Skip to comments.Duncan Hunter – Nov. 4, 2009: On the 2009 Elections, Global Warming Alarmists, and Ronald Reagan!
Posted on 11/04/2009 6:55:10 PM PST by pissant
Former Congressman Duncan L. Hunter was kind enough to interrupt his extended Idaho vacation once more to answer a few questions and put his two cents in on the issues of the day. He and Lynne had their daughter-in-law and grandkids join them in Idaho over the Halloween weekend. He also extended his vacation plans for another week or so. After 28 years in the US House, then writing a book, he certainly deserves to enjoy his family, the R&R, and the hunting and fishing opportunities this weeks long vacation has afforded him.
Hunter mentioned his son Duncan D. could not attend for Halloween, because he was in Afghanistan over the weekend on a fact finding trip. I let him know that their local newspaper, the North County Times (San Diego area), had two headlined stories about Duncan D.: one addressing his trip to Afghanistan and his clear statement that this war is winnable; and the other about his fervent opposition to ObamaCare.
Hunter mentioned that the North County Times was a good paper, and had usually treated him fairly over the years.
I then told Hunter that while researching the media archives during the race for the GOP 2008 nomination, I noticed a trend in his hometowns other big paper, the San Diego Union Tribune. That early in his career, they seemed to treat he and other conservatives with an even hand, but that sometime in the 1990s they started veering to the far left, and injecting that bias in their news reports.
Hunter then recited the history of the San Diego Union tribune, with Copley Press acquiring them, and Helen Copley running the paper, until her death in 2001. We pick up the interview at this point (due to recorder malfunction) .
DH: Even though she had Herb Kline, who was Nixons press secretary, as the manager of Copley Press, they started pulling in more liberal reporters and opinion writers. And her son, David Copley took it over. And its just kind of a mess right now. And you know all the newspapers are dropping like flies right now because they cant keep up with the electronic side.
So yeah, they changed it, and they hated border control. They hated the border fence - which was my baby, and they managed to cow all the other politicians in San Diego to not be in favor of the border fence.
AJM: Its funny though, how you kept getting re-elected by large margins.
DH: Yeah, thats a good statement on the irrelevancy of the printed media. On the other hand, listen, you talk to your friends (other politicians around the country) and you think your local press has given you a couple of shots, then they tell you look what my guys did to me, and you walk out of there saying God Bless Copley press (laughing). Its all relative, all a matter of comparison. And everyones got their written media, at least one or two, that give them a bad time.
But interestingly, North County (Times), was always good.
AJM: Yeah, they seem to cover the news without a lot of bias, a lot of opinion written into the article, except for the opinion of the people they are interviewing.
DH: Yeah, they are very good folks. I was impressed by them. And they actually did a lot of coverage of the Iraq War too. They had some people over there, and if you look up the national stuff on the Iraq War, there were some North County Times reporters, which is interesting.
AJM: I noticed that.
DH: They are obviously not a NY Times or other large paper with the logistical stretch to be able to do that kind of stuff.
So, yeah, Im still up here (in Idaho).
AJM: So do you have time for an interview now, or would you rather do it sometime later this week, or
DH: No, go right ahead. You got a little time. Im looking for a particular restaurant that Im going to take my wife to, so go ahead. Im just driving around the streets here looking for it.
AJM: OK, do you have a hands free device?
AJM: OK, I dont want to take responsibility for killing you (laughing).
DH: Great. Its a fancy world, and Im as artsy-crafty as the rest of them.
AJM: Well, first of all, you probably got a little bit of the news on the election. It went fairly well for the republicans this time, yesterday.
DH: One big disappointment, of course, was that the John McHugh seat was taken by a democrat (NY-23). That race was a good example of the fact that politics never comes wrapped in neat packages. The Republican nominee, as you know, ultimately endorsed the democrat after she pulled out and after the conservative Hoffman was endorsed by the party
AJM: Exactly, that was no surprise to those of us that thought she (Scozzafava) was a bad choice up front. He ended up losing 49 to 45%, with 6% going to the republican even though she dropped out. The other factor that helped sink Mr. Hoffman was the fact that the RNC and the NRCC had put up $900,000 to Scozzafava before she dropped out, and ran attack ads on him. So he was up against it. He hung in there but he lost. Kind of like you thought he might. I got the impression, you said last week that whenever a conservative is not aligned with the Republicans; the democrats are quote unquote licking their chops. Thats what you said.
DH: Well, with the split, the mathematics hurt you. It was inevitable that she would get some Republican votes that would have normally gone to the conservative. If we would have had a unified republican line there, we would have done better.
But I think that seat is available, that seat is a likely win back for the Republicans in the November election.
AJM: If indeed the GOP can get their house in order, and there is no guarantee that they are going to do that.
DH: Yeah, if we have a united ticket here this next time. The democrats will do everything he can to imbed themselves over the next six or seven months, but I think we have a better than 50/50 chance of taking that seat back.
AJM: Yeah, I think so too. Its not that far away either. But New Jersey was a success. That slob Corzine was shown the door, which is a very good thing. And in Virginia, the Republicans actually ran the table with a fairly conservative lineup, after going for Obama in 2008.
DH: Yes. Virginia righted itself with this election.
AJM: Exactly. Well, weve got some more troubling things coming down the pike here, besides health care. I just saw that Obama released a statement that hes going to double down on Cap and Trade, the global warming legislation. And thats our next battle. What do you suggest that the Republicans and conservatives do to combat this?
DH: I think the republicans have to appeal to the folks who will be most affected by the Cap and Trade, by the Obama Administration. Thats the people who carry lunch buckets and work for a living. That theres going to be a continuing exodus of high paying jobs as a result of this emphasis by the Obama Administration, which will make moving a production line to China or India become more attractive than ever to American employers.
So working the jobs angle I think that the Republicans should try to get the attention of the labor unions, and let them know that their life blood is going to be leaving this country as America becomes more unfriendly to business.
AJM: The republicans and the union leadership have seldom been on good terms, but that didnt stop a whole bunch of people, people I knew, who were union members from supporting Ronald Reagan back in the day.
DH: I remember the times, years ago, when George Meany was about the only guy in America who was willing to take a tough line against the Russians. His longshoremen, at one point, refused to load Russian ships during a foreign policy crisis. So unions and union leaders may become unlikely allies to the cause of keeping jobs.
And that has happened before. When no growth advocates tried to control the housing industry in California, business and labor had come together to offset that campaign. And theyve done so in several places, and have done so successfully.
Youve got to remember, those guys that are working folks are the same people that follow our flag in times of war, and protect this nation, pay taxes, and do lots of good things. I think that one thing the Republicans have to remember is that union workers, in many cases, reflect the best of this country.
AJM: That is true for the ones that actually do labor, but unions such as the SEIU, the service employees union, is frankly, not much more than a Marxist front.
DH: You have literally hundreds and hundreds of unions in this country, so you cant simply .thats like saying that Mr. Madoff ran off with all the money in a suitcase so capitalism is bad.
AJM: No, I agree, Im just saying that there are some unions that are completely in bed with the Democratic Party, no matter what. You can maybe still reach some members, but this SEIU group the ACORN folks, the vote fraud folks and theyre the kind of
DH: No doubt that you tend to have lefties, or left wingers tend to gravitate or attempt to embed themselves in labor unions. Thats true. On the other hand, you have a lot of great union members who are good Republicans. And I think the Republican Party has to remember that. For the Republican party to glom on to free trade on the basis that sending the jobs to Japan and Asia dissipates the power of the guys who they perceive were tearing down their signs during the election, that is union people, and to take a wholesale approach like that is a mistake.
AJM: I think so too. I worked at Boeing for nine years, and Id say a good 40% of them were republicans right off the bat, and another 20% were conservative democrats. It was not always reflected in their leaderships decisions; doesnt mean you cant talk over their leadership and attract large swaths of the lunch bucket guys.
AJM: On the other side of this argument with Cap and Trade is also the angle that James Inhofe has been taking, Senator Inhofe. And that is that the whole damn thing is a fraud with all the recent science showing that the last 10 years to be cooling, not heating. So hence we have the name climate change now instead of global warming. The whole scheme is a socialist construct to give the UN and supra-national entities power of taxation and regulation that they do not currently have.
DH: Well, I think there is a shortage of solid science on the part of the global warmers. The former head of the American Academy of Sciences, who passed away several years ago, was a staunch foe of this global warming concept. If you look for the hard science, youll see there is much less hard science than there are speeches promoting the concept of global warming. And it wouldnt be bad to have a major debate with the best advocates and scientists on both sides.
For a lot of people I think this has become a big cult. And I think a lot of the scientific community, which more than any other community, likes to be loved. So some of them have become very polarized, but there are a lot of them who are very objective, who dealt from the show me state, who havent seen the hard science that would compel the conclusions that weve seen talked about as if they are old, settled science.
