Skip to comments.FIRST TIME IN U.S. HISTORY THAT A SITTING PRESIDENTíS ELIGIBILITY QUESTIONED BY MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Posted on 01/06/2010 6:30:17 AM PST by SvenMagnussen
(Jan. 5, 2010) The Post & Email can publicly confirm that on the first of December, last, U.S. Congressman Nathan Deal (GA-R) challenged the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of the U.S. presidency.
Todd Smith, Chief of Staff for Representative Nathan Deal of the United States House of Representatives serving Georgias 9th district, has confirmed today that Deal has sent a letter to Barack Hussein Obama requesting him to prove his eligibility for the office of President of the United States of America. The letter was sent electronically the first of December 2009 in pdf format, and Mr. Smith said that Representative Deal has confirmation from Obamas staff that it has been received. The letter did not have additional signatories. It originated solely from Representative Deal.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
“So if you’ve got a source, I’d love to see it. “
If I go through the trouble to go find it and post it, you think NS and the Obamanoids will stop defending Him?
That's very strong evidence indeed! As everyone knows, obscure African newspapers never get their facts wrong./sarcasm
I would be very curious myself to see the source of this oft-cited quote. What I've seen were nothing more than claims that it has been posted many times on the internet, never the actual source itself.
“That’s very strong evidence indeed! As everyone knows, obscure African newspapers never get their facts wrong./sarcasm”
Newspapers are never wrong or manipulated. The two announcements it Hawaii for example. He was supposedly born in a hospital that didn’t even deliver babies until a couple of years after he was allegedly born there.
Seems like some newspaper somewhere should be interested...
The announcements do not exactly help the birthers cause, in my opinion. There is nothing factual about the birth announcements appearing in two different newspapers but it kind of adds credence to Obama being borned in the US.
First of all, no one on FR is defending Obama. Using facts to debunk kooky conspiracy theories about a man is not the same thing as defending him. I am certain that virtually every Freeper who spends time debunking birther nonsense loaths Obama as much as the birthers do.
The difference is that the anti-birthers don't see birtherism as a fruitful means of opposing him. In fact, we see birtherism as counterproductive, in that it distracts the base from the real issues.
Second of all, yes, if it could be verified that Obama admitted he's not a natural born citizen, I would certainly reconsider my position.
So please, show the evidence. If you can prove he admitted to not being a NBC, that would be significant.
0bamas Noelani Kindergarten records are oddly missing from the the State of Hawaii Department of Education.
This is an important feature because K-records for original school entry would have contained the following:
1. His REAL Birth Certificate.
2. An application with the following:
1. His Legal name.
2. Parents or Legal Guardians names.
3. Date of Birth
4. Place of Birth
5. Vaccination Records
(revealing a timeline to the place and DOB.)
It also is important for two reasons:
A. The Dept. of Education does not lose the records of one particular student. (Who paid whom what sum to make this record disappear?)
B. There would have been NO shameful low-test scores, NO embarrassing Equal Opportunity advancements, and NO trails of fraudulent funding to hide which could possibly excuse the quashing of public school Kindergarten entry records.
For the rest of his life he attended very expensive private schools and has had his records legally sealed to deny the public, his true life story.
This is different. Hawaii should be able to verify he attended their school since he is featured in class photographs. State and federal tax dollars paid for his initial year of education. Why is there no documentation?
This is the tip of the iceberg of an intentionally erased life of a fraudulent conman and it reeks of complicity by officials within the State of Hawaiis Dept. of Health & Dept. of Education.
Of course newpapers can be wrong. However, when two different major newspapers serving a major US metropolitan area independently publish the same birth announcement, based on data they received directly from the state's department of health, it's pretty unlikely that they're wrong.
The same cannot be said for a story in an obscure African paper that doesn't even list its sources.
e was supposedly born in a hospital that didnt even deliver babies until a couple of years after he was allegedly born there.
That's the first time I've seen it claimed that Kapiolani Medical Center didn't deliver babies in 1961. Have you got a source for that?
“The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a ‘native’ citizen of the United States of America.”
Obama may not have personally said it, but fight the ‘smears’ does
Nothing except Hawaii's vital records, which say he was born in Honolulu.
It would help.
Obama's loving it. He's got 40% of his opposition tilting at windmills instead of doing something that could actually make a difference. Congratulations, birthers.
And of course you can point to the clause in the Constitution that defines natural-born?
Also, there are articles saying he was Keyan born.
There are also articles saying he is U.S. born as well.
He did not ask them to correct that because it must have been true. I didnt write those articles, his campaign must have authorized them.
Of course they did.
Huh? How exactly is that an admission that he's not a natural born citizen? What am I missing?
Yeah, and it also lists Hawaii as his birthplace. So how do you figure it helps the birther case?
see post #151
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.