Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
(View past Libertarian pings here)
Posted on 10/16/2009 9:44:25 AM PDT by Victory111
On October 1, 2009, the Obama administration in conjunction with the Egyptian government, introduced an anti-free speech measure to the United Nation’s Human Rights Council (HRC). It was adopted the next day without a vote.
Earlier this year, when the United States sought a seat on the HRC, it was a controversial decision. Many who found the HRC neither credible nor useful, opposed the move. Yet, others were more optimistic that America could change the HRC from within. Perhaps the U.S. could spur debate stemming from its opposition to China, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, and Saudi Arabia on critical human rights votes.
(Excerpt) Read more at crossactionnews.com ...
No surprise from a muzzie dictator wanna be.
As a Pork-eating Crusader, I will continue to exercise my GOD given right to free speech!
***But even under a strict construction, when the US signs a treaty, the treaty becomes binding on the US.***
And when that treaty violates part of the Constitution? What then? Seems to me like the Constitution should win that battle.
I fear you areright, and it’s one of the parts of the Constitution I have always disliked.
anything he signs with another country, G20, UN works against our freedoms. He has no alliance to US
From: Is Obama's Stance On Iran Based Upon His Faith?
For many people, it is becoming obvious that once more America is leading the West, by setting a new trend: America is the first Western nation under the rulership of a Muslim and more specifically a Sunni Muslim. Outside the fact that Obama's father was Muslim, a Somalie black Arab, to be specific and his step father was Muslim, a Pakistani Sunni, and the fact that he studied as a child in Madras, there can be no doubt that he is a Muslim. It is Islamic Shari law that any child or bride of a Muslim is thus themselves a Muslim, which is why Solemn Rushdie is condemned as a apostate or heretic Muslim, even though he has never practiced the faith: but his parents did.
Further, it is state in the Koran, that apostates must be put to death, and if Obama had left the faith, surely some one out there, by now, would be issuing Fatawas against him. Since there is an absolute lack of such, it can only be concluded that there is no need for them, due to the fact of his faith. link>
Lou Dobbs reported on it, sorry no date shown:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KB6u8y2ON4&feature=player_embedded
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.