Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/18/2009 2:11:57 PM PST by MaxCUA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MaxCUA

Newsweak did not run photos like this one of the man-child president on the cover.

But these tactics are OLD OLD OLD in the media. Frank Capra addressed such media manipulation in "Mr. Smith Goes To Washington" when Mr. Smith is likewise made to appear foolish and wrong for Washington.

2 posted on 11/18/2009 2:17:57 PM PST by a fool in paradise (I refuse to "reduce my carbon footprint" all while Lenin remains in an airconditioned shrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MaxCUA

contact brian adams photography
brian@baphotos.com
907.250.2029
Getty Images


4 posted on 11/18/2009 2:25:32 PM PST by jessduntno (Graham: "What would we do with Bin Laden?" Holder: "I dunno..." We are so screwed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MaxCUA
while Adams clearly violated his agreement, it's not clear he did so without Runner's World's consent

Oh yes it is clear - Runner's World came out yesterday and said it was done w/out their knowledge and consent!
5 posted on 11/18/2009 2:33:08 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MaxCUA
“But a spokeswoman for Runner's World confirms that Adams’s contract contained a clause stipulating that his photos of Palin would be under embargo for a period of one year following publication — meaning until August 2010.”

That was the contract between Runner's World and the Photographer which means RW could sue the photog for illegal distribution but maybe Palin doesn't have standing?

More importantly is the contract between Palin and RW regarding the disposition of any photos they took to accompany the interview.

For some reason, Palin’s camp is strangely silent on the issue other than to accuse Newsweek of being sexist. How come they didn't concurrently announce that the photos were used in contradiction of the terms of her contract with RW?
Contracts of this nature routinely contain a clause that any photos taken in conjunction with an interview be used for that purpose only and within a restricted time frame and always, at least with a celebrity like Palin, that any further use cannot be made without expressed written consent.

So I'm very confused about this. Did Palin’s contract with RW contain the usual and obligatory clauses that allowed her some control over their later distribution?

If not, then why is she going down this “sexist” route? Did Newsweek conduct a photo shoot with Palin in order to secure pics they could use for the article and cover? If not, what photos did Palin expect them to use?

7 posted on 11/18/2009 2:45:25 PM PST by Bob J ("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one strikes at its root.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MaxCUA

What to do about Sarah, indeed !


9 posted on 11/18/2009 2:54:19 PM PST by Reagan69 (The only thing SHOVEL-READY since BO's stimulus has been MICHAEL JACKSON (tammy bruce))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson