Chrysler Dealers and attorneys Donofrio and Pidgeon file lawsuit in NYC
[Thanks, Danae, Diver Dave, and SeizetheCarp.]
Posted on 12/29/2009 3:20:28 PM PST by Danae
This column reported December 5, 2009 that Leo Donofrio Esq. and Steve Pidgeon Esq. would be filing two cases against the Obama Administration and Government. The first a Bankruptcy case in the New York District, and the second to be filed in Washington D.C., a Quo Warranto case directly challenging Barack Obama.
It can now be reported the Bankruptcy case for the Chrysler Dealers who were stripped of their dealerships by the Obama Administration has indeed been filed. Donofrio and Pidgeon have filed a Rule 60 Motion to reconsider on behalf of 21 rejected Chrysler dealers. As was expected, several more dealers have joined in the suit as well. Docket number 6137 was filed today, 12/29/2009 Motion for Relief from Stay to Allow Appeal to Continue filed by Randyl Meigs on behalf of Tommy Manuel Chrysler - Jeep, Inc.. with hearing to be held on 1/21/2010 at 10:00 AM at Courtroom 523 (AJG) Responses due by 1/14/2010. The Debtor in this case is the old Chrysler.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
The horse is out of the barn and the whole USA set and watched it happen.
True enough, time to go after the thieves who done the deed...
Ping to the usual suspects.
If the second suit is true, this is HUGE!
I have it from Donofrio himself, that the second suit is indeed real. They needed to get the NYC one filed first. DC is commin.
You can bet CNN, MSNBC et al. will be trying to dig up dirt on Leo. Good luck. His integrity is pure and he’s top notch on the law. I love Orly but she shoots from the hip too much. Leo has the scrubs on and scalpel in hand!
That would be King Obama's communists corrupt crew.
A prick with ears is an obamination.
Or, is it more likely (as I've read elsewhere) that the QW suit may be filed in the event that the BK suit fails?
Now this is gonna get pretty interesting so I’ll mark my spot with a ping to LucyT
If, by the "second suit," you mean the quo warranto, no, it is probably not huge.
Only the Attorney General of the U.S. has the right to file an action for quo warranto. If the Attorney General refuses to file suit, someone else can file it, but only if the district court in D.C. gives them permission to file. There already was one attempt to file a quo warranto suit in D.C. challenging Obama's eleigibility to hold office, and the court refused permission to file it. I doubt this attempt will fare better.
Leo is the real deal, and is dead serious about it. Orly, god bless here, is very emotional about the whole issue, and it clowds her judgment. Which isn’t to say that she hasn’t done good work. Without her, the story might have died. That being said, he is off the mark in her cases. This can only effectively be done in one court, the DC court, and it will have to be a Quo Warranto.... its not going to be easy to get or do, but at least its the right case, WITH STANDING, in the right court, right venue. Right there it trumps all other “birther” cases to date. It isn’t a birther case anyway. Donofrio is pretty darned certain Obama was born in Hawaii. So am I for what its worth. What is relevant is that you cannot ever hold the citizenship at the time of your birth and be considered a Natural Born Citizen as it was meant by the language of the Constitution and the Founding Fathers as they wrote it. They meant to make certain that the person commanding the Armies of this Nation were singularly and solely only ever American. Obama cannot meet that qualification, and never has. He was British, American and Kenyan at the moment of his birth.
Happy New Year, Broke Obama!
You thought 2009 was tough? It’s only going to get worse for the usurper.
I do believe that this is what Donofrio and Pidgeon will be attempting to do.
No one has ever implied it would be easy. If its granted.... Woah.... look out.
Leo and Steve are tops. They can get it done.
I forgot to ask, do you know if that was tossed due to standing? I seem to remember that being the case, but honestly, I have a really bad cold and I can’t remember.
The Dealerships have standing. Thats what makes it a very different case.
Ditto! Those, my FRiend, are exactly my thoughts.
“The Dealerships have standing. Thats what makes it a very different case.”
In case you haven’t noticed, there seems to be no one who has standing in this country but obamination and his many stooges.
Nah... I hadn’t noticed.....
Good grief.
Sorry if I sounded sarcastic, but the poser in chief just makes me sick.
I don't believe that the standing issue is assured yet, although it well might be approved by the DC Circuit.
Judge Carter emboldened D’Onofrio and his plaintiffs to spend the money to file this case by stating that a quo warranto could be brought against the president only in the DC Circuit.
In doing so, Judge Carter disagreed with the DOJ which argued before him that quo warranto didn't apply to the POTUS at all! That tells me that the issue of standing is far from settled.
My non-lawyer expectation is that as soon as D’Onofrio requests permission for quo warranto from the DC Circuit, the DOJ will be back defending Obama with this same argument that quo warranto doesn't apply to Obama hoping that the DC Circuit will disagree with Judge Carter and grant a summary judgment against D’Onofrio.
I expect appeals on this issue of whether quo warranto applies to POTUS to go all the way to SCOTUS before any quo warranto hearing is even held on the merits of Obama's NBC status.
(sigh)
Chrysler Dealers and attorneys Donofrio and Pidgeon file lawsuit in NYC
[Thanks, Danae, Diver Dave, and SeizetheCarp.]
Bump for later.
I’m looking forward to a Congressional majority that will investigate the theft and thuggery perpetrated in the name of hope and change.
This litigation is a start. The Supremes were dancing the dance earlier this year of wanting a proper question brought before them. Do we have one now?
OK I guess I am confused as to why the Chrysler dealerships are going to bring the Quo Warranto case?
I read several times the explanation of the bankruptcy suit and I think I understand that as much as my tiny-non-lawyer brain can, but I don’t get the connection to the second case. You have to excuse me as I haven’t been able to keep up with much of the lawsuit stuff
Good. Keep the pot boiling. Apart from the issue of Obama’s legitimacy, it seems to me that he violated the rule of law and the constitution with his arbitrary proceedings. And his bias against dealerships with Republican connections was flagrant.
ping
BUMP!!!
Today was a doozy for Obamma.
National security in a melt down, and Airlines losing business because of it.
The Muzzie in Chief is looking like a dirtbag.
He sure is. If it keeps raining on his parade he'll soon turn into a mudpie and disintegrate - we hope.
I sure as heck HOPE so!
Lol, don't we all! They say he's thin skinned so a nervous breakdown could be our salvation!
Good text, moving fast and you made it the color of ...umm...MUD! His name is mud.
.
You know I always stick to exact quotes
Exact
Yes, you do.
Did I quibble with that or you just turning into a seafood that starts with a ‘C’? Lol
Thanks for the ping, LucyT.
I hear a thump, the sound of a rotten log being kicked over, and all sorts of little beasties are now being exposed to the light, and are writhing in turmoil....
Thank you for the ping!
Here’s some interesting reading about Terri/Donofrio and Hawaii!!
Thanks for the ping!
I hope it happens in public. That would be priceless.
I don’t blame you a bit.
Listen to the cheerful clacking of all those roach feet scattering... ah.... music to my ears.
Agreed. Good luck to Leo and Steve Pidgeon.
I may be wrong but I have the impression that Leo said the DC Circuit is the first and last stop. I thought he said it could not be appealed to SCOTUS but I could be wrong. The Chrysler dealers were harmed by Obama and his criminal admin of thugs. They should have standing.
Take
No
Prisoners
IMO the ‘heat’ is one reason they are trying to cram the health care plan in post haste speed.
I can live with that! :)
The Dealerships do have standing. Most certainly they do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.