Skip to comments.Lead Plaintiff James Anderer On Fox-2nd Interview
Posted on 01/02/2010 5:05:23 AM PST by urtax$@work
Video of James Anderer discussing the Motion to Reconsider filed on behalf of 21 former Chrysler dealers by Steve and I. This was during Bulls and Bears Fox Business News, December 29, 2009 at 4:48 PM.
P.S. Have a wonderful New Year.
(Excerpt) Read more at naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com ...
Go to Leo’s Natural Born Citizen Blog to view Video.
Happy New Year Leo and Steve
Happy New Year Leo and Steve
Anderer continuing to blame Obama indicates to me that he is still on board with what D’Onofrio tells us is the impending quo warranto filing in the DC Circuit. The arbitration buy-off didn't work!
For the longest time D’Onofrio was focused exclusively on the dual citizen aspect of Obama’s NBC eligibility and was dismissive of the HI BC issue, which he characterized as conspiracy theory.
But in late 2009 he relented and while claiming that he “believes” Obama was born in HI he began to aggressively interrogate HI Vital Records demanding disclosure of index records of vital events for Obama and his family.
This give me hope that D’Onofrio, in his quo warranto, will include a demand on Obama to produce not just a legal defense of his dual citizen NBC status, but also a demand for the “best evidence” of his HI birth, and that would be the original HI vital records (not a short-form COLB).
Of course, after DOJ litigates up to SCOTUS that quo warranto doesn't apply to POTUS, I expect the DOJ to then litigate all the way to SCOTUS an assertion to Obama should only need to provide the familiar COLB in response to a quo warranto demand and should not be required to provide release of the vital records.
I expect several round trips to SCOTUS not unlike what was needed to overcome Nixon's claims of executive privilege to avoid release of the Watergate tapes.
However, I believe if quo warranto finds Obama ineligible to be president, he will be removed from POTUS by the courts, and Biden would be installed because president-elect Obama was never eligible.
Biden would be elevated, it would seem fairly certain. But I have seen comments saying that whether Obama was “never” eligible could depend on whether he was ineligible due to intentional fraud (hiding foreign birth), in which case his ineligibility would be retroactive to inauguration, or ineligible due to a “case of first impression” SCOTUS ruling that he was not NBC due to having a foreign citizen parent. The latter type of ineligibility might not be retroactive. Worst case it might be applied only prospectively, giving Obama a Mulligan! (Heaven fore-fend!)
Another possibility is there was a change to the original Hawaiian document when Lolo Soetoro adopted him as Barry Soetoro.
Finally, I am not sure Obama's mother was in US at alleged date of Obama's birth. She could have been in Kenya or Canada, where she began classes shortly after the alleged birthdate.
If D’Onofrio actually files his quo warranto placing the burden of proof on Obama to defend his NBC eligibility, it is my hope that the liberal media, which in 2007-08 failed to vet Obama because he was too precious, will have turned enough against him because of his failures and lies to demand an answer to the obvious question:
What is Obama hiding that is so damaging that he won't release his original HI vital records?
A demand by the public and the increasingly confrontational media might even compel Obama to release the HI vital records long before SCOTUS would order him to on appeal.
Then the next battle over what they actually reveal will begin. Looks like a long struggle, but worth it, if only to tighten up vetting to weed out future usurper presidential candidates.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.