Skip to comments.Judge Carter Refuses To Dismiss [WARNING: THIS STORY IS A HOAX]
Posted on 10/24/2009 12:32:31 PM PDT by American Dream 246
In a move that has the Plantiffs "amazingly overjoyed," Judge David O. Carter has turned down the Governments motion for Dismissal in the case of Barnett vs. Obama.
"This is a victory for democracy and the people of America," Rancho Santa Margarita-based attorney Orly Taitz said after this mornings early meeting in the Judges offices.
"This means that, come January, the President of the United States will be forced to come into this same courtroom and explain his massive fraud to the American people."
Taitz represents Capt. Pamela Barnett and other military officers who question orders from the commander in chief, as well as Presidential Candidate Alan Keyes. She has tried similar lawsuits elsewhere, but has failed, most recently in Georgia, where U.S. District Court Judge Clay Land not only rejected the lawsuit Taitz filed, but then fined her $20,000 for filing a "frivolous" appeal.
Taitz is joined in this lawsuit by Ramona-based lawyer Gary G. Kreep, who unsuccessfully tried to sever his case from hers.
"Im astounded, quite frankly," Kreep commented. "I really thought, after the last Court session, that we werent going to get this far. I guess I should have given Judge Carter more credit than I did."
The case revolves around whether Obama was born in the United States. In the previous hearing, in which the Government presented its Motion to Dismiss the case, Carter seemed skeptical that a courtroom was the appropriate place for such a matter to be decided.
Department of Justice attorneys Roger West and David DeJute had argued that only Congress can remove a president through impeachment. The only way the courts could be involved was to have the chief justice of the Supreme Court preside over the impeachment trial.
Both West and DeJute refused to comment.
By WIRE SERVICES -- Story Published: Oct 23, 2009 at 8:50 PDT
This item is just breaking and I would consider it as "Not Verified." There are only a couple of sources on the Internet at the moment, and Taitz doesn't have a comment on her blog.
BTTT....this should be a good thread!!
Is this accurate? If so, the case will have to eventually work it's way up to the USSC.
By then, his counterfeit BC will be ready.
It wouldn’t surprise me if this is the reason why BO declared a swine flu emergency in order to have martial law declared either on the federal level or imposed on the state level thereby preventing the people from speaking out against him and his usurpation of the Constitution.
Damn and I was banking on the fact that Obama didn’t care about the sick children....
Asked White House Via Email for name of Obama birth Doctor as registered on his long form version Birth Certificate because I wanted to make a donation to the Childrens ward of the Kapiolani Hospital (of his birth) in the name of the Doctor that brought forth the first President from Hawaii this was purely for historical relevance and the WH refused a response to the request so I thought Obama must not care about the sick kids in Hawaii. Why else would he be so selfish to withold such a trivial stat?
Mark me down as majorly doubting skeptic that would love to be proven wrong.
Given all the “good news” false alarms on this, one shouldn’t pay too much attention to a release that even admits being not yet verified.
Does anybody remember how often we used to see threads here that said “Iraqi Sources: Zarqawi Definitely Captured!”? This reminds me of that.
Still, here’s hopin’.
So I have my fingers crossed hoping that it's true but it will take more than this blog to convince me.
now we know why 0bambi declared a state of emergency.....
Yep, it’s just a rickroll. Check the link at the bottom of the article at the original source.
If this were true don’t you think she’d have gotten it up on the blog very quickly?
1 Certified copy of original birth certificate
2 Columbia University transcripts
3 Columbia thesis paper
4 Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups
5 Harvard University transcripts
6 Illinois State Senate records
7 Illinois State Senate schedule
8 Law practice client list and billing records/summary
9 Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mother
10 Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
11 Occidental College Transcripts
12 Parents marriage Certificate
13 Record of baptism
14 Selective Service registration records
15 Schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
16 Passport records for all passports
17 Scholarly articles
18 SAT and LSAT test scores
19 Access to his grandmother in Kenya
20 List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists
21 Punahou grade school records
22 Noelani Kindergarten records are oddly missing from the the State of Hawaii Department of Education.
23 Page 11 of Stanley Ann Dunham's divorce decree.
Anyone who cares about their country would be very concerned that a POTUS had hidden every scrap of information of his life that he possibly could.
“This item is just breaking and I would consider it as “Not Verified.” There are only a couple of sources on the Internet at the moment, and Taitz doesn’t have a comment on her blog.”
This story looks and smells like a hoax.
Yep. Follow the links and you end up at YouTube with Rick Astley. FAKE.
What happened to Zarqawi?
Judge Carter Refuses To Dismiss but apparently has refused to rule either at the point in time..
What? Stop believing everything you see on television. The judge is going to write his ruling, then hand it to a clerk who's going to enter it into the official record, and then into the case management system known as PACER. No one is going to be "in the courtroom" and no one is going to "put restrictions on Orly about letting the news get out".
Plaintiff's and Defense counsel are going to find out about the decision the exact same time as everyone else - when it's posted on PACER. If it's not on PACER, then there's no decision.
The stupidity that surrounds this insane circus is an embarrassment to real conservatives everywhere.
crossing my fingers ... while .... praying for protection and wisdom for Judge Carter.
Tee, hee, hee.
AFTER-birthers are on the way no doubt.
I AM LOVING IT!
Click on the wavenews source link and you get taken here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yu_moia-oVI
I will be really surprised if Judge Carter actually ruled against Obama. Read the following:
“Oct. 17, 2009) In a stunning blow to the impartiality of the American Judicial system, Federal Judge David O. Carter, who is hearing the case Barnett vs. Obama, in the Central District, Southern Division Court at Santa Ana, California, has just hired a lawyer who works for a law firm where Robert F. Bauer, one of Obamas top lawyers is a partner. And that, just days before the Oct. 5, 2009 hearing on the Motion to Dismiss, in which his demeanor radically changed, according to Dr. Orly Taitz, esq., lead counsel for the Plaintiffs.
Siddharth Velamoor is the lawyer chosen by Carter to serve as one of his two official clerks, from Oct. 1, 2009, till Sept. 30, 2010, according to Wikipedia. Velamoor is listed as an associate with Perkins Coie, LLPs office in Seattle, Washington. It is not clear if he has broken his relations with the firm.
Robert F. Bauer, is a partner of Perkins Coie, LLPs office in Washington, D.C.. His bio at the company identifies him as holding the Chair of the Political Law group at the firm; general counsel to Obamas Campaign for America and general counsel to the Democratic National Committee.
Mr. Bauers wife is none other than Anita Dunn, the Whitehouse Communications Director.
Mr. Bauer, who represented Obama in a case challenging his eligibility in the spring, wrote a letter on April 3, threatening a citizen if he should continue to seek justice in the courts. You can read more about that case and letter here.
Since it appears that Siddharth Velamoor could be influenced by Perkins Coie, if the case did not go Obamas way; his presence in Judge Carters chambers clearly impugns the integrity of the court, and will be the cause of dismay among the general public. Indeed since Velamoor will in the near future need a job reference from Perkins Coie, he will always have to be careful not to offend them politically. Please continue reading by clicking HERE.”
Yep saw that also......
“Judge Carter Refuses To Dismiss but apparently has refused to rule either at the point in time.”
Delay is the deadliest form of denial.
Is this story from the same Obama File that was previously taken down due to a lack of donations?
Think of what a sick mind it takes to fabricate an announcement like this given the gravity of the issues at hand. Wouldn’t surprise me if one or more of our FR obamanoids were the source for a false info release.
Do you need us to define rickrolling for you?
Better to decleare a National emergency for a distraction.
How about H1N1?
I wonder if Rush, Sean, Michelle, Fox, Glenn, Mark and others will finally cover this story?
I do not see how this is related?
Can’t find any thing from the court on such a ruling...more BS
DEFINITELY A FRAUD!! We’ve been rickrolled. And Judge Carter continues to take his sweet a$$ time.
This really surprises me after reading the entire transcript from that dismissal hearing.... IF it is true.
Yeah, speaking of certifreaks, where is Rahm-Sequitor?
That's not surprising. At all.
Anyone with a brain who can’t see that Bozo is hiding something by refusing to show his BC has sh** for brains. The man is clearly NOT a natural born citizen or he would have proved it by now. There is no other explanation for hiring lawyers to try to get judges(and succeeding in most cases)to dismiss the law suits. He is hiding something and he is a chronic liar. He needs to be kicked out of office and if we had a legislature that was for the people instead of for themselves he would have been impeached by now for gross violations of the constitution.
Please, see the docket. There is nothing new in Barnett et al v Obama et al. Dont pay attention to rumors and dirt circulating on the Internet. Remember who we are fighting.
Posted on | October 24, 2009 | No Comments
You are spot on. This is an embarrassment. Check Pacer or talk to a lawyer and find out how things are done. This has hoax all over it.
The chief justice of the SCOTUS is a willing co-conspirator in this case.
The story is fake, but accurate.