Posted on 12/11/2009 9:31:20 PM PST by BorderRaven
See http://www.scribd.com/doc/24001567/Obama-BC-GMom
"In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or midwife, then all that was required was that one of the parents send in a birth certificate to be filed. The birth certificate could be filed by mail. There appears to have been no requirement for the parent to actually physically appear before “the local registrar of the district.” It would have been very easy for a relative to forge an absent parent’s signature to a form and mail it in. In addition, if a claim was made that “neither parent of the newborn child whose birth is unattended as above provided is able to prepare a birth certificate, the local registrar shall secure the necessary information from any person having knowledge of the birth and prepare and file the certificate.” (Section 57-8&9) I asked the Dept of Health what they currently ask for (in 2008) to back up a parent’s claim that a child was born in Hawaii. I was told that all they required was a proof of residence in Hawaii (e.g. a driver’s license [We know from interviews with her friends on Mercer Island in Washington State that Ann Dunham had acquired a driver’s license by the summer of 1961 at the age of 17] or telephone bill) and pre-natal (statement or report that a woman was pregnant) and post-natal (statement or report that a new-born baby has been examined) certification by a physician. On further enquiry, the employee that I spoke to informed me that the pre-natal and post-natal certifications had probably not been in force in the ‘60s." ... http://www.westernjournalism.com/?page_id=2697
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournalism.com ...
“FREE THE LONG FORM!”
Ping instead of Lucy!
I am beginning to wonder if suing Factcheck.org might be a better idea. Forcing them to prove that “FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate.”
Sadly the judiciary in this country is corrupt along with most of the legistaltive and exec branches.
“There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama’s official birth certificate. State law (Hawai‘i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record.”
These are the words of the head of the Hawaii Dept of Vital Statistics in 2008.
Every citizen of the United States, every voter in a presidential election, has a “tangible interest in the vital record.” Obama did not run to be governor of Hawaii, nor to hold any other office within that state. He ran for an office that has to do with every citizen of every state.
For the state of Hawaii to withhold that particular document from the secretaries of the several states and/or the election officials who determine who may or may not be placed on ballots is wrong as it could result in subversion of the federal Constitution. This should be ruled on by the United States Supreme Court, since this is an interstate question, not merely a Hawaii state question.
We know from interviews with her friends on Mercer Island in Washington State that Ann Dunham had acquired a driver’s license by the summer of 1961 at the age of 17...
I think I have read every story and article attributed to friends and classmates, and not once did I run across information that she had a driver's licence...
Now riddle me this: Every 'record' I have seen shows her birthdate as late November 1942. If she acquired a driver's licence when she was 17, wouldn't mean she did so in 1959?
338.17 is new definition from only a few years ago. 1982 IRCC.
This is another fake.
But the offset typed line HRS 338-17.8 indicates that it was later added to the birth certificate to reflect the current law.
This natural birth business of Obama’s just STINKS!!!
I thought most women went to hospital back then?
Most women went to the hospital, but certainly not all. Obama’s mother was a hippie, for Pete’s sake, having a home birth would not have been surprising.
When will someone in the US Government realize this?
I don't get it.
But the official Obama line is that he was born at Kapiolani Hospital. Sorta rules out being born in a Hawaiian shack.
It can't be real.
It hasn't been stamped by the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit.
Cheers!
Since you’ve kept abreast of every story and I have not, I will only add my thoughts to this birth certificate debate.
I suspect he was probably born in Hawaii, but I have no proof, just like I have no proof he graduated from Columbia or proof that he was the president of Harvard’s Law review, or that he’s brilliant.
I know nothing about this son of a Muslim-Kenyan Communist alcoholic, who has in his possession our nation’s top secrets and the suitcase that could blow-up the free world.
IT SEEMS TO ME THAT HE IS NOT ENTITLED TO ANY RIGHT TO PRIVACY!
His entire life should be an open book for every US citizen to see and examine.
He released one page from his personal physician that was permitted to serve as his medical records.
He has never released his college transcripts or even one essay.
All we have are his two “novels” about his life, that he claims to have written.