AJM: It was interesting, because last Friday Glenn Beck had on his show a gentleman from England who is a leading skeptic. And he showed a graph, where all the computer models for global warming, from all these various universities and what have you, making their assumptions, all showing this trend line of heating the atmosphere over a period of years. So even though there were slight variations in the rate, he showed two pages of all these studies, or computer models, showing this warming. Then he showed the last 20 years of actual scientific data compiled by the head scientist at, I believe, MIT, and it showed the line going in the exact opposite direction from 20 years of meticulous data collection.
AJM: So the idea that Algore can dismiss this as some kind of settled science is really beyond the pale.
DH: Listen, do you remember the old Liberty Valence movie with Jimmy Stewart? And Jimmy Stewart finally told the reporter that actually the character who was played by John Wayne had shot Liberty Valence, and not him...
AJM: Yeah, yeah
DH: ...discarding the glory and the fame of having shot Liberty Valence. And the reporter closed up his notebook and walked away, and Stewart said arent you going to print that?, and the reporter said listen, when the legend conflicts with the facts, print the legend. (laughing)!
I think thats what a lot of the media are inclined to do right now.
But we need to have a national debate on the technical aspects; we need to have a scientific debate. Let people watch the science, and have an objective debate in lieu of the bombastics, and let the people make their own decisions based on this.
The people are being effectively walled off by the media. The people who object on a scientific basis to the notion of global warming are being shouted down. We need to have a debate on this.
AJM: I agree. And Senator Inhofe, I give him a lot of credit, hes been leading that fight, to have that very debate. Hes offered to debate Algore, on a televised
DH: Not Jim Inhofe debating. I like Jim Inhofe, hes a good guy. Nor Algore. We need to have a debate with the best scientists. For example, take the , exhume the papers from the guy who was, as I recall, the president of the American Academy of Sciences he passed away a couple of years ago. He was a very revered scientist in this country. He dismissed the notion of global warming.
AJM: Yeah, and hes not the only one. In fact, one of the leading French scientists, who was at the forefront for the global warmers, came out a year and a half ago and said you know, weve been wrong, its cooling now, not warming. So hes flipped sides, this guy from France, and he is probably the equivalent to this guy from the American Academy of Sciences. But they are immediately labeled heretics. Its a religion for some of this folks.
DH: Thats right. So lets have the debate. It would be good.
AJM: So lets see, global warming, the elections, what else was I going to ask .Oh, I was going to ask you about the book you said you were writing. Your book on Iraq and Afghanistan. Is that going to come out in a book form soon?
DH: Well, its not going to be on your local bookshelves in the next couple of weeks, but I will have it done in a couple of months.
AJM: Do you have a publisher lined up?
DH: We are working away.
AJM: Ok. Well youve got a lot of experience under your belt, unlike that guy who is sitting in the oval office, whos already got two biographies, I mean autobiographies. Are you ever considering writing your autobiography?
DH: No. I havent been considering that. Im trying to do something that is of some value to the country, other than entertainment (laughs). No, but were working away on this thing (war book) and it should be done in a month or so.
AJM: OK. Question. One of the folks that I correspond with, one of the guys who supported your campaign said, you know, that Hunter must have known Ronald Reagan pretty well, and he asked if you would give an anecdote about any experience you had with the Gipper. I know you knew him for a long time. But any humorous or interesting anecdotes youd care to share about the old guy?
DH: Well, I wasnt that close to Reagan, but I was one of the congressmen who came in with him in 80. I was part of several of his campaign appearances. I will tell you at one point a friend of mine was a speechwriter in the Reagan Whitehouse. He said congratulations, Reagan is going to be in your town campaigning for you in the next couple of weeks, and Im writing the speech. What would you like him to say about you?
So promptly, as a new congressman, I wrote several very strong, praise-filled provisions that I supplied my friend with, who was the speechwriter. And I was eagerly awaiting the President. And the President got up and went right down the line - when he was at Mission Valley in San Diego, with 20 thousand people there several weeks later went right down the line. He almost read it like I wrote it. And then he turns to me and said yes, and my good friend Duncan HOWARD one of the fine young stars in this new congress. (Laughing)
AJM: (Laughs) Did you spell your name wrong when you gave it to him?
DH: And my colleague, Bill Lowry, who was there on the podium with me we were always competing for press he had a heckuva laugh. And later, so did I.
AJM: I take it you still won the race
DH: Yeah. No, it was a great time. Anyway that was one of the fun times we had with the Gipper. Let me put it this way. He knew where the Soviet Union was and he knew what he wanted to do to them, but he didnt remember all the names of these nondescript congressmen.
AJM: Well I tell you though, what was interesting in the press, back in the mid 1980s, you led a delegation to Europe to convince the Europeans of a couple of things, regarding missile defenses as well as
DH: Yeah, missile defenses.
AJM: The fact that you were still relatively green, or young back then says something that Reagan would be happy with you leading that charge. I thought that was kind of impressive.
DH: Yes, that was a good campaign. That was when the Soviets had threatened Europe with SS-20 missiles, and theater missile defense, theater ballistic missile defense, was not banned by the ABM treaty. So we visited with the French, the British, and I believe, the Germans and we urged them to start development on theater ballistic missile defense systems. We also worked with the Israelis. And working on the Armed Services Committee, we were the driver on the development of the Arrow missile defense system, which Israel presently deploys.
AJM: And its funny. I read a piece published several years later, I believe published in the 1990s, when the debate re-ignited over missile defenses with Clinton basically trying to snuff them out. But I read a piece where Jack Kemp had credited you with being the leader on getting the thing passed through congress initially, back in the 80s.
DH: Well very good. Jack was a good guy. And Jack was a real leader on missile defense too.
AJM: I know he was. And for him to single out you was quite complimentary. I think he mentioned Henry Hyde as well. The three of you were the brass knucklers for Reagan in the House.
DH: Well there were a lot of great supporters of the Gipper in the House.
AJM: Well in conclusion today Ill let you go eat any inkling or any urge to perhaps compete for a certain Senate seat or governorship in the great state of California?
DH: No. Right now, my job is simply to be supporting cast. Ive won three awards for shuttling grand kids around and if my son asks me for any advice, Im always happy to give it to him. And its always worth what he pays for it (laughs). Youve got another Hunter up there in the Capital right now.
AJM: I know. Like I said, I keep an eye on that. Hes impressed me. Hes saying some good things. Its funny, because its come full circle, because hes saying a lot of the same things that you have previously said on the same subject matter. He didnt fall far from the tree.
DH: In that case, thats a reflection of his good judgment. (laughing).
AJM: So did you get any more hunting in this past week?
DH: No, Ive just been driving out and watching sunsets out here with my wife. But weve done a little bit of hunting here, a little bird hunting here in Idaho.
AJM: Did you end up catching a steelhead like you said you were going to?
DH: No, we were going to go up today, but its a long run to get up there. So we didnt go. We ended up not going, although the steelhead fishing is tremendous right now.
AJM: Thats kind of a shame.
DH: Theyve got what they call a forty rear run. They are doing real well.
AJM: Must be that global warming, because here in the Puget Sound, every year we get salmon, salmon coming back in different seasons, different years. Some of the King salmon go out and come back after four years, the sockeye, etc. But the only fish that does not have a supplemental system of hatcheries to try to increase the stocks is the Pink salmon. The Pink salmon, they dont stock them, they dont hatch them. They are native, all of them. And we had a record run this year of pink salmon. So Im wondering if some of these hatcheries are
DH: More proof that big government does not work!
So Ill let you go now. Well hook up next week. What Id like to do when you are back in San Diego, and more or less settled in one spot, Id like to set up that conference call system, because there a couple of other folks that would really like to get in a question.
DH: Be happy to do it, absolutely.
More from DH PING.
Envision a better America had we not missed our chance.
I’m still ticked off that more people didn’t support Duncan Hunter.
It hurts to even think about it. LOL
I wish he would do a book and start taking more high-profile speaking engagements so he can get the word out and get more public face time so he will be better known through out America for the next presidential run.
I’m with you on that, bro.
That’s part of the plan.
Duncan Hunter October 27, 2009: On ObamaCare, RomneyCare and Americans!
Duncan Hunter 10/9/09 Interview. Bomb Iran, confront China, and work to defeat Socialism!
Perhaps if he had not entrenched himself as a member of congress for almost three decades, things may have been different.
Not sure what the mystery is.
Using your formula, explain McCain.
From where I sit Hunter just wasn’t one of the AIG candidates who sat at the top of the donor list.
I just adore that man!
U.S. Congressman Duncan Hunter with his son, Capt. Duncan D. Hunter. Hunter was a Republican candidate for President. Capt. Hunter has served three tours of duty in the Middle East as a forward observor with the US Marine Corps.
“Im still ticked off that more people didnt support Duncan Hunter.”
I think the fault lies with the RINOs in charge of the Republican Party not with the people. I’m not sure how much more we could have done to advance his cause.
Here’s to having to make the delicious choice between Sarah Palin and Duncan Hunter at the top of the Republican ticket in 2012.
Sad to say but America doesn’t deserve a guy this great.
Well, it would be refreshing to argue over which conservative is more conservative or better, as opposed to arguing over which RINO is least offensive.
Make lots of peperoni sticks and jerky instead
Howdy dahlin. How is ya?
