Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judicial Watch Announces List of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” for 2009
www.judicialwatch.org ^ | December 28, 2009 | Judicial Watch

Posted on 12/29/2009 6:23:48 AM PST by mike48

Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today released its 2009 list of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians.” The list, in alphabetical order, includes:

1. Senator Christopher Dodd (D-CT): This marks two years in a row for Senator Dodd, who made the 2008 “Ten Most Corrupt” list for his corrupt relationship with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and for accepting preferential treatment and loan terms from Countrywide Financial, a scandal which still dogs him. In 2009, the scandals kept coming for the Connecticut Democrat. In 2009, Judicial Watch filed a Senate ethics complaint against Dodd for undervaluing a property he owns in Ireland on his Senate Financial Disclosure forms. Judicial Watch's complaint forced Dodd to amend the forms. However, press reports suggest the property to this day remains undervalued. Judicial Watch also alleges in the complaint that Dodd obtained a sweetheart deal for the property in exchange for his assistance in obtaining a presidential pardon (during the Clinton administration) and other favors for a long-time friend and business associate. The false financial disclosure forms were part of the cover-up. Dodd remains the head the Senate Banking Committee.

(Excerpt) Read more at judicialwatch.org ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: 111th; 2009review; chrisdodd; corruptdems; judicialwatch; topten
Obama is No. 7
1 posted on 12/29/2009 6:23:48 AM PST by mike48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mike48

I can agree with most of the list with the exception that John Ensign of NV should be replaced with Harry Reid of NV.


2 posted on 12/29/2009 6:32:03 AM PST by diverteach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mike48

Can’t take this list seriously since it omits Harry Reid.


3 posted on 12/29/2009 6:34:19 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: diverteach

That was my initial reaction, that Harry Reid was missing from the list.


4 posted on 12/29/2009 6:35:22 AM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mike48

I don’t know how you can limit yourself to 10.


5 posted on 12/29/2009 6:35:55 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mike48

Just 10 ?


6 posted on 12/29/2009 6:37:50 AM PST by Popman (Election 2010: Congress: your pink slips are coming ............... :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: diverteach
I can agree with most of the list with the exception that John Ensign of NV should be replaced with Harry Reid of NV.

Agreed, but they had to throw at one token republican in there, you know so it's far and balanced / s

7 posted on 12/29/2009 6:39:51 AM PST by Popman (Election 2010: Congress: your pink slips are coming ............... :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mike48

Except for Ensign, they’re all D’s. Culture of Corruption anyone?


8 posted on 12/29/2009 6:42:46 AM PST by Malone LaVeigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mike48

If I was targeted by Judicial Watch, it would be a good sign that I could sleep peacefully for many years to come. It amazes me that people are still dumb enough to contribute to these all-bark, no-bite scamsters.


9 posted on 12/29/2009 6:46:42 AM PST by Notary Sojac ("Goldman Sachs" is to "US economy" as "lamprey" is to "lake trout")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

It’s the people who continue to vote these a&&holes in office that concern me...How can people be so stupid term after term???


10 posted on 12/29/2009 6:55:37 AM PST by Boonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: diverteach
I'm so disappointed Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill didn't make the top ten. Her “campaign contributions” from the croooks of America, EMILY'S List and SEIU should be front page news. Funny how she can't see past them to care that that 2/3 of her constituents are opposed to Obamacare. Yeah, the abortion/porn/sex industry and gangster government owns ya, baby!
11 posted on 12/29/2009 6:55:53 AM PST by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mike48

They did a great job on the list, however 10 is not nearly enough to hold of the crooks in Washington from both parties!


12 posted on 12/29/2009 6:57:57 AM PST by Plumres
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mike48

Hmm, they must be running out of money so they issue a press conference to let people know their con is still in place.
Man I hate those guys. Where’s all the indictments that were supposed to come years ago????
Did Klayman leave or is he still there?


13 posted on 12/29/2009 7:22:34 AM PST by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Notice that the list is done in ALPHABETIC order, not by rank of corruption. This is a must b/c Pelosi would be #1, Reid #2, and The Great Zero would be #3. (I would rank them in that order b/c Pelosi/Reid have had much longer to practice their villainy and w/o them, 0bama would be able to do nothing.) Then let the rest fall however they choose. I wonder what the list would look like had Judicial Watch decided to rank in order of corruption not the alphabet??


14 posted on 12/29/2009 8:20:18 AM PST by 6amgelsmama (The enemy within is most dangerous. Our soldiers aren't the only ones called to fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mike48
"Judicial Watch Announces List of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” for 2009"

Did, or did not, Obama use multiple Social Security numbers? If he did, what sort of crime is it and what is the penalty?

15 posted on 12/29/2009 8:26:03 AM PST by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lx

>> Did Klayman leave or is he still there? <<

He left six years ago. The reason given at the time was that he wanted to run in Florida for the U. S. Senate. But I’ve gotta wonder if that was the true reason for his departure, since later he brought a lawsuit against Judicial Watch.

In any event, Klayman really loves to sue — as witness his suits not only against Judicial Watch but also against his own mother and against Dick Cheney. Moreover, there are rumblings that he’ll soon be suing both Øbambi and Ahmedinijad. Way to go, Larry!


16 posted on 12/29/2009 12:35:59 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson