Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip
Yeh -- by the members of the same institution that is charged with accepting or rejecting the votes of the electoral college, and it included the Paperless One himself.

What part of 'nonbinding resolution' is confusing you?

It may not say it specifically enough for you or other of the Paperless One's apologists, but it does say it.

I did read it, have you? If so please quote the part about both parents.

Hmmm. Did the signatories of SR511 sign on to that yet???

Hmmmm, no. Because one was a Senate non-binding resolution and one was a House non-binding resolution. For both to sign on would require a joint non-binding resolution.

You do know what a non-binding resolution is, don't you?

90 posted on 12/31/2009 2:25:57 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
I did read it

Then try to understand what you read.

You do know what a non-binding resolution is, don't you?

All Senate resolutions are non-binding, just as all House resolutions are non-binding, even when the word "non-binding" doesn't appear in its title, because everything that the Senate and House do is to "bind" others -- never themselves -- just as everything posted by liberals and Obamabats is non-binding. It's meant for others never themselves.

That being said, do you know where Barack Obama's non-binding SR511 is????

92 posted on 01/01/2010 6:14:56 AM PST by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson