I have been following this silly stuff. Just like I follow the Sarah Palin worship, Ron Paul foolishness and Duncan Hunter for President joke-a-thon.
The point remains. There is simply no evidence or statements that contradict that Obama was born in Hawaii. There is a document released by the state of Hawaii, confirmed by the Republican Governor of the state plus a hospital that Obama says and the White House says he was born in that has not been contradicted by that hospital. Plus birth announcements in the local newspapers at the time.
I really don’t see why we have to continue with this stupidity when there are so many other issues that we can fight this guy on.
But would you admit that there might be evidence in all the 'records' that Obama has directed to be 'sealed'? Evidence that could contradict more than just his birthplace?
There is a document released by the state of Hawaii, confirmed by the Republican Governor of the state plus a hospital that Obama says and the White House says he was born in that has not been contradicted by that hospital.
Then you just don't understand the implications of a Presidential Order to keep certain information sealed. IF the BC contained info that would counter the President's claims, they are not 'at liberty' to acknowledge the fact. This means, they are permitted (and ordered) by law to lie to the public.
Plus birth announcements in the local newspapers at the time.
That may be the only accurate info we are being given. That is, as long as that wasn't professionally altered. Obama has friends in high places and all it takes is lots of money, and he had tons of it.
Bottom line: We know we aren't being open access to the truth. Records other than the BC are being withheld, why?
I really dont see why we have to continue with this stupidity
When you get that feeling, it's God's way of telling you not to post. Posting on a thread increases it's 'hit' count, and keeps it higher on the Forum Boards.
Frankly, I find it refreshing, and educational, to debate the subject with those of a contrary opinion.
You're not really being serious here, are you? How about the Kenyan Birth Certificate that Lucas Smith obtained in February 2009 from the Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya?
The Kenyan BC bears the signatures of both the attending doctor and the supervisor of obstetrics at the time of birth and also that of the chief hospital administrator, who certified the copy of the BC obtained by Mr. Smith. Although not officially authenticated by the hospital, probably because of serious threats by Kenyan security officials, this document has never been effectively challenged.
An legal affidavit attesting to the document's authenticity was signed by Mr. Smith and was submitted to Federal Judge David O. Carter in September 2009 in support of a court case.
Both the Kenyan BC and Mr. Smith's affidavit can be viewed at the following link.
Actually there is. Some of it generated as recently as 2004, when he was elected to the US Senate. Newspaper reports in Africa called him Kenyan born. But as I said, as long as his father was not a citizen, he's not a Natural Born Citizen.