Skip to comments.Another source, Kenyan Historian states Obama is a Kenyan citizen
Posted on 11/27/2009 12:02:11 PM PST by syc1959
Here is an interesting article and audio.
Otunnu on Luo Tribe Member Being Elected President, Oct. 25, 2008
Olara Otunnu (Harvard Law, 1978) relating the remark of Kenyan historian Ali Mazrui on the oddity that a member of Kenyas Luo tribe (Barack Obama, a Kenyan citizen and Luo tribe member from birth) may become president of the United States before a Luo tribe member becomes president of Kenya. Town Hall Forum: An Examination of Race, Age, Gender & Religion in the 2008 Election, Harvard Law School Reunions, Oct. 25, 2008, 9:15 a.m. (Austin Hall, 1st Floor, West), at 60:17 mark.
Notice that it is a Kenyan historian that states Barack Obama is a Kenyan citizen and Luo tribe member from BIRTH!
US Natural Born citizen = US Citizen + US Allegiance + US Jurisdiction
Obama is a British subject, allegiance to the British Crown, under the British Nationality Act of 1948
Remember this was done BEFORE the election, but after numerous requests during the primary for Barack Hussein Obama to PROVE his eligibility per the United States Constitution. After the election the Kenyan Parliment stated the following;
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OFFICIAL REPORT
Wednesday, 5th November, 2008
The House met at 9.00 a.m.
Dr. Khalwale: On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. You have heard none other than the Leader of Government Business acknowledge that because of Obamas win in the United States of America (USA), the House is crippled.
Could we allow him to move a Motion for Adjournment so that we could also continue the celebrations of having a Kenyan ruling the USA? I humbly request! *****[note - "having a Kenyan ruling the USA"!]
Read the rest and more here: http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/kenyan-historian-ali-mazrui-states-obama-kenyan-citizen/
(Excerpt) Read more at nobarack08.wordpress.com ...
|> Do you have even a single link where Cheney or Roberts
> had anything to say?
>> Yes. Here is the video of then Vice President Cheney
Is that the same video where Cheney did not call for any objection
3 USC Sec. 15 01/03/2007
"Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any. "...
Is that the same video where Chief Justice Roberts "misquoted" the Oath of Office on Jan 20 which Obama repeated OR is it a long-lost video of the SECOND Oath of Office re-administered on Jan 21, which was non-public (and performed without the Bible as has been tradition since George Washington) ...
Please clarify ...
Again with the name calling. Ah well, I understand that this is all you’ve got.
So let’s be honest. The issues you mention have all been addressed. You don’t accept the answers and choose to go grasping at straws looking for something else, anything else. That’s fine.
But to throw out insults because you refuse to think clearly?
That’s really just kind of sad.
I’m sorry, I am not willing to buy into the theory that Dick Cheney intentionally failed to call for objections and that not a single Republican member of the House and Senate was prohibited from objecting to the certification of the election.
And, I do not believe that Chief Justice Roberts intentionally botched the Oath of Office. If Roberts had not wanted to deliver the Oath of Office, he could have refused to do the honors.
Obama has always claimed he was born in Hawaii.
Therefore Obama denied he was born in Kenya or anywhere other than Hawaii.
What are the odds that this post of yours is gonna get pulled to?
Think you can throw one up without insults, profanity or other general crude language?
Knock off the profanity and vulgarities.
While I don't like what Pres_ _ent Obama stands for, does, and probably thinks, if a poster asserts that something exists it is not out of line to ask for proof.
Pres_ _ent Obama should show his long form birth certificate, open his college records, and do anything else to dispel the thoughts that he is not qualified for the job.
But to assert that he has said, himself, that he is Kenyan born and offer no proof, audibly or in print, and then belittle someone for asking for the proof, should not be a thing that FReepers applaud.
| > Im sorry, I am not willing to buy into the theory ...
You don't have to "buy into" anything!
It is a FACT that NO objections were called for on Obama's Electoral votes by the U.S. Senate on Jan. 8, in accordance with REQUIREMENTS set forth in 3 USC 15 - Sec. 15:
You might say, "Oh, that just a technicality."
But then again, so is the whole "Natural Born Citizen" issue merely a "technicality" in the eyes of some who don't hold it as a Constitutional requirement.
Why else did Obama do a SECOND Oath of Office on Jan. 21? "Constitutional Experts" were concerned that other foreign governments and leaders might not acknowledge Obama's legitimacy, a/k/a, a "technicality."
Child molesters and murders are let off on weaker "technicalities" than this ...
There may not be smoking gun “proof” that Obama was born in Kenya besides the fact that he is not a natural born citizen, BUT the preponderance of evidence that says he was born in Kenya certainly warrants an official investigation. Furthermore, trumandogz is a BC troll as I can attest to from the thousands of BC threads he has been on since this issue became an issue on June 12th, 2008.
Incorrect. In fact he NEVER corrected the NUMEROUS 2004 news articles stating he was born in Kenya.
Thanks, BP. Your research and examples
are flawless, as always.
Also, you never answered even one of my questions. Why is Obama spending millions of dollars to prevent a $15 form from being released? Why did the DNC submit one form declaring Obama’s constitutional eligibility to be their candidate for president and then REVISE the form and release a form that OMITTED that inconvenient little detail?
It still stands though that BHO never claimed to have been born anywhere but Hawaii. Even when he was trying to cultivate a black identity by attending a church that pushed racism and liberation theology.
His mother never claimed that he was ever born anywhere other than Hawaii as well.
“Why is Obama spending millions of dollars to prevent a $15 form from being released?”
He isn't. You're taking the amount his campaign has paid Perkins & Cole for a very wide variety of legal services and pretending it was all going to “hide the birth certificate”.
“Why did the DNC submit one form declaring Obamas constitutional eligibility to be their candidate for president and then REVISE the form and release a form that OMITTED that inconvenient little detail?”
I have no idea. Has anyone bothered to ask them?
Candor, I agree to a degree. My degree is in the negligence of those “involved”, NOT, The Constitution. What’s amazingly sad for me to observe is that even full blooded American’s cannot agree on what the Constitution means. It seems abundantly clear to me but to others who want to divide it “another way” it seems that they have an excuse too. I am personally not convinced that the Constitution of the United States is open to any other interpretation than WHAT IT SAYS!! That, is my opinion. I’m persuaded that Obama is a fraud but if the country is not, then I guess the chips will fall where they fall. Doesn’t look pretty to me however. I am not even convinced that elections will EVER be the same. CO
Sorry, I meant my comment to Candor7 to go to you. CO
I'm sure they have, and I am equally sure that the DNC gave some lame excuse that no one except for the Obama worshipers believe.
I’ll tell you what you are doing - YOU are turning everything on it’s head. WHY should the American people have to vet a President? WHY should not the one seeking the office be WILLING let alone spend millions of dollars fighting to keep his entire history a secret be let off the hook? Upside down to me. ANYONE but ANYONE who is legitimate would gladly produce their documentation. McCain had to. Bill Clinton had to producce his medical records and others I’m sure as everyone knows he was born in Arkansas. The Bushes were seriously vetted even down to a 30 year old DUI for GW. For Obageddon - NADA, ZILCH, NOTHING. The questions still remains - WHY? and more importantly, WHY fight it? Stinks period. Carry on. CO
Do you actually believe that Obama isn't directing them to make sure the BC stays hidden? A genuine Hawaiian birth certificate with a doctor's signature would make all of the law suits go away. If Perkins and Cole are fighting to prevent the release without Obama's knowledge and spending millions of dollars to do it, they are guilty of fraud. Do you believe that? Or do you believe that they are acting at the behest of the president and his minions?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.