Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FIRST TIME IN U.S. HISTORY THAT A SITTING PRESIDENTíS ELIGIBILITY QUESTIONED BY MEMBER OF CONGRESS
The Post & Email ^ | Jan. 5, 2010 | P. Patriot

Posted on 01/06/2010 6:30:17 AM PST by SvenMagnussen

(Jan. 5, 2010) — The Post & Email can publicly confirm that on the first of December, last, U.S. Congressman Nathan Deal (GA-R) challenged the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of the U.S. presidency.

Todd Smith, Chief of Staff for Representative Nathan Deal of the United States House of Representatives serving Georgia’s 9th district, has confirmed today that Deal has sent a letter to Barack Hussein Obama requesting him to prove his eligibility for the office of President of the United States of America. The letter was sent electronically the first of December 2009 in pdf format, and Mr. Smith said that Representative Deal has confirmation from Obama’s staff that it has been received. The letter did not have additional signatories. It originated solely from Representative Deal.

(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: barackhusseinobama; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; deal; dontstepintroll; drew68troll; eligibility; fraud; liar; nathandeal; nonsequitertroll; obama; puppet; putativepresident; trollsonfr; usurper; whoisyourdaddy; whoseyourdaddy; whosyourdaddy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 681-696 next last
To: SvenMagnussen
Obama’s Friends Working to Amend the Natural Born Citizen Requirement

If the Facts Don’t Support the Theory, Destroy the Facts Comment left by: CreativeOgre: While digging my way through the Internet last night, I came across the following paper, written by SARAH P. HERLIHY. It’s title

AMENDING THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN REQUIREMENT: GLOBALIZATION AS THE IMPETUS AND THE OBSTACLE

caught my eye, and had to read it…

http://lawreview.kentlaw.edu/articles/81-1/Herlihy.pdf

I had to ask myself, what would drive any American to want to change a clause in a document that is the very foundation of our government? So, I kept digging, and found that SARAH P. HERLIHY is employed by Kirkland & Ellis LLP http://www.kirkland.com

Noting that this law firm is based in Chicago, the light bulb was shining a little brighter . Upon looking at the firm, and the partners, I found that Bruce I. Ettelson, P.C., is Member of finance committees of U.S. Senators Barack Obama and Richard Durbin.

http://www.kirkland.com/sitecontent.cfm … temID=7845 (towards bottom of the page) In addition, Jack S. Levin, P.C., another partner who, in December 2002 was presented the ” Illinois Venture Capital Association’s lifetime achievement award for service to the private equity/venture capital community” presented by Sen. Barack Obama

So it sure looks like Obama’s people have looked into the matter of “Natural born” as far back as early 2006. What is even more disturbing is that it would appear that they are following the thought of : “If the facts do not support the theory, Destroy the facts!”

161 posted on 01/06/2010 11:18:18 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

None of Hawaii’s vital records have been released, hence no evidence.

Evidence

That which makes evident or manifest; that which furnishes, or tends to furnish, proof; any mode of proof; the ground of belief or judgement;


162 posted on 01/06/2010 11:19:04 AM PST by Josephat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: jackv
Name: Barry Soetoro Religion: .... Islam Nationality: ..... Indonesian...

"Place of Birth....Honolulu, Hawaii"

163 posted on 01/06/2010 11:21:33 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

Of course a ‘native’ citizen is, indeed, an American citizen.

However they avoid the term ‘natural’ born.

Why?

If ‘native and ‘natural mean the same thing — to them — then why not just use the term Natural Born: as used in the constitution?

Yes, we all understand that some believe the two terms are the same.

The question was when did Obama say he was native born?

Well, fight the smears said it.

Hope that helps.

STE=Q


164 posted on 01/06/2010 11:22:22 AM PST by STE=Q ("It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government" ... Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
You don't seem to get the meaning of “nationality” and the requirement for potus.
It apparently will never matter to the die hard obama lovers that he's a usurper.
Bottoms up on the kool-aid!! And those bumper stickers are looking pretty rough!
165 posted on 01/06/2010 11:23:42 AM PST by jackv (The darkness hates the light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Josephat
None of Hawaii’s vital records have been released, hence no evidence.

Hawaii's director of public health has officially confirmed that the state's records show him being born in Hawaii.

166 posted on 01/06/2010 11:25:45 AM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: jackv
You don't seem to get the meaning of “nationality” and the requirement for potus.

That his step father may have believed Indonesia claimed him as a citizen when he was 8 years old in no way disqualifies him from the presidency.

167 posted on 01/06/2010 11:27:27 AM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Do you really not get it or are your questions all part of the plan to throw everyone off?
We understand that tactic well.


168 posted on 01/06/2010 11:28:03 AM PST by jackv (The darkness hates the light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: STE=Q
Of course a ‘native’ citizen is, indeed, an American citizen. However they avoid the term ‘natural’ born.Why?

Because "native-born" and "natural born" are synonymous.

If ‘native and ‘natural mean the same thing — to them — then why not just use the term Natural Born: as used in the constitution?

Because the courts have also used "native born" and "natural born" synonymously.

169 posted on 01/06/2010 11:30:07 AM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

Then the question deserves an answer, huh?
What does the constitution say about dual citizenship?
Prove it as a lie then.


170 posted on 01/06/2010 11:30:33 AM PST by jackv (The darkness hates the light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: STE=Q
If ‘native and ‘natural mean the same thing — to them — then why not just use the term Natural Born: as used in the constitution?

Why does federal law use the term "citizens at birth" and some Supreme Court decisions use the same term while others use "citizen by birt"? It's all irrelevant, the Constitution identifes two specific forms of citizenship - natural born and naturalized. If you are not one then you are the other. "Native born" or "natural born", "citizen at birth" or "citizen by birth", they're all different terms for the same thing.

171 posted on 01/06/2010 11:31:18 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

OMG!! You really really don’t get it!!
God help us.


172 posted on 01/06/2010 11:32:18 AM PST by jackv (The darkness hates the light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

Here’s something I found...

You are ill-informed on the “birther” issue. Barack Obama, by his own admission, was a British subject at birth. He has never denied having a Kenyan father, who himself was a British subject as a Kenyan native. This is easly established under the British Nationality Act of 1948. He is therefore disqualified to run for the office of the President, because the office is not available to subjects of other governments. The issue is very simple, and very obvious. Obama himself admitted that he wasn’t a natural born citizen when he debated Alan Keyes in 2004.


173 posted on 01/06/2010 11:32:55 AM PST by Lower55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Candor7; maggief
He should be careful to not pull the shower cord! LOL.

Oh Lord! That takes me back to those unblurred pictures of precious doing her thing at the oh, so boring Duke LAX party.

Had the details of those pictures been made public even Barry Sanders and Cash Michaels would be hard pressed to say "something happened" to baby girl.

174 posted on 01/06/2010 11:33:17 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: jackv
Do you really not get it or are your questions all part of the plan to throw everyone off?

What is it that I'm not supposed to be getting?

175 posted on 01/06/2010 11:34:16 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

OMG!! Once again are you seriously STILL missing the point or do you really not get that being potus is not simply a matter of birthplace but also citizenship???
Do you not get the difference??


176 posted on 01/06/2010 11:35:20 AM PST by jackv (The darkness hates the light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Could be he was born in a mud hut somewhere in Africa with a witch doctor shaking bones over him as a midwife delivered him...No hospital...no doctor...no records...
...no evidence supporting your scenario...


And, you have no evidence proving otherwise. If you do, please provide us with it.


177 posted on 01/06/2010 11:35:45 AM PST by Know et al (Everything I know I read in the newspaper and that's the reason for my ignorance: Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lower55
“Newspapers are never wrong or manipulated. The two announcements it Hawaii for example. He was supposedly born in a hospital that didn’t even deliver babies until a couple of years after he was allegedly born there.”

Honestly, can this stuff get any stupider? Kapi’olani didn't deliver babies? That would be the Kapi’olani where the Nordyke twins this idiotic fantasy keeps trumpeting were born. The one identified on the Nordyke twin birth certificates as “Kapi’olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital.” I'm sure a hospital with that name wouldn't deliver babies. After all, what do babies have to do with maternity and gynecological issues?

Even if you try and ressurect that tired old Queen's Hospital non-story, they delivered babies, too.

This is exactly why the birther movement is perceived as an embarrassment to rational thought. It just makes stuff up, no matter how insane, and keeps parroting it long after it has been discredited.

178 posted on 01/06/2010 11:36:47 AM PST by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Lower55
So a question for you, what leads you to believe that something which was a well known fact for years before the election, that no one with any authority objected to or even mentioned, is going to change anything over a year after the election?
179 posted on 01/06/2010 11:38:54 AM PST by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Lower55
He is therefore disqualified to run for the office of the President, because the office is not available to subjects of other governments.

Obama's Kenyan citizenship lapsed when he turned 21 and did not give up his U.S. citizenship so problem solved.


180 posted on 01/06/2010 11:39:20 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 681-696 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson