Skip to comments.FIRST TIME IN U.S. HISTORY THAT A SITTING PRESIDENTíS ELIGIBILITY QUESTIONED BY MEMBER OF CONGRESS
Posted on 01/06/2010 6:30:17 AM PST by SvenMagnussen
(Jan. 5, 2010) The Post & Email can publicly confirm that on the first of December, last, U.S. Congressman Nathan Deal (GA-R) challenged the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of the U.S. presidency.
Todd Smith, Chief of Staff for Representative Nathan Deal of the United States House of Representatives serving Georgias 9th district, has confirmed today that Deal has sent a letter to Barack Hussein Obama requesting him to prove his eligibility for the office of President of the United States of America. The letter was sent electronically the first of December 2009 in pdf format, and Mr. Smith said that Representative Deal has confirmation from Obamas staff that it has been received. The letter did not have additional signatories. It originated solely from Representative Deal.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
Glad you liked it. They must be freaking out over this Glenn Beck thing and now Deal. Look at all of the old timer trolls here today and last night. Most use several screen names and disappear for awhile thn come back and use the old names. If you recall some of the newer anti-birthers you will notice that while the old ones are back the new ones are gone.
Those ignorant dudes are compost toast.
Pastriot idjits not Patriots.
Working for the HOLDER/AXELROD part of the Obama Junta.
They don't mean nothin.
We have them now.
Even Dodd is not running.
Yeah, I noticed something was up. The whole gang was back except the zotted like Michael Michael. ;-)
I didn’t know that someone has actually gotten zotted. I’d love to see them zot Rahm-sequiter and drew68 and olddeckhand.
His grandmother says he was born there, but she’s dead now. They built a shrine in Kenya saying he was born there. This is all going to blow up in his face. Man up Barry, you’ve been cornered.
Good for you, Nathan Deal. The patriots of America thank you.
But why? It would seem things are looking up!
I just got it, but that doesn’t mean much. Everyone calls it a “hoax” but as long as it keeps the story alive and includes the honest question of bo’s eligibility I will continue to post it.
"Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading." United States v Prudder, 424 F. 2d 1021(5thCir. 1970),cert. denied, 400 U.S. 831 (1970)
Edwin Vieira, Constitutional Lawyer: "at the inauguration. . he's aware he's not a citizen, then it's a perjured oath."
Who is Obama? Really, I'm serious, who is he? Where did he come from? What is his allegience?
"Frank Chapman, a CPUSA supporter, wrote a letter to the party newspaper hailing the Illinois senator's victory in the Iowa caucuses:
"Obamas victory was more than a progressive move; it was a dialectical leap ushering in a qualitatively new era of struggle. Marx once compared revolutionary struggle with the work of the mole, who sometimes burrows so far beneath the ground that he leaves no trace of his movement on the surface. This is the old revolutionary 'mole,' not only showing his traces on the surface but also breaking through."
from: People's Weekly World (PWW), official newspaper of the Communist Party, USA..."
How did he get a Security Clearance? Does he have one? I repeat, to whom or what is his primary Allegience? . . .
Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the Fourteenth Amendment, . . in the House on March 9, 1866: I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents [plural, meaning two] not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen
Thanks for sharing. Interesting message. I really hope that its true.
I’ve read all of your junk, thanks.
For the same reason your records are sealed - privacy laws.
Now that is pretty lame, since public officials are required to provide information beyond the private citizen.
KEEP HOPE ALIVE!!
Hope and Change. I used to believe that Hope was never a good plan.
Well then he shouldn’t be the President if he has a problem with privacy. When I joined the Navy, I had to show them a social security card, high school and college transcripts, a birth certificate, and be subjected to a background check. That was to become an Ensign. So if he wants to hide behind privacy laws, then he shouldn’t be able to get the job, simply because he cannot prove his eligibility.
I am only worried about possible heat exhaustion. I bet he gets mighty hot standing there...shade or no shade :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.