Skip to comments.FIRST TIME IN U.S. HISTORY THAT A SITTING PRESIDENTíS ELIGIBILITY QUESTIONED BY MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Posted on 01/06/2010 6:30:17 AM PST by SvenMagnussen
(Jan. 5, 2010) The Post & Email can publicly confirm that on the first of December, last, U.S. Congressman Nathan Deal (GA-R) challenged the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of the U.S. presidency.
Todd Smith, Chief of Staff for Representative Nathan Deal of the United States House of Representatives serving Georgias 9th district, has confirmed today that Deal has sent a letter to Barack Hussein Obama requesting him to prove his eligibility for the office of President of the United States of America. The letter was sent electronically the first of December 2009 in pdf format, and Mr. Smith said that Representative Deal has confirmation from Obamas staff that it has been received. The letter did not have additional signatories. It originated solely from Representative Deal.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
No he did not.
A duel citizen has split his allegiances to another country or king is not a natural born citizen, and any future court who honestly understands the Constitutional clause of NBC will not substantiate or uphold the liberal viewpoint by conflating the intent and meaning where Obama is a natural born citizen.
Hope it made you feel better.
“Are you seriously alleging that the entire Hawaii Department of Health is in on some grand conspiracy to cover up Barry’s original place of birth?”
That’s not too hard to imagine considering the way this administration has bought and bribed and blackmailed it’s way for healthcare reform.
Because people who move here and become citizens are naturalized citizens, not natural born citizens. Or are you not familiar with the difference between the two?
Yeah, I know what that author “P. Patriot” [??] meant; he just picked the words that have an unfortunate meaning... with the 9/11 Truthers...
That leads me to believe that this writer is not a professional writer or else he would have known that...
I mean, I wouldn’t dare use that word (now, after the 9/11 Truther nuts are out there), unless I was intending to purposely slander someone... :-)
They can't begin to deceive like obamaites.. Still waiting for your retraction here:
He did what you asked. He got the only actual documentation Hawaii issues. You don't care. Why should he waste another moment's consideration on you?
Still tying to pull the wool over everyone's eyes I see. Obama's supposed COLB was issued in 2007 when long form certificates were available and required for Homelands documentation. When did they change that and why? Did you know one can still get a copy of their long form certificate by request?
Dr. Fukino’s statement has always seemed a little bit odd to me. It seems that the Dr. is only stating to have seen the records on file. And the verification of birth location is by those records and not by the Dr.
I'm more of a Bing person these days. So what does Sarah say guarantees us that right?
"Seems to work pretty well for your side"
The press once reported that Queens hospital was the birth place for Obama until people working on Obama's behalf changed that to Kapiʻolani. So what hospital was Obama born in? Are they lying now or were the lying before? Or are both hospital stories lies? ...LoL.
The fact you do not apply this logic to bo is pretty funny.
I have, and I can say with confidence that there is no evidence, as in nada, zero, zilch, that Obama ever admitted to not being a natural born citizen during his debate with Keyes in 2004.
Im not going to do your homework for you.
LucyT, your problem is that you never do your own homework, let alone homework for others.
Let me give you a little tip, LucyT. Next time someone makes a strong claim about something controversial, don't believe it until you've seen evidence to support it. This is especially true if you read the claim on a blog. That will spare you the emabrassment of situations like this one.
So you say. Now if only the Constitution or the law or some Supreme Court decision said that.
...and any future court who honestly understands the Constitutional clause of NBC will not substantiate or uphold the liberal viewpoint by conflating the intent and meaning where Obama is a natural born citizen.
Make sure that they know that.
Barry doesn't necessarily need to be convicted by the Senate. Nixon resigned after the House passage of allegations (impeached). And, it was 2+ years before SCOTUS ordered the release of the Watergate tapes which then caused a "lack of confidence" within the Senate. Nixon, of course, resigned before he was "convicted."
If enough of the country is aware Barry is a usurper, there's little doubt he'd retain the confidence of anyone in Congress except the far left (Pelosi, Reed, Waxman, etc). I can't imagine the joint chiefs of staff would continue to honor any "order" coming from a usurper. Barry can be "forced" to resign.
Ding ding ding! We finally agree. BO does not qualify!!
Why did they not expressly state that there was a birth certificate on record?
Or, could they not say there was one?
If they are referring to a COLB, it is not proof of his birth in HI.
Please give me a logical reason Obama would hide his BC if he was born in the US? Then, give me a logical reason he would hide the documents of his history if he had nothing to hide?
“Now if only the Constitution or the law or some Supreme Court decision said that.”
You actually believe it doesn’t???
And the Homelands documentation is a special case related to determining Hawaiian ancestry for special benefits. But if you look at their current website, you will see the following:
"Birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth and Certifications of Live Birth) and Certificates of Hawaiian Birth are the primary documents used to determine native Hawaiian qualification.
The Department of Hawaiian Home Lands accepts both Certificates of Live Birth (original birth certificate) and Certifications of Live Birth because they are official government records documenting an individuals birth. The Certificate of Live Birth generally has more information which is useful for genealogical purposes as compared to the Certification of Live Birth which is a computer-generated printout that provides specific details of a persons birth. Although original birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth) are preferred for their greater detail, the State Department of Health (DOH) no longer issues Certificates of Live Birth. When a request is made for a copy of a birth certificate, the DOH issues a Certification of Live Birth.”
It's really not mysterious at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.