FIRST TIME IN U.S. HISTORY THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT’S ELIGIBILITY QUESTIONED BY MEMBER OF CONGRESS

The Post & Email ^ | Jan. 5, 2010 | P. Patriot

[SvenMagnussen]

(Jan. 5, 2010) — The Post & Email can publicly confirm that on the first of December, last, U.S. Congressman Nathan Deal (GA-R) challenged the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of the U.S. presidency.

Todd Smith, Chief of Staff for Representative Nathan Deal of the United States House of Representatives serving Georgia’s 9th district, has confirmed today that Deal has sent a letter to Barack Hussein Obama requesting him to prove his eligibility for the office of President of the United States of America. The letter was sent electronically the first of December 2009 in pdf format, and Mr. Smith said that Representative Deal has confirmation from Obama’s staff that it has been received. The letter did not have additional signatories. It originated solely from Representative Deal.

[curiosity]

He said he was born at Queen’s.

No he did not.

[Red Steel]

No, Article II, Section 1 says the president must be a natural-born citizen. It does not define the term, and doesn't mention dual citizenship at all.

A duel citizen has split his allegiances to another country or king is not a natural born citizen, and any future court who honestly understands the Constitutional clause of NBC will not substantiate or uphold the liberal viewpoint by conflating the intent and meaning where Obama is a natural born citizen.

[azishot]

Hope it made you feel better.

[jackv]

“Are you seriously alleging that the entire Hawaii Department of Health is in on some grand conspiracy to cover up Barry’s original place of birth?”

That’s not too hard to imagine considering the way this administration has bought and bribed and blackmailed it’s way for healthcare reform.

[tired_old_conservative]

Because pretty much every common law precedent known to man precludes a person not born in a country and having no parents who are citizens of that country from being considered a “native born citizen,” for reasons really too obvious to spell out.

[Non-Sequitur]

Well why not then?? If dual citizenship is no big deal?

Because people who move here and become citizens are naturalized citizens, not natural born citizens. Or are you not familiar with the difference between the two?

[Star Traveler]

Yeah, I know what that author “P. Patriot” [??] meant; he just picked the words that have an unfortunate meaning... with the 9/11 Truthers...

That leads me to believe that this writer is not a professional writer or else he would have known that...

I mean, I wouldn’t dare use that word (now, after the 9/11 Truther nuts are out there), unless I was intending to purposely slander someone... :-)

[rolling_stone]

I've never seen people just make stuff up like birthers.

They can't begin to deceive like obamaites.. Still waiting for your retraction here:

He did what you asked. He got the only actual documentation Hawaii issues. You don't care. Why should he waste another moment's consideration on you?

Still tying to pull the wool over everyone's eyes I see. Obama's supposed COLB was issued in 2007 when long form certificates were available and required for Homelands documentation. When did they change that and why? Did you know one can still get a copy of their long form certificate by request?

[Elderberry]

Dr. Fukino’s statement has always seemed a little bit odd to me. It seems that the Dr. is only stating to have seen the records on file. And the verification of birth location is by those records and not by the Dr.

[Non-Sequitur]

Google is your friend.

I'm more of a Bing person these days. So what does Sarah say guarantees us that right?

[STE=Q]

Repeating the same falsehood over and over again will not make it true.

"Seems to work pretty well for your side"

_________________________________________________________

LOL!!!

STE=Q

[Red Steel]

Yes, as I noted, a few sources did say that, apparently erroneously. Kapi’olani appears to have been accepted as the place of birth in Hawaii. But in any event, both delivered babies in 1961.

The press once reported that Queens hospital was the birth place for Obama until people working on Obama's behalf changed that to Kapiʻolani. So what hospital was Obama born in? Are they lying now or were the lying before? Or are both hospital stories lies? ...LoL.

[jackv]

The fact you do not apply this logic to bo is pretty funny.

[curiosity]

Do a search, yourself.

I have, and I can say with confidence that there is no evidence, as in nada, zero, zilch, that Obama ever admitted to not being a natural born citizen during his debate with Keyes in 2004.

I’m not going to do your homework for you.

LucyT, your problem is that you never do your own homework, let alone homework for others.

Let me give you a little tip, LucyT. Next time someone makes a strong claim about something controversial, don't believe it until you've seen evidence to support it. This is especially true if you read the claim on a blog. That will spare you the emabrassment of situations like this one.

[Non-Sequitur]

A duel citizen has split his allegiances to another country or king is not a natural born citizen...

So you say. Now if only the Constitution or the law or some Supreme Court decision said that.

...and any future court who honestly understands the Constitutional clause of NBC will not substantiate or uphold the liberal viewpoint by conflating the intent and meaning where Obama is a natural born citizen.

Make sure that they know that.

[rxsid]

"Personally, I suspect that even if we could prove that the President was not Constitutionally eligible, it would be a moot point. I remain agnostic on the matter of O’s eligibility... I really do not know if he’s a natural-born citizen or not... but I also believe that the right has already lost on this issue. It’ll be like that Dem senator said about Clinton, to the effect of “I don’t care if you have videotape of him murdering somone, we’re not going to convict him.”"

Barry doesn't necessarily need to be convicted by the Senate. Nixon resigned after the House passage of allegations (impeached). And, it was 2+ years before SCOTUS ordered the release of the Watergate tapes which then caused a "lack of confidence" within the Senate. Nixon, of course, resigned before he was "convicted."

If enough of the country is aware Barry is a usurper, there's little doubt he'd retain the confidence of anyone in Congress except the far left (Pelosi, Reed, Waxman, etc). I can't imagine the joint chiefs of staff would continue to honor any "order" coming from a usurper. Barry can be "forced" to resign.

[jackv]

Ding ding ding! We finally agree. BO does not qualify!!

[Know et al]

You are quite naive. There is no mention of a birth certificate, only verification.

Why did they not expressly state that there was a birth certificate on record?

Or, could they not say there was one?

If they are referring to a COLB, it is not proof of his birth in HI.

Please give me a logical reason Obama would hide his BC if he was born in the US? Then, give me a logical reason he would hide the documents of his history if he had nothing to hide?

[jackv]

“Now if only the Constitution or the law or some Supreme Court decision said that.”

You actually believe it doesn’t???

Bottem’s up!!!

[tired_old_conservative]

Obama’s campaign sent in $10 or whatever, got a standard issue COLB from Hawaii, and thought, like any normal person, that this would settle the issue. They didn't realize they were dealing with a bunch of lunatics impervious to reality.

And the Homelands documentation is a special case related to determining Hawaiian ancestry for special benefits. But if you look at their current website, you will see the following:

"Birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth and Certifications of Live Birth) and Certificates of Hawaiian Birth are the primary documents used to determine native Hawaiian qualification.

The Department of Hawaiian Home Lands accepts both Certificates of Live Birth (original birth certificate) and Certifications of Live Birth because they are official government records documenting an individual’s birth. The Certificate of Live Birth generally has more information which is useful for genealogical purposes as compared to the Certification of Live Birth which is a computer-generated printout that provides specific details of a person’s birth. Although original birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth) are preferred for their greater detail, the State Department of Health (DOH) no longer issues Certificates of Live Birth. When a request is made for a copy of a birth certificate, the DOH issues a Certification of Live Birth.”

It's really not mysterious at all.