Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SatinDoll
Generally speaking, a party tries to exhaust all other alternatives in resolving a dispute before committing to a lawsuit. In this case, if the governess says NO, the parties requesting the documentation can hopefully publicize her refusal and the fact that such refusal is in defiance of her own state attorneys’ legal device. The governess is a well known public figure and getting her involved figures to increase the public exposure of the issue. That's especially true if she's running for the US Senate, which I've heard she may plan to do.
26 posted on 12/25/2009 12:17:12 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: justiceseeker93

All she has to do is order Departments and the State Attorney General to enforce Hawaii’s own laws and statutes, period. That hasn’t been done, as far as I know and I’ve was reading the results of Leo’s and Miss Tickly’s efforts along those lines. Anyway, Rahm Emmanuel has publicly stated that “Hawaii is ours”. It seems to me that the ‘governess’ hasn’t had to say NO; her lack of action on this issue is expressive enough.


27 posted on 12/25/2009 2:26:54 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson