've dealt with an enemy who knew we would use that arsenal. And now we're asked to believe that a piece of paper will take the place of missile sites and Polaris submarines, and that an enemy who hasn't honored one solemn treaty in the history of its existence will now, for our convenience, do precisely that. I have strong doubts, gentlemen.
General James Mattoon Scott: And if you want to talk about your oath of office, I'm here to tell you face to face, President Lyman, that you violated that oath when you stripped this country of its muscles - when you deliberately played upon the fear and fatigue of the people and told them they could remove that fear by the stroke of a pen. And then when this nation rejected you, lost faith in you, and began militantly to oppose you, you violated that oath by not resigning from office and turning the country over to someone who could represent the people of the United States.
To: oldskuulconserv
what the hell are we doing? Goin' global.
12
posted on
10/14/2009 2:15:25 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Everybody knows it's a spotted dog...)
To: oldskuulconserv
This is not all that alarming or newsworthy. We have exported nukes to India, and NASA is teaching China all the tricks of our space program. It’s a weird world; get used to it.
13
posted on
10/14/2009 2:26:21 PM PDT
by
La Enchiladita
(GO DODGERS!!! ALL THE WAY!!!)
To: oldskuulconserv
Such inspections are not unprecedented.
The question is, will Obama have secrecy safeguards in place that match those of Reagan?
Reagan was motivated by love for the United States and a fierce protective instinct. What’s Obama’s motivation?
14
posted on
10/14/2009 2:28:37 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
To: oldskuulconserv
Statement: "Obama Allowing Russians to Inspect Nuclear Sites!"
Response: For America this clown intuitively choses the most harmful course of action.
15
posted on
10/14/2009 2:31:48 PM PDT
by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: oldskuulconserv
Soros paid a lot for this one. ChiComs, Saudis, AQ and Russia, too. Oh yes. Forgot Iran.
16
posted on
10/14/2009 2:39:16 PM PDT
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
To: oldskuulconserv
To: oldskuulconserv
So how is this different than the following?
In all, the United States conducted 540 inspections and Russia (prior to December 25, 1991 - the Soviet Union) conducted 311 inspections as detailed in the table below.
http://www.dtra.mil/oe/osi/programs/ops/inf/index.cfm
18
posted on
10/14/2009 3:32:56 PM PDT
by
Sparko
(Barack Hussein Obama: Mmm, mmm, mmm... Peace Prize. Now no one is equal to Me in My Sight.)
To: Sparko
To: oldskuulconserv
In the spirit of friendship, I guess we should give Russia an F-22 like the British gave Stalin their Jet Engine.
20
posted on
10/14/2009 4:07:00 PM PDT
by
Kickass Conservative
(Conservatives THINK people are smart. Liberals KNOW people are stupid.)
To: oldskuulconserv; rxsid; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; ...

Obama Allowing Russians to Inspect Nuclear Sites
.
21
posted on
10/14/2009 4:10:30 PM PDT
by
LucyT
To: Kolokotronis
This is NOT any sort of trust but verify like the 80’s program was. It is a one sided treaty, only for Russia’s benefit.
22
posted on
10/14/2009 4:12:44 PM PDT
by
Thunder90
(Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
To: Sparko
How is it different... We are not inspecting Russian sites!
23
posted on
10/14/2009 4:13:46 PM PDT
by
Thunder90
(Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
To: luckybogey
Learn to read carefully. I was referring to past inspections’ agreements.
24
posted on
10/14/2009 4:14:19 PM PDT
by
Sparko
(Barack Hussein Obama: Mmm, mmm, mmm... Peace Prize. Now no one is equal to Me in My Sight.)
To: Thunder90
“This is NOT any sort of trust but verify like the 80s program was. It is a one sided treaty, only for Russias benefit.”
Ah, I see. It was a Reagan treaty so it must have been OK; like the Reagan bill mandating tax payer paid for medical care at emergency rooms for illegal aliens was a good thing, but if the Dims have anything to do with it its bad, right?
25
posted on
10/14/2009 4:20:52 PM PDT
by
Kolokotronis
(Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
To: Thunder90
Thank you. That is of course different than the previous START.
But I can’t find the details of a renegotiated Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty. Do you have a link?
26
posted on
10/14/2009 4:30:27 PM PDT
by
Sparko
(Barack Hussein Obama: Mmm, mmm, mmm... Peace Prize. Now no one is equal to Me in My Sight.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson