Skip to comments.Did Obama Place INTERPOL Above U.S. Law?
Posted on 12/29/2009 2:34:25 PM PST by BobMcCartyWrites
After learning recently that President Barack Obama had, on Dec. 17, quietly amended Executive Order 12425, I decided to find out what impact, if any, it might have on Americans. At first blind to the potential ramifications of the amendment, I was startled at what I found once the pieces of this disturbing political puzzle started falling in place.
In order to understand the amendment, I had to first look at the original version of Executive Order 12425 signed by President Ronald Reagan June 16, 1983. The wording of that EO appears below:
By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and statutes of the United States, including Section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669, 22 U.S.C. 288), it is hereby ordered that the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), in which the United States participates pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 263a, is hereby designated as a public international organization entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions and immunities conferred by the International Organizations Immunities Act; except those provided by Section 2(c), the portions of Section 2(d) and Section 3 relating to customs duties and federal internal-revenue importation taxes, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act. This designation is not intended to abridge in any respect the privileges, exemptions or immunities which such organization may have acquired or may acquire by international agreement or by Congressional action.
Note that President Reagan cites the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945 and notes the exception of Section 2(c), the portions of Section 2(d) and Section 3 relating to customs duties and federal internal-revenue importation taxes, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act.
Next, I looked at Executive Order 12971 which was signed by President Bill Clinton Sept. 15, 1995. It removed from the first sentence of EO 12425 the words, "the portions of 2(d) and" and the words "relating to customs duties and federal internal-revenue importation taxes".
Finally, I looked at the language below that President Obama used to amend EO 12425:
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words "except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act" and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.
Rather than delve into the nitty-gritty details of every amended section (i.e., 2(c), 2(d), 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Act, I'll simply refer you to the Act and then get to the heart of the matter.
According to Steve Schippert at Threats Watch, the Obama amendment to EO 12425 results in the following:
Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?
More to come, I'm sure.
The President did not, strictly speaking, place INTERPOL “above US Law”. You will not have INTERPOL agents arresting US citizens and removing them from the country.
What he did do is extend and deepen their diplomatic immunity grated by Act of Congress and consequently reduce oversight of their operations in the United States and not adequately explain we he did so. It’s a matter for concern and somewhat troubling.
However the good news is what is done by Executive Order can also be undone by Executive Order by a future President. Also the present Congress or a future one can and should hold hearings into the matter and, if necessary, change the Act and change INTERPOL’s status
I have a crazy idea...WHY DOESN’T SOMEBODY ASK HIM WHY HE SIGNED THIS?
ABC’s Jake Tapper has asked to no avail - via Tapper’s Twitter:
“i’ve asked the WH twice now about the executive order the president signed exempting Interpol from certain laws. No response.”
To let Interpol do the domestic spying bit that the FBI and CIA can't, and then to report back to him?
Hows that ICC shaping up for the US Just ask Obama !
ABC Jake Tapper’s latest tweet:
“got a response from administration on Interpol thing. more to come.”
Gotta love real journalists. Shocked that Tapper isn’t working for Fox or WSJ.
Tapper’s great - a real old fashioned journalist looking for the truth behind the story.
Really, what IS he doing at ABC?
Anyone who is above the law of the land is also outside the law of the land. They apparently exist in an entirely lawless zone. It’s good to know the playing field if you ever have to deal with one of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.