The gleeful news media just shoveled him into office and to date, that same news media are content to stonewall all investigations into his past.
I could go on about mysteries of his Indonesia years -— the names changes and adoption -— his re-entry into the US -— what passport was used to travel to Japan with his mother etc.
We have a complete unknown in the White House and we deserve answers to every question.
ANSWERS TO EVERY QUESTION.
Boom shaka laka !
My guess is that there is no actual long form birth certificate; and the *source* document is a signed statement by the mother.
Like you said, that would destroy the narrative regarding Kopiolani Hospital. And prove that Barry's been lying to the country all along.
The second image has disappeared from the link, did anyone get a copy?
Indeed we do. You would think more people in this country would share the same common sense view but we are evidently living in a Twilight Zone.
Good post
They still do. In the U.S. it is very unusual to have a home birth.
In order to believe one of the many versions that Obama has given over the years, you would have to believe that inspite of the fact that his mother was on welfare, his grandparents had no influence or wealth, he had poor grades, he took drugs he was able to get a full scholarship to Occidental and then to both Columbia and Harvard without the help of anyone?
In order to get a full scholarship to any of the universities he would have had to meet some criteria other than being half black. I think he applied as a foreigner at a time when scholarships were being given to students from Africa on a regular basis. Those were the only scholarships that would not have been based on grades. Even if he had a benefactor who was willing to pay his full way, his grades may not have allowed him to be accepted at that college without help. (IE Frank Marshall asking one of the University professors who was part of the underground.)
Great post!
Being a ghoster, not a birther, I do believe that having a ghost for a president is a great insult to all Americans.
We need to see ALL 0b0z0’s records, especially education records that will reveal if he ever graduated. They will also reveal the brilliant One’s negative GPAs that go with his negative IQ!
Education records may very well reveal his foreign student status, Affirmative Action help and WHO paid for his “education.”
I believe this will be enough to throw him out, pop his long-form BC out of the vault if he wants to put up a defense or just resign and leave us alone.
I doubt any of this will happen unless the MSM picks up steam and expand the 0b0z0 jokes and pokes.
I can dream, can’t I?
Thanks for the ping, Candor7.
I forgot to copy you on #27.
I **love** that expression! “Ghoster”! Yeah! You are absolutely right. Having a ghost for president is an insult.
An honest man would be **HONORED**to fully and promptly prove to any citizen in every way possible that they were a natural born citizen and eligible to occupy the office of president.
That Obama refuses to do this is an **INSULT** to all Americans.
By the way, I have a new tagline!
I agree with much of your post.
0bama probably was born in Hawaii but is not a natural born citizen due to his father’s status as a British subject.
Additionally, it’s my hunch that 0bama took advantage of his adopted Indonesian citizenship to gain entry and scholarships at Occidental, Columbia, Harvard, and perhaps even Punahou.
He may even studied overseas using his Indonesian/Kenyan/? passport. Russian intelligence have his passport information, as did the late key witness, Lieutenant Quarles Harris Jr.
http://209.157.64.200/focus/news/2365625/posts?page=277
http://blog.kievukraine.info/2005/08/obama-part-of-group-locked-up-at.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2232588/posts?page=104
/justmy$.02
Thank you for your post.
Good tagline. You inspired me to change mine!
I ain’t no have-gun-will-travel Chuck Connors! LOL
Including true journalism that passed away in 2008!!!
But 52% of cool aid Soetoro drinkers will say NO!!!
And Ann Coulter too!!!
There is still the unsolved Lucas Smith’s Kenyan “official” B.C.???
“normally” you have a few “After-Birthers” who will give you eloquent and “true” answers to your questions!!!
Now we can add a new title: “Birther-Ghosters”!!!
In the 1800 until the around the 1940's it wasn't to unusual.
I think the Lucas Smith BC is enforced by the document signed by his grandmother, thus leaning toward a Kenya birth and a British or Kenya nationality.