You rule pissant.
I read it all, and thanks.
Hi, Cutie. Do I owe you some Pinor Noir?
I think I do...
Pairs great with Salmon but with deer... we’re looking at a severe Cabernet.
Did we bet on something? If not, you can still send me some Pinot.
I’m not much into the etiquette thing. I can drink Pinot or Cab without any food or reason, though I usually prefer a nice hoppy beer!
Not I, but the guy being interviewed sure does.
Great. He seems to be enjoying the vacation, but also itching to start throwing some elbows around very soon
Well I think it’s incredible that you have access to the guy, and he agreed to let you post the interviews on here.
What is Duncan Hunter Sr.’s future political plans, if he seriously has any? Will he, seriously and possibly, either join: some political PAC, some political special interest group, some other political group, create some other group, or do none of the above and officially retire from the world of politics?
Well, it’s like this. When others worry about being seen as “too conservative” on an issue, Hunter revels in it.
When republicans dismiss electricians, and machinists and laborers because they are in a Union, Hunter listens to their concerns.
When others shy away from “controversial” issues like Abortion, and deporting illegal aliens because its not smart politics, Hunter double downs and explains in no uncertain terms why he believes what he believes.
When the entire GOP establishment went hiding behind their wives’ skirts when the MSM lambasted Marine General Peter Pace for daring to call homosexuality “immoral”, Hunter demanded and got the USA Today to print his scathing rebuttal to the PC police in their paper.
When Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, and John Mccain raced to the microphones ala Chuckie Schumer to condemn Ann Coulter over her John Edwards/fag joke she made at CPAC, Hunter just laughed at the joke instead.
When John McCain and a group of “leading republicans” were demanding an end to “torture” and that Bush close Guantanamo, Hunter was the one who shoved them back under their rocks.
When big money interests lobbied hard and the Repubbies decided to work with Slick Willie to open the floodgates of lopsided trade with the commie bastards in China, it was Hunter who fought it almost singlehandedly, pointing out then what has since transpired.
When Hunter was asked to come onto FreeRepublic for a live interview, he was informed how “radical” the MSM and even the ‘conservative’ media thought this site was. He just didn’t care.
So yeah, he’s cut from a different cloth then the politically correct capons in DC.
He’s leaving his options open. Right now, he’s just enjoying his first long vacation in years.
Thanks for the ping. B4DH
Kevmo checking in BUMP
That’s all of why I believe Duncan Hunter to be one of the best chances we have of restoring this country without having to do what our Founding Fathers did.
Hunter, Demint, King, Pence, and depending on a few things, maybe Palin.
And that’s just elected officials.
“Well, it would be refreshing to argue over which conservative is more conservative or better, as opposed to arguing over which RINO is least offensive.”
An ideal scenario would be Duncan Hunter as President ,with Sarah Palin in the wings as VP.
Potentially 16 years of pro-American, patriotic, traditional values, small government conservative heaven.
The redoubtable Duncan Hunter as CIC. The stuff that dreams are made of.
Another very interesting thread, and I like Hunter’s analysis on the Doug Hoffman race.
I was disappointed about Hoffman, but he did a lot of good, and showed the liberal Republican party bosses in the 23rd district that we ain’t gonna take it anymore.
NICE website, too.
Great man, great patriot!
Is it possible that you have asked Hunter about Obama’s eligibility, didn’t get the response you wanted, and deleted it from your interview transcripts?
“DH: Yeah, RomneyCare (laughs). One problem with that is that you end up with these insurance companies that are basically the captives of State government. And they hold them very jealously and consider them part of their own political domain. Those politicians have, those state controlled insurance companies attend their fundraisers and they make the rules that govern those particular insurance companies. And most state legislatures that Im aware of would be very much adverse to allowing people to buy their insurance across state lines. And at one time we saw that the same health package, from one of our reports, that a health package that costs in excess of $700 per month in Massachusetts, that the same coverage could be purchased in Missouri for little more that $200. “
There you are. Do you want to pay 700.00 in Mass. or 200.00 in Missouri? The GOVERNMENT says you can’t cross state lines. The government is the problem, not the solution!
I can only imagine the thrill of fishing and hunting in Idaho with Duncan Hunter!
Thanks for the ping, pissant.
Thanks for the ping.
IMO I would say that the fire in the belly is gone. But being the patriot he is, it may come alive once more if the trumpet sounds.
He is still one of the most important voices in our nation. I sincerely hope that his influence will be present in the discussion even if his name is not on a ballot...
This is great. The Randy Larsen wing of FR just picked up another member. ROFL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.