Skip to comments.How Many Ways Can Obama Blame Bush?
Posted on 10/30/2009 5:41:31 AM PDT by Alaphiah123
Here we go again the insistent blaming of the former president. President Barry Hussein Soetoro just cant help himself. He has pointed the finger of blame at the previous president and the administration that preceded him more than all of the previous presidents combined have blamed a predecessor.
President Soetoro undoubtedly is a sufferer of Bush derangement syndrome. Charles Krauthammer takes president Soetoro to task for his puerile need to finger point at the Bush administration. (see 2:32 min. video)
(Excerpt) Read more at creatingorwellianworld-view-alaphiah.blogspot.com ...
A true sign of NON-leader
Move out and let Bush move back in.
Next time let’s not pick a guy that puts a target on his back. GWB has given Obama 100 ‘get out of a bad economy’ amd ‘get out of a losing war strategy’ passes. A better republican and Obama’s polls numbers would be in the 30s.
Future government newspaper headline
“Our dear leader, now 90, fell and broke his hip. He was pushed by booosh.”
I'm starting to think it is the same number of times that Jesus can forgive us of our sins.
puerile: childish, juvenile
Incessantly blaming others is the objective inability and lack of courage to be honest with one's self, a primary characteristic of every juvenile. The mass Media for instance is totally juvenile, every day, every hour, every minute, the talking heads (some nice looking ones) are juveniles, having absolutely no responsibility for anything, just verbal assault. In other words, a joke.
Like Barack Obama and his followers.
But as posted elsewhere Barack Obama was consciously chosen by the Left for this very reason - that is, those living in the emotional irrational world cannot separate the juvenile from the realities of life. And it appears that is now a majority of US citizens.
The majority of Americans do not know what freedom is.
How long can they blame Bush? Ask Herbert Hoover.
Obama would blame his predecessor no matter what. He’s a Twink. Don’t blame Dubya because Obama is thin-skinned, insecure, and an idiot.
Believe me, up to the last days he inhabits the Oval office, he will be blaming Bush for every bad thing that happens under his, Obama’s, term or terms. And there are a lot more disasters to happen under Obama. He’s just getting started wrecking the country.
My concern is not who Obama blames. My main concern is if it sells. That is what determined the last two elections.
Every president will blame the past one, either directly or indirectly (using media commentators.) And many times it is valid. You would agree that GWB was not (entirely) responsible for Sept 11, 2001 attacks and 2001 market crash, nor could he be. Much of what he had to work with his first nine months was left over from Clinton.
Well like it or not Obama inherited a huge mess. I know last December Rush was claiming the market was crashing because Obama was elected. You may or may not believe that, but it really couldn't sell. You may think the bad economy of late 2008 was all democrats fault. Again, that couldn't sell. Obama was left with many free passes and he is copying them. He will use them as long as he can; and in eight years progressives will still be blaming Bush for anything that is bad. Now his failed economic recovery package should seriously be hurting him, and republicans need to keep pounding him on it . But even that will take time.
Obama is much more masterful at politics than republicans ever were. Note how in spite of the fact that republicans are completely out of power, democrats have the 60 vote Senate majority, that Obama is still making ‘republicans’ the issue. They ‘just say no’. They ‘don't have a plan’ . They ‘want Obama to fail’. All of this SHOULD be irrelevant. But Dems are keeping republicans negatives high. My point is, you remember Bush keeping attaention on democrats in 2005 when dems crashed SS reform?? No! He was pretty lame and it didnt help us much.
Slowly, Hussein is starting to get tied to the rapid expansion of government. His poll numbers are not dropping because of the economy. They are dropping because of his expansion of government.
Polls show that people still blame the bad economy on Bush. But, give it time. It will catch up with him.
We need a Reagan that clearly defines the Democrat Party
I know that you believe that. I do not.
He’s still doing it because it still works. And it will continue to work, so get used to it.
We’re, what, 75 years after the beginning of the Great Depression and Herbert Hoover is still being blamed for everything that happened for the following decade.
You should have seen me in 2002 and 2003 arguing with republicans who told me they were scared Bush didnt know what he was doing. I really thought we had something in those days, that Bush would surprise everyone (positively) and make a fool of them.
After 2004 election I started to gain faith again, but those days are long gone. I was a fool like many others here were then.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.