I agree with you, and I also believe that stringent laws about all of your points should be enacted. People who hold NATIONAL office should not expect much privacy, much less all the “privacy” BHO has gotten away with.
http://tw0.us/5fm
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Letter Re Obama Eligibility to Texas Secretary of State
The fact that the Hawaii Revised Statutes permit anyone with a "direct and tangible interest" in the birth certificate ought to mean that anyone can obtain Mr. Obama's birth certificate since we all have a direct and tangible interest in it.
Open Letter to Mr. George Soros and Open Society Institute Re Obama Birth Certificate
Mr. George Soros
Open Society Institute
400 West 59th Street
New York, NY 10019, U.S.A.
Dear Mr. Soros:
You have made a point of claiming that you believe in an “open society” and you have assertively backed Barack Obama’s candidacy. At present, the State of Hawaii has violated the requirements of its Open Records Law and § 338-18 of its statute concerning birth records by refusing to provide Barack Obama’s birth certificate to every American. Yet, every American has a direct and tangible interest in seeing this information first hand. I have written to Mr. Obama and asked that he open this information to society and he has not responded. Instead, Obama supporters have offered a fraudulent birth certificate via a Web site. I am curious as to how Mr. Obama’s willingness to engage in manipulative secrecy jibes with your belief in an open society. Do you continue to support Mr. Obama’s candidacy despite his indifference to an open society?
Some have argued that Mr. Obama’s birth certificate is not problematic and that he is merely manipulating public opinion, intending to reveal favorable information at an opportune time. If so, is this sort of political manipulation the foundation of your interpretation of what the term “open society” ought to mean?
Sincerely,
Mitchell Langbert
July 14, 2008
Dr. Chiyome L. Fukino, MD
Director of Public Health
State of Hawaii Department of Health
Honolulu, Hawaii 98601-3378
Dear Ms. Fukino:
“The following persons shall be considered to have a direct and tangible interest in a public health statistics record:...”
If the authors of the statute had aimed to limit access to the list, they could have stated that the list is exhaustive and exclusive in the statute, but the statute DOES NOT so state. Hence, Ms. Okubo is incorrect in claiming that the people who have “direct and tangible interest” are defined in the statute. The statute merely states those who should be construed to have such an interest (a safe harbor list) but DOES NOT STATE that others may not also have “direct and tangible interest”.
Since all Americans have a “direct and tangible interest” in knowing what Mr. Obama’s birth certificate states, you and the Department of Health are violating § 338-18 by refusing to provide a certified copy of the birth certificate to any American.
Uhm, no. But I am one of the Freepers that pointed it out.
Hang on.
Can’t find it but, you can ping BP2 and he might remember.
Ghoster! I like that. If you ever see Obama, be sure to say “BOO.”
He is shrouded in mystery and that is so wrong on every front. It’s one thing for a celebrity to manufacture a past, but it’s quite another for a public office holder, particularly the holder of our nation’s highest office.
This man has never been vetted, and yet the US Senate portends to vet his cabinet. For all the scrutiny Obama has received, he might as well be one of his czars, or the head czar. Gee, I think I’m onto something here. Czar Hussein!
maggief, (I almost typed fluffs)lol
I’m missing something: his hippie, left-wing radical mother was a US citizen, so what bearing does his father’s British status have on Barack’s eligibility?
I like your thinking with regard to your hunch that he used his adopted Sotero/Indonesia to gain status and entry into US and the universites and that lead to some uncomfortable revelations.
I followed your links:
Yes, the missing Columbia years, wherein nobody remembers him and who the hell paid his tuition. I recall reading several articles that speculated a variety of people and far left sources.
The Russian hold on him and Lugar is most interesting and the untimely death of Lt. Harris raises even more suspicions.
I can summarize what scares and irks the hell out of me: I know the man is anti-American. It oozes from him. He can’t hide it, no matter what the teleprompter tells him to say. Yet, here he is, the president of the United States and our military’s Commander in Chief, not only privy to everything that keeps our coutry and the free world safe, but also in charge of ordering our military into action and in charge of our nuclear weapons.
You know how every decade or so, our FBI or CIA discover a traitor or a network of traitors within its ranks and we subsequently learn that years of intelligence and secret weaponry have been compromised? Well, think about the complete damage that can be done were the top man anti-American.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.