Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christmas at the U.S. Post Office - Snowmen or Mary, take your pick
Examiner.com ^ | Dec. 23, 2009 | RĂ©ne Girard

Posted on 12/23/2009 12:38:18 PM PST by RGirard

The U.S. Post Office is especially busy during the Christmas season. The lines are longer than usual as people wait patiently to send carefully packaged gifts to loved ones across the country, as well as Christmas cards to those both near and far. Business is good, albeit frantic, and once you get up to the counter you have a choice when it comes to stamps: Snowmen or Mary, take your pick.

The question may be phrased differently depending on which location you visit, but these were my choices when I asked for Holiday Stamps ...

I later discovered that the U.S. Postal service also offers Hanukkah stamps, Kwanzaa stamps, Eid stamps and a holiday pack of 2008 42-cent nutcracker stamps + 2-cent Nava-ho-ho-ho necklace stamps ...

Also, I'm a Protestant, so my natural instinct is to resist anything Catholic. I have had some Catholic friends ... so it's not the people as much as the institution I reject which exalts Mary and the Pope as if they were God himself. If my choice had been "Snowman or Jesus?" I would have of course said "Jesus!" ...

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: christmas; jesus; postoffice; stamps
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: RGirard
Thank you!

For the well-being and redemption of my two sons, Ben (he's a Lance Corporal, USMC, at Al-Asad, Iraq) and Vanya (he's a 10th grader.)

You could throw in a good word for me, too.

:o)

41 posted on 12/23/2009 5:12:27 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("In Christ we who are many form one body, and each member belongs to all the others." Romans 12:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

“First of all I was trying to get at the fact that nowhere in Scripture does it say that Scripture is the only source of Truth. The Church has always accepted Sacred Tradition as the other component of Divine Revelation.”

But it does in 1 Timothy and you can see the mess that accepting “sacred tradition” made in the Jewish religion.


42 posted on 12/23/2009 5:15:55 PM PST by swmobuffalo ("We didn't seek the approval of Code Pink and MoveOn.org before deciding what to do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: swmobuffalo

Nice mis-interpretation and stretch.

Sacred Tradition has nothing to do with Judaism. It has to do with the Revelation of Jesus Christ and the Apostles he appointed.


43 posted on 12/23/2009 5:44:24 PM PST by big'ol_freeper ("Anyone pushing Romney must love socialism...Piss on Romney and his enablers!!" ~ Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RGirard
I am confident that Martin Luther, the Catholic priest, was correct in protesting the corruption of the church.

Can you determine a time in history when this corruption is supposed to have occurred?

44 posted on 12/23/2009 6:04:52 PM PST by Kells
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Kells

Yes in Luthers time the Church was very corrupt. Selling indulgences to get time off in hell was one example.The Medici Popes were terrible people in some cases.The church is run by men and men can always be corrupt , even Popes. Free will .


45 posted on 12/23/2009 6:17:20 PM PST by sonic109 (and...what are we going to do about it ? NOTHING ?..so shut up and take it !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Kells

The Church has had individually corrupt leaders and members such as Judas, but this did not corrupt “the Church” by altering Church doctrine. Luther claimed that Catholic Church doctrine had become corrupt but never could specify when this corruption was supposed to have taken place.


46 posted on 12/23/2009 6:25:37 PM PST by Kells
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RGirard

The Church has had individually corrupt leaders and members such as Judas, but this did not corrupt “the Church” by altering Church doctrine. Luther claimed that Catholic Church doctrine had become corrupt but never could specify when this corruption was supposed to have taken place.


47 posted on 12/23/2009 6:26:11 PM PST by Kells
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

Personally I believe Jesus was born April 6th


48 posted on 12/23/2009 7:09:56 PM PST by dixjea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RGirard
read the article and maybe you’ll have a better understanding - unless you just like to call people names

Honestly, I just like to call people names!

49 posted on 12/23/2009 7:13:37 PM PST by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kells

Corruption takes place over time ... just like with our Government, there may be particular dates in time that historians can refer to because of significant events, but when did our Government become corrupt? Impossible to say


50 posted on 12/23/2009 10:10:24 PM PST by RGirard ("If you read just one book this year ... " by An American Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RGirard
Corruption takes place over time ... just like with our Government, there may be particular dates in time that historians can refer to because of significant events, but when did our Government become corrupt? Impossible to say

That is not a good analogy because our government was founded mostly by deists. In many ways our government was corrupted from the beginning when Hamilton established the National Bank. The Early Church was founded by Christ and the Holy Spirit guiding His Apostles. If the original Church doctrine was divinely inspired to be true, then at what historical council or papal proclamation was Church doctrine demonstrated to have become something less than true?

51 posted on 12/24/2009 5:00:10 AM PST by Kells
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Kells

By “Church” do you mean the Catholic church, or the true church which is the body of believers?


52 posted on 12/24/2009 11:38:15 AM PST by RGirard ("If you read just one book this year ... " by An American Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RGirard

“do you mean the Catholic church, or the true church which is the body of believers?”
________

Like Jimmy Carter, Al Gore, the Clintons, snake handlers and televangelists for example!


53 posted on 12/24/2009 11:42:41 AM PST by awake-n-angry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RGirard
By “Church” do you mean the Catholic church, or the true church which is the body of believers?

By "Early Church doctrine," I mean that doctrine inspired by the Holy Spirit, preached by the Apostles, and accepted by the body of believers. Was there ever a break between inspired Early Church doctrine and traditional Catholic Church doctrine?

54 posted on 12/24/2009 12:24:33 PM PST by Kells
